Since the publication of
Men at Arms, others have also made reference to the theory. In 2013, an article by the US
ConsumerAffairs made reference to the theory in regard to purchasing items on credit, specifically regarding children's boots from the retailer
Fingerhut; a $25 pair of boots, at the interest rates being offered, would cost $37 if purchased over seven months. In 2016, the left-wing blog
Dorset Eye also ran an article discussing the theory, giving
fuel poverty in the United Kingdom as an example of its application, citing a 2014
Office for National Statistics (ONS) report that those who pre-paid for electricity—who were most likely to be subject to fuel poverty—paid 8% more on their electricity bills than those who paid by
direct debit. In a 2020 discussion paper for the Social and Political Research Foundation, Sitara Srinivas used the theory to analyze how
sustainable fashion is inaccessible compared to
fast fashion. In an article titled "The Price of Poverty" published in
Tribune Magazine in 2022, the theory was cited as explaining the economic predicament in the United Kingdom. Examples provided included the higher cost of renting compared to home ownership, higher interest rates for loans to impoverished people, the effects of food poverty on educational advancement, and healthcare costs. == See also ==