When
Brontosaurus was described in 1879, the widespread notion in the scientific community was that sauropods were
semi-aquatic, lethargic reptiles that were inactive. Various uses for the single claw on the forelimb of sauropods have been proposed. One suggestion is that they were used for defense, but their shape and size make this unlikely. It was also possible they were for foraging, but the most probable use for the claw was grasping objects such as tree trunks when rearing. The slow locomotion of sauropods may be due to the minimal muscling or recoil after strides. A possible bipedal trackway of a juvenile
Apatosaurus is known, but it is disputed if it was possible for the sauropod.
Diet and energy requirements Being a diplodocid sauropod,
Brontosaurus was herbivorous and fed on
ferns,
cycadeoids,
seed ferns, and
horsetails, eating at ground height as a
nonselective browser. The replacement method and physiology of
Apatosauruss teeth is unique, with the entire tooth row being replaced at once and up to 60% more often than
Diplodocus. The teeth of
Apatosaurus are thick, lack denticles, and are strongly cylindrical in cross-section whereas they are long, slender, and elliptical in cross-section in
Diplodocus. These characteristics imply that
Apatosaurus, and likely
Brontosaurus, consumed tougher vegetation than
Diplodocus. Hypotheses of the food requirements of
Brontosaurus have been made, though predicting this is difficult due to the lack of modern analogues.
Endotherms (mammals) and
ectotherms (reptiles) require a specific amount of
nutrition to survive which correlates with their
metabolism as well as body size. Estimations of the dietary necessities of
Brontosaurus were made in 2010, with a guess of 2•10^4 to 50•10^4
kilojoules needed daily. This led to hypotheses on the distributions of
Brontosaurus to meet this requirement, though they varied on whether it was an ectotherm or endotherm. If
Brontosaurus was an endotherm, fewer adult individuals could be sustained than if it were an ectotherm, which could have tens of animals per square kilometer. Due to this, it has been theorized that
Brontosaurus and other sauropods living within the arid environment of the Morrison Formation participated in migrations between feeding sites. Assuming
Apatosaurus had an avian respiratory system and a reptilian resting-metabolism, Frank Paladino
etal. (1997) estimate the animal would have needed to consume only about of water per day.
Posture Historically, sauropods like
Brontosaurus were believed to have been too massive to support their weight on dry land, so theoretically, they must have lived partly submerged in water, perhaps in swamps. Recent findings do not support this, and sauropods are thought to have been fully terrestrial animals. Diplodocids like
Brontosaurus are often portrayed with their necks held high up in the air, allowing them to browse on tall trees. Though some studies have suggested that diplodocid necks were less flexible than previously believed, other studies have found that all
tetrapods appear to hold their necks at the maximum possible vertical extension when in a normal, alert posture, and argue that the same would hold true for sauropods barring any unknown, unique characteristics that set the soft tissue anatomy of their necks apart from that of other animals.
Physiology James Spotila
et al. (1991) suggest that the large body size of
Brontosaurus and other sauropods would have made them unable to maintain high metabolic rates, as they would not be able to release enough heat. However, temperatures in the Jurassic were 3 degrees Celsius higher than present. Furthermore, they assumed that the animals had a reptilian respiratory system. Matt Wedel found that an avian system would have allowed them to dump more heat. Some scientists have also argued that the heart would have had trouble sustaining sufficient blood pressure to oxygenate the brain. In 2008, a study on the growth rates of sauropods was published by biologists Thomas Lehman and
Holly Woodward. They said that by using growth lines and length-to-mass ratios,
Apatosaurus would have grown to 25t (25 long tons; 28 short tons) in 15years, with growth peaking at in a single year. An alternative method, using limb length and body mass, found
Brontosaurus and
Apatosaurus grew per year, and reached their full mass before it was about 70years old. These estimates have been called unreliable because the calculation methods are not sound; old growth lines would have been obliterated by bone remodeling. One of the first identified growth factors of
Apatosaurus was the number of sacral vertebrae, which increased to five by the time of the creature's maturity. This was first noted in 1903 and again in 1936.
Tail The estimated tail length of
Brontosaurus is approximately 56% of the total body length, with the tail sometimes hypothesized to be capable of functioning like a very long, tapering
bullwhip. There is some circumstantial evidence supporting this as well: a number of diplodocids have been found with fused or damaged tail vertebrae, which may be a symptom of cracking their tails: these are particularly common between the 18th and the 25th caudal vertebra, a region the authors consider a transitional zone between the stiff muscular base and the flexible whiplike section. However, Rega (2012) notes that
Camarasaurus while lacking a tailwhip, displays a similar level of caudal co-ossification and that
Mamenchisaurus while having the same pattern of vertebral metrics, lacks a tailwhip and does not display fusion in any "transitional region". Also, the crush fractures which would be expected if the tail was used as a whip have never been found in diplodocids. More recently, Baron (2020) has considered the use of the tail as a bullwhip unlikely because of the potentially catastrophic muscle and skeletal damage such speeds could cause on the large and heavy tail. Instead, he proposes that the tails might have been used as a tactile organ to keep in touch with the individuals behind and to the sides of the animal in a group, which could have augmented cohesion and allowed communication among individuals while limiting more energetically demanding activities like stopping to search for dispersed individuals, turning to visually check on others behind, or communicating vocally.
Neck combat of
B. excelsus, showing its robusticity The cervical vertebrae of
Brontosaurus and
Apatosaurus are robust, which has led to speculation on the use of these structures. These structures had expensive energy requirements, so the reason for their evolution must have been important to the animal. Notable features include dense cervical ribs and diapophyses, ribs that are angled ventrally, and an overall subtriangular cross-section. These traits are in contrast to the more fragile cervicals of diplodocines. Cervical ribs acted as anchors for the
longus colli ventralis and
flexer colli lateralis muscles, which are used in the downward motion of the neck. Stronger muscles for ventral motions allowed more force to be exerted downward. The cervical ribs formed a "V"-shape, which could be used to shelter the softer underlying tissues of the neck from damage. Ventral sides of the cervical ribs were capped by round, protruding
processes. These have been suggested to have been attachment points for
bosses or
keratinous spikes. A
preprint by Wedel
et al (2015) thought that due to the combination of these traits,
Brontosaurus would use its neck for combat between individuals through the use of striking necks. Behavior like this has been observed in other animals like giraffes and large tortoises. == Paleoecology ==