There is debate about the origins of Cantonese opera, but it is generally accepted that opera was brought from the northern part of China and slowly migrated to the southern province of Guangdong in the late 13th century, during the late
Southern Song dynasty. In the 12th century, there was a theatrical form called the
Nanxi or "Southern drama", which was performed in public theatres of
Hangzhou, then capital of the Southern Song. With the invasion of the
Mongol army,
Emperor Gong of the Song dynasty fled with hundreds of thousands of Song people into Guangdong in 1276. Among them were Nanxi performers from
Zhejiang, who brought Nanxi into Guangdong and helped develop the opera traditions in the south. Many well-known operas performed today, such as
Tai Nui Fa originated in the
Ming Dynasty and
The Purple Hairpin originated in the
Yuan Dynasty, with lyrics and scripts in
Cantonese. Until the 20th century all the female roles were performed by males.
Early development in Shanghai In the 1840s, a large number of businessmen from Guangdong migrated to Shanghai in search of new opportunities. They owned abundant resources, therefore, their influence in Shanghai has gradually increased (Song, 1994). Later, various clansmen associations have been established to sponsor different cultural activities, Cantonese opera was one of them. From the 1920s to the 1930s, the development of Cantonese opera in Shanghai was very impressive (Chong, 2014). At that time, the department stores opened by the Cantonese businessmen in Shanghai had their Cantonese opera theater companies. Moreover, the Guangdong literati in Shanghai always put great effort into promotions of Guangdong opera. A newspaper recorded that "The Cantonese operas were frequently played at that time. And the actors who came to perform in Shanghai were very famous. Every time many Cantonese merchants made reservations for inviting their guests to enjoy the opera".(Cheng, 2007)
Development in Hong Kong Beginning in the
1950s immigrants fled Shanghai to areas such as
North Point. Their arrival significantly boosted the Cantonese opera fan-base. Also, the Chinese Government wanted to deliver the message of socialist revolution to Chinese people under colonial governance in
Hong Kong. Agents of the
Chinese government founded newspaper platforms, such as Ta Kung Pao () and Chang Cheung Hua Pao () to promote Cantonese opera to the Hong Kong audience. These new platforms were used to promote new Cantonese opera releases. This helped to boost the popularity of Cantonese opera among the Hong Kong audience. Gradually, Cantonese opera became a part of daily entertainment in the colony. The popularity of Cantonese opera continued to grow during the 1960s. More theatres were established in Sheung Wan and Sai Wan, which became important entertainment districts. Later, performances began to be held in playgrounds, which provided more opportunities to develop Cantonese Opera in Hong Kong. As the variety of venues grew, so the variety of audiences became wider. However, Cantonese opera began to decline as TV and cinema started to develop in the late 1960s. Compared to Cantonese opera, cinema was cheaper and TV was more convenient. Subsequently, some theatres started to be repurposed as commercial or residential buildings. The resulting decline in available theatres further contributed to the decline of Cantonese opera in the territory. Since the demolition of
Lee Theatre and the closing down of many stages (Tai Ping Theatre,
Ko Shing Theatre, Paladium Theatre, Astor Theatre or former Po Hing Theatre, Kai Tak Amusement Park and
Lai Chi Kok Amusement Park) that were dedicated to the Cantonese genre throughout the decades, Hong Kong's
Sunbeam Theatre is one of the last facilities that is still standing to exhibit Cantonese opera. By the early 1980s,
Leung Hon-wai was one of the first in his generation of the
Chinese Artists Association of Hong Kong (hkbarwo) who gave classes and actively engaged in talent-hunting. The
Cantonese Opera Academy of Hong Kong classes started in 1980. To intensify education in Cantonese opera, they started to run an evening part-time certificate course in Cantonese opera training with assistance from
The Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts in 1998. In 1999, the Association and the academy further conducted a two-year daytime diploma programme in performing arts in Cantonese opera in order to train professional actors and actresses. Aimed at further raising the students' level, the Association and the academy launched an advanced course in Cantonese opera in the next academic year. In recent years, the Hong Kong Arts Development Council has given grants to the Love and Faith Cantonese Opera Laboratory to conduct Cantonese opera classes for children and young people. The Leisure and Cultural Services Department has also funded the International Association of Theatre Critics (Hong Kong Branch) to implement the "Cultural Envoy Scheme for Cantonese Opera" for promoting traditional Chinese productions in the community. Also, the Hong Kong Government planned to promote Cantonese opera through different communication channels. They wanted to build more theatres for the Hong Kong public to have more opportunities to enjoy Cantonese opera. The scheme also aimed to develop professional talents in Cantonese opera. Cantonese opera became a part of the compulsory music programme in primary school. For teachers, the Education Bureau provided some training and teaching materials related to Cantonese opera.
Art festivals In the first decade of the Hong Kong Arts Festivals and the Festivals of Asian Arts, Cantonese opera performances contributed by those representing the lion share of the market, (well-established troupes, well-known performers Lang Chi Bak as well as
Leung Sing Poh in their golden years or prominent performers in their prime) are: Fung Wong-nui (1925–1992) :1974, 2nd Hong Kong Arts Festival (self-financing 3 titles) ::
Xue Pinggui () ::
Time To Go Home () ::
Substituting a Racoon for the Prince () :1979, 7th Hong Kong Arts Festival* :1980, 8th Hong Kong Arts Festival Lam Kar Sing (1933–2015), bearer of the tradition handed down by
Sit Gok Sin and owner of name brand/tradition (personal art over lucrative "for hire" careers in films or on stage) as well as volunteer tutor to two ( 1987, 2008) students handpicked right out of training schools :1976, 1st Festival of Asian Arts :1977, 2nd Festival of Asian Arts ::
Lu Wen-long () ::
Bao and Dai of Red Chamber () :1978, 6th Hong Kong Arts Festival* ::
Butterfly Lovers () :::Yam-Fong title :::For two decades a regular if opposite Lee Bo-ying :::Loong Kim Sang lost the only compatible co-star for this title in 1976 :::One of many traceable artistic interpretations of same legend :::Lam forged his own (still opposite Lee Bo-ying) in November 1987 and made that the contemporary prevailing version :1978, 3rd Festival of Asian Arts :1980, 5th Festival of Asian Arts :1982, 7th Festival of Asian Arts :1984, Chinese Opera Fortnight () ::
Time To Go Home () – the contemporary prevailing version ::
The Sounds of Battle () ::
Romance and Hatred () ::
Merciless Sword Under Merciful Heaven () • Last time both
Lang Chi Bak (1904-1992)and
Leung Sing Poh performed was in 1979.
Loong Kim Sang :1983, 8th Festival of Asian Arts :1984, 9th Festival of Asian Arts ::
Di Nü Hua () ::
The Purple Hairpin () ::
Dream of Red Chamber () :::40 years since Yam's best known role and title (opposite
Chan Yim Nung) in 1944 :::New script debuted in November 1983 :::Contemporary prevailing version ::
Mistake at the Flower Festival () ::
The Reincarnation of a Beauty () ::
The Peony Pavilion () :1985, 10th Festival of Asian Arts Obscure groups of experimental nature, let alone those late boomers without market value, were not on the map or in the mind of those organizing these events. That changed since the 40 something Leung Hon-wai found his way to the stepping stone or launching pad he desired for pet projects of various nature.
Public funding To continue the tradition by passing on what elders and veterans inherited from former generations and to improve sustainability with new and original music, lyrics and scripts. • Cantonese Opera Development Fund •
Hong Kong Arts Development Council, Grants Heritage is as abstract a concept as traditions is while monetary support is real. However, elders are not
ombudspersons in any sense and they take public funds for their own reasons. That is, they are knee deep in commercial performances even as a member of the above organizations. A
juren a century ago can be an
adjunct associate professor now in Hong Kong. How business was conducted in a community by a juren was illustrated by
Ma Sze Tsang in a film called the
Big Thunderstorm (1954). Trend-setting figure, Leung Hon-wai, talked on camera about his doctrine related to new titles he wrote and monetary backings from the various Hong Kong authorities. That is,
art festivals provided him financial means, identity, advertising resources and opportunities not otherwise available. Curious audience makes good box-office for the only 2–3 shows of a single new title. In addition, he only paid 50% to collect the new costumes in his possession for future performances of different titles. A
Sit Kok Sin classic fetched HK$105,200 plus in 2015. The parents who had over 100 years of experience combined found sharing the stage with their son as not feasible without subsidies for Golden Will Chinese Opera Association and Wan Fai-yin, Christina.
Time To Go Home is different from those Leung debuted at arts festivals since:- • This 1939 Sit classic has been a
rite of passage for new performers to become prominent male leads. • It only involves minimum costumes, props and crew size. • It is popular as afternoon fillers by third tier performers in bamboo theaters. In 2019, Yuen Siu Fai talked on radio that he found the readily available funding made beneficiaries financially irresponsible, unlike himself and others who put their own money where their mouths were. Yuen, who works regularly for troupes with secure public funding, did not draw a link between his two roles. Contrary to Africa, the
entire village is responsible for raising the children of a certain crowd only. Both political and social
guanxi is making or breaking the future of up-and-coming performers in the same way as whether
Bak Yuk Tong is remembered as one of the Four Super Stars or not. According to Yuen, Bak is anti-communist and therefore his status is different in mainland China (PRC). ===
Crowdfunding===
Private funding • The Art of Fong Yim-fun Sustainability Project, Shaw College,
CUHK. In August 2014, the Fong Yim Fun Art Gallery was formally opened. •
Dr. Yang Leung Yin-fong Katie, the Honorary Life Chairman, donated one of her properties to be the permanent office of the Chinese Artists Association of Hong Kong to provide residences for aged musicians. ===
Jumping the shark=== In 2019,
Yuen Siu Fai said that old performers are to stay front and center on stage as long as they want to take center stage instead of sharing, let alone ceding, the limelight to the next or even younger generations. Yuen insists that performers without
bags under their eyes could not be any good. In 2018,
Law Kar Ying said
Chan Kam Tong had already
jumped the shark in the mid-1950s, more than ten years before Chan actually left the stage or more than 60 years for it to be confirmed to the public. The (Yuen, Law and others) generation with bags under their eyes picked up where Leung left off. By such, these old performers are upholding the Chan tradition and making up records along the way. However, the Chan
caliber of masters needed no directors. Two performers Chan worked with closely, who definitely left the stage at will with dignity, are
Yam Kim Fai and
Fong Yim Fun. They both openly rebuked (in 1969 and in 1987 respectively in no harsher way than what
Lam Kar Sing and his wife did in 1983) individual off-springs who were under their wings briefly but officially. The popularity of Yam-Fong in Hong Kong continues to thrive notwithstanding their apparent lack of official successors as Loong Kim Sang and Lee Bo Ying picked up where they left off. Cantonese opera in Hong Kong rocketed around 1985/86, according to Li Jian (), born Lai Po Yu (), an observer.
De facto successors to master performers,
Lee Bo Ying, Lam Kar Sing, and
Loong Kim Sang all left the stage in or before 1993, last watershed moment of Cantonese opera for Hong Kong and beyond in the 20th century. The consequences are also significant and long lasting. Unlike Fong and Loong, Yam and Lee never returned. For the rest of her life, Yam didn't even take the bow at curtain calls although she was in the audience on most days that Loong's troupe performed in Hong Kong. Comfortable enough around Yam, Yuen called Yam lazy because she did not comment on some cake served backstage in those days.
Decline Local
Teochew opera troupes lost their ability to put on live-on-stage
Ghost Festival opera performances when the business environment was destroyed. Since then, the Teochew genre has all but disappeared in Hong Kong. Chan Kim-seng, the former chairperson of the Chinese Artists Association of Hong Kong, saw similar threats towards Cantonese opera and fought for the job security of members. Chan, the Representative Inheritor of Cantonese opera in the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, died on 19 August 2013. ==Characteristics==