In the 2010s, there was wide disagreement between the Republicans and Democrats, because the minority party had been voting as a bloc against major legislation, according to
James Fallows. In 2010 (
Barack Obama had begun
his presidency on
January 20, 2009), the minority party (then the Republicans) had the ability to "discipline its ranks" so that none join the majority, and this situation in the
Congress is unprecedented, according to Fallows. He saw this inability to have bipartisanship as evidence of a "structural failure of the American government." Adviser to Obama,
Rahm Emanuel, said the period from 2008–2010 was marked by extreme partisanship. After the
U.S. elections of 2010, with sizeable gains by Republicans in the
House and
Senate, analyst Charles Babington of the
Associated Press suggested that both parties remained far apart on major issues such as
immigration and
Medicare, and there may be chances for agreement about lesser issues such as
electric cars,
nuclear power, and tax breaks for businesses; Babington was not optimistic about chances for bipartisanship on major issues in the next few years. In 2010, analyst
Benedict Carey (
The New York Times) agreed that political analysts tend to agree that the government will continue to be divided and marked by paralysis and feuding, there was research suggesting that humans have a "profound capacity through which vicious adversaries can form alliances," according to
Berkeley professor
Dacher Keltner. According to
Robert Siegel (
National Public Radio (NPR)), there was virtually no cooperation between Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. during the few years before 2010. An analysis in March 2010 suggested that the then state of American politics was marked by
oppositional politics which left the voters
cynical about the process. Bipartisanship requires "hard work", is "sometimes dull", and entails trying to find "common ground" but enables "serious problem solving", according to editorial writers at
The Christian Science Monitor in 2010. ==Impact==