Sources Much of what is known about the crisis is known from the journal of , a
Capuchin missionary from
Macerata who was staying in
Bhaktapur during the crisis of succession. There are also three copper plate inscriptions: two of them, at the temple of
Brahmani in
Bhaktapur attributed to Ranajita Malla, Briddhi Lakshmi and their child while the other two at the
temple of Balkumari in
Thimi and at
Chitrapur Village, south of Thimi; dating from the same day from Briddhi Lakshmi. Additionally, there are six
Newar Language poems written by Briddhi Lakshmi likely during her stay in Thimi or Kathmandu.
Background Ranajit Malla who ascended the throne after his
father's death in May 1722 had many concubines and one particular concubine, Jaya Lakshmi became the favourite of the king. From Jaya Lakshmi, Ranajit Malla had a son, named Ajitasimha Malla, whose birth date is not known yet, but he must have been the king's eldest male child as he is addressed as the crown prince in a document from 1728. Additionally, Jaya Lakshmi was addressed as the
rājapatni ("royal consort") in an epigraphy from 1733. Throughout this time, Briddhi Lakshmi appears to have been childless. However, in 20 July 1738, Briddhi Lakshmi gave birth to a son in
Thimi. Briddhi Lakshmi, being the king's only legitimate wife was favoured by the public and naturally Ranajit Malla was pressured by the public to change the crown prince to Briddhi Lakshmi's son. There is a copper plate at the
Brahmani temple of
Bhaktapur dating to
NS 859
kartika krishna 1 (November 1739 CE) that mentions a donation of six
Dapha to the
panchayat of the city from Ranajita Malla, Briddhi Lakshmi and the
Sahebaju. It seems Jaya Lakshmi wanted to maintain the status quo by retaining her son's position as the crown prince and pressured the king to not change his previous decision. had written in his journal, "the king had made every effort not to recognize as his legitimate son and heir to the kingdom, a boy born of a Queen; and the king did this at the instigation of his concubine, which she considered contrary to the statutes of the kingdom, wishing to make her own son succeed the king". However, there was significant public pressure that compelled the king to recognize the son of Briddhi Lakshmi as the heir. However, Jaya Lakshmi having the support of the nobility as well as being a favourite of the monarch was able to excerise much power on the palace. In contrast, Bridhhi Lakshmi had no supporters among the nobility and courtiers of the palace, likely due to Jaya Lakshmi being from one of the noble families herself, except for a minister which Beligatti specified was from a "non-aristocratic family". In her poems, she describes being bullied and ridiculed in the palace by her rivals, for instance her poem "
bhayirava taleju bihune varadāna" describe her situation as "I am being troubled like what a cow would feel united with a tiger". Beligatti also wrote in this journal that "the concubine had left no means untried to carry out her plan of destroying the little king"
Flight to Thimi copper plate inscription at
Balkumari temple,
Thimi dated to May 1740, mentions her taking refuge in the town. additionally wrote that Briddhi Lakshmi could not live in peace in the palace where her rival Jayalakshmi held all the power, and that she scented dangers ahead even for her child. Due to the public pressure regarding her safety, Ranajita Malla was compelled to appoint to a high-ranking office, which Beligatti calls
Viceroy, a supporter of Briddhi Lakshmi who arranged the escape of the Queen and her infant son to Thimi in mid-April 1740.
Thimi being the second largest city in the kingdom, along with some smaller settlements around it like
Nakadesh formed the
appanage to the heir. Not long after her flight to Thimi, the people of Thimi, Nagesh and
Nala declared her infant son as their king. Ranajit Malla in order to solve this predicament called a general council for the people on 26 April 1740, whereby he would grant permission for anyone in the kingdom to enter his palace and were given permission to freely express their opinions directly to their king. who was the witness of this event, wrote the following in his journal: "Due to this new turn of events, the King thought to convene a General Council on the
quid agendum and summoned it for the evening of April 26th which, being in my opinion bizarre, I do not think it right to omit. About two hours after sunset, the King, together with the 4 principal Brahmins, and the Viceroy descended to one of the 12 courtyards of the king's mansion. All of them sat around a
loggia and had all the torches removed so it was dark all around. Now, there were two gates that led from the square to the place where the King was with the aforesaid people, and having removed the guards at said gates allowed free entry to anyone who wished to enter and state their opinion
. There were a great many of such people. All of them had their faces covered to hide their identity and spoke in an affected tone not to be recognized. Some scolded the king, even called him bad names; others threatened him with dire consequences and still a few more tendered what one would like to call a simple advice. This went on until one hour after midnight had passed and those assembled then dispersed. The king deferred his judgment for the next day. Such night councils are not held except in similar cases, when the people are not satisfied with the King; and the King is hardly safe in his life, because these people are not bloodthirsty, principally toward their Kings, but when they are reduced to extremities they depose the King, and either confine him to an apartment of the court, or exile him from the Kingdom. What decision the King took after such a council, I never knew. Many members of both factions came to us and broke our ears with their stories. Some wanted the Prefect to speak to the King, but the Prefect always refused, saying that we had not come here to support any party or take part in politics, but only to teach religion". Briddhi Lakshmi set up a copper plate inscription in the
Balkumari temple of Thimi as well as another in the village of
Chitrapura, both dated to
NS 860
vaisakha vadi 1 Thursday (May 1740 CE), where she mentions her taking refuge in Thimi along with the
Sahebju. Both the copper plates also grant a tax exemption to the
panchayat of the respective towns for providing protection to the queen and her son. This succession crisis spread to other kingdoms of
Nepal as the king of Kathmandu
Jaya Prakasa Malla seems to have supported the queen in her uprising which created a quagmire with
Ranajita Malla and which eventually led to a minor war between them. On 20 July 1740, Briddhi Lakshmi had escaped
Thimi for
Kathmandu, with writing, "the Queen of Bhaktapur who was in
Thimi where the people had proclaimed her son king, on the pretext of bathing herself and her son in the river
Bagmati to satisfy a vow she had made went there, but when she arrived at the river, instead of washing herself she ordered to those who were carrying her to speedily reach the borders of
Kathmandu, and took refuge at the court where an apartment with guards was assigned to her by the king
Jaya Prakasa. The action of the queen was much talked about in all the
three kingdoms, even though she did that only in order to safeguard the life of the little king". Her flight to Kathmandu seems to affected the people back in
Bhaktapur, with Beligatti observing that the
Saparu festival in Bhaktapur was called off early and was conducted "very melancholily due to the evasion of the Queen and little King".
Aftermath It appears after the council, Ranajit Malla himself went to
Thimi to console his queen and resolve the conflict, however, it's unclear what happened afterwards or when she returned to
Bhaktapur after her flight to
Kathmandu as no clear sources have been found. The next source that mentions her is dated almost a decade after the event in 1750 (
NS 871), from two stone inscriptions, she set up in
Banepa, relating to her having built a temple and a bridge in the city. However, her son is mentioned in an edict from February 1747 (
NS 868
phalguna sukla 7) as
sri sri saheba juju as being invited to the inauguration of a
Buddhist monastery in
Bhaktapur. Similarly, in an inscription from a communal shelter in
Thimi dated to June 1751 (NS 872
jestha) identifies the
kingdom as under the joint rule of
Ranajita Malla and the Sahebaju. From 1750 she appears frequently as a donor of ceremonial and religious items in temples of
Bhaktapur and
Banepa with her last source being a donation at a temple in Bhaktapur from March 1754. == Children ==