Close, distant, and loose blockades A
close blockade entails placing warships within sight of the blockaded coast or port, to ensure the immediate interception of any ship entering or leaving. It is both the most effective and the most difficult form of blockade to implement. Difficulties arise because the blockading ships must remain continuously at sea, exposed to storms and hardship, usually far from any support, and vulnerable to sudden attack from the blockaded side, whose ships may stay safe in harbor until they choose to come out.
U-boats attempted to stop ships carrying food, supplies and
matériel from reaching the United Kingdom, an example of a
distant blockade. In a
distant blockade, the blockaders stay well away from the blockaded coast and try to intercept any ships going in or out. This may require more ships on station, but they can usually operate closer to their bases, and are at much less risk from enemy raids. This was almost impossible prior to the 16th century due to the nature of the ships used. A
loose blockade is a close blockade where the blockading ships are withdrawn out of sight from the coast, behind the horizon, but no farther. The object of loose blockade is to lure the enemy into venturing out but to stay close enough to strike. British
admiral Horatio Nelson applied a loose blockade at
Cádiz in 1805. The Franco-Spanish fleet under
Pierre-Charles Villeneuve then came out, resulting in the
Battle of Trafalgar.
Pacific blockade Until 1827, blockades, as part of
economic warfare, were always a part of a war. This changed when France,
Russia and Britain came to the aid of the
Greek rebels against Turkey. They blockaded the Turkish-occupied coast, which led to the
battle of Navarino. War was never declared, so it is considered the first
pacifici.e., peacefulblockade. The first truly
pacific blockade, involving no shooting at all, was the British blockade of the
Republic of New Granada in 1837, established to compel New Granada to release an imprisoned British consul. ==Legal status==