The genus
Brachypelma was erected by
Eugène Simon in 1891 for the species
Mygale emilia, originally described in 1856.
Brachypelma is derived from the
Greek (brachys), meaning 'short' and (pelma) meaning 'the sole of the foot'. However,
arachnologists have conventionally taken
pelma to refer to the
tarsal scopula, producing the overall meaning '(with) short scopula'. (See also
Tarantula § The element pelma in genus names.) The genus has not always been recognized. In 1897,
Frederick Pickard-Cambridge considered
Brachypelma to be a synonym of
Eurypelma, regarding the two as not distinct from one another. (
Eurypelma is now a synonym of
Avicularia.) In 1903,
Reginald Pocock recognized
Brachypelma, listing four species and noting that there were more. Other arachnologists, like
Robert Raven in his 1985 monograph of Mygalomorphae, treated
Brachypelma as a synonym of
Euathlus. In 1992,
Günter Schmidt clarified the difference between
Euathlus and
Brachypelma, resulting in the latter's acceptance as a distinct genus. The genus
Brachypelmides, erected by Schmidt and Krause in 1994, is considered a synonym of
Brachypelma by some sources, including the
World Spider Catalog, although this has been rejected by Schmidt. When broadly defined,
Brachypelma is distinguished from related genera by the
plumose setae (hairs) on the
prolateral (forward-facing) side of the
trochanter and
femur of the first leg and on the
retrolateral (outward-facing) side of the
pedipalp. A 2017 study concluded that the genus
Brachypelma as then
circumscribed was not
monophyletic, and that only eight "red leg" species belong in
Brachypelma sensu stricto, the remaining species (the "red rump" group) being misplaced. In 2020, they were transferred to the new genus
Tliltocatl.
DNA barcoding In 2017, Mendoza and Francke applied
DNA barcoding to some Mexican species of
Brachypelma. In this approach, a portion of about 650
base pairs of the
mitochondrial gene
cytochrome oxidase I (COI) is used, primarily to identify existing species, but also sometimes to support a separation between species. One cladogram resulting from the DNA barcodes is shown below. Although
B. hamorii and
B. smithi are very similar in external appearance and have not always been treated as separate species, they are clearly distinguished by their DNA barcodes. All the species in the cladogram below belong to
Brachypelma sensu stricto (the "red leg" group). }}
Phylogeny In 2017, Steven Turner and colleagues reported on a
phylogenetic analysis of the family Theraphosidae based on
mitochondrial DNA. A
cladogram based on Bayesian analysis of a sample within their proposed tribe Theraphosini is shown below, with current genus names added. }} The cladogram shows that the genus
Brachypelma as then circumscribed was not
monophyletic, but fell into two distinct
clades. All analyses supported the view that
Brachypelma (along with
Aphonopelma) was made up of deeply divergent subgroups. Detailed analysis further suggested that the species in the "red rump" group were closely related, with several supposed species, particularly those labeled "
Brachypelma vagans" (now
Tliltocatl vagans) not being monophyletic. The authors cautioned that the necessary use of specimens obtained through the commercial pet trade meant that their exact geographical origins were often unknown, leading to uncertainty as to their identification. Subsequently, a new genus
Tliltocatl, was erected for the "red rump" group.
Species , the World Spider Catalog accepted only the species listed below. All other species formerly placed in
Brachypelma have been transferred to other genera, most to
Tliltocatl. •
Brachypelma albiceps Pocock, 1903 – Mexico •
Brachypelma auratum Schmidt, 1992 – Mexico •
Brachypelma baumgarteni Smith, 1993 – Mexico •
Brachypelma boehmei Schmidt & Klaas, 1993 – Mexico •
Brachypelma emilia (White, 1856) (
type species) – Mexico •
Brachypelma hamorii Tesmoingt, Cleton & Verdez, 1997 – Mexico •
Brachypelma klaasi (Schmidt & Krause, 1994) – Mexico •
Brachypelma smithi (F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897) – Mexico Two species have been moved to the genus
Sericopelma: •
Brachypelma angustum Valerio, 1980 →
Sericopelma angustum •
Brachypelma embrithes (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1936) →
Sericopelma embrithes ==Distribution==