The duties of the censors may be divided into three classes, all of which were closely connected with one another: • The
Census, register of all citizens and their property, confirmation or appointment of
senators (
lectio senatus, ), and recognition of those who qualified for the
equestrian rank (
recognitio equitum); • The
Regimen Morum, keeping of public morals; and • The administration of the finances of the state, superintendence of public buildings, and erection of all new public works. The original business of the censorship was at first of a much more limited kind, and was restricted almost entirely to taking the census, but the possession of this power gradually brought with it fresh power and new duties, as is shown below. A general view of these duties is briefly expressed in the following passage of Cicero: "
Censores populi aevitates, soboles, familias pecuniasque censento: urbis templa, vias, aquas, aerarium, vectigalia tuento: populique partes in tribus distribunto: exin pecunias, aevitates, ordines patiunto: equitum, peditumque prolem describunto: caelibes esse prohibento: mores populi regunto: probrum in senatu ne relinquunto." This can be translated as: "The Censors are to determine the generations, origins, families, and properties of the people; they are to (watch over/protect) the city's temples, roads, waters, treasury, and taxes; they are to divide the people into three parts; next, they are to (allow/approve) the properties, generations, and ranks [of the people]; they are to describe the offspring of knights and footsoldiers; they are to forbid being unmarried; they are to guide the behavior of the people; they are not to overlook abuse in the Senate."
Census , late 2nd century BC The Census, the first and principal duty of the censors, was always held in the
Campus Martius, and from the year 435 BC onwards, in a special building called
Villa publica, which was erected for that purpose by the second pair of censors,
Gaius Furius Pacilus Fusus and
Marcus Geganius Macerinus. An account of the formalities with which the census was opened is given in a fragment of the
Tabulae Censoriae, preserved by Varro. After the
auspices had been taken, the citizens were summoned by a public crier to appear before the censors. Each tribe was called up separately, and the names in each tribe were probably taken according to the lists previously made out by the tribunes of the tribes. Every
pater familias had to appear in person before the censors, who were seated in their
curule chairs, and those names were taken first which were considered to be of good omen, such as
Valerius,
Salvius,
Statorius, etc. The Census was conducted according to the judgement of the censor (
ad arbitrium censoris), but the censors laid down certain rules, sometimes called
leges censui censendo, in which mention was made of the different kinds of property subject to the census, and in what way their value was to be estimated. According to these laws, each citizen had to give an account of himself, of his family, and of his property upon oath, "declared from the heart". First he had to give his full name (
praenomen,
nomen, and
cognomen) and that of his father, or if he were a
libertus ("freedman") that of his
patron, and he was likewise obliged to state his age. He was then asked, "You, declaring from your heart, do you have a wife?" and if married he had to give the name of his wife, and likewise the number, names, and ages of his children, if any. Single women and orphans were represented by their guardians; their names were entered in separate lists, and they were not included in the sum total of heads. After a citizen had stated his name, age, family, etc., he then had to give an account of all his property, so far as it was subject to the census. Only such things were liable to the census (
censui censendo) as were property according to the
Quiritary law. At first, each citizen appears to have merely given the value of his whole property in general without entering into details; but it soon became the practice to give a minute specification of each article, as well as the general value of the whole. Land formed the most important article of the census, but public land, the possession of which only belonged to a citizen, was excluded as not being Quiritarian property. Judging from the practice of the imperial period, it was the custom to give a most minute specification of all such land as a citizen held according to the Quiritarian law. He had to state the name and location of the land, and to specify what portion of it was arable, what meadow, what vineyard, and what olive-ground: and of the land thus described, he had to give his assessment of its value.
Slaves and cattle formed the next most important item. The censors also possessed the right of calling for a return of such objects as had not usually been given in, such as clothing, jewels, and carriages. It has been doubted by some modern writers whether the censors possessed the power of setting a higher valuation on the property than the citizens themselves gave, but given the discretionary nature of the censors' powers, and the necessity almost that existed, in order to prevent fraud, that the right of making a surcharge should be vested in somebody's hands, it is likely that the censors had this power. It is moreover expressly stated that on one occasion they made an extravagant surcharge on articles of luxury; A person who voluntarily absented himself from the census was considered
incensus and subject to the severest punishment.
Servius Tullius is said to have threatened such individuals with imprisonment and death, and in the
Republican period he might be sold by the state as a slave. In the later period of the Republic, a person who was absent from the census might be represented by another, and be thus registered by the censors. Whether the soldiers who were absent on service had to appoint a representative is uncertain. In ancient times, the sudden outbreaks of war prevented the census from being taken, because a large number of the citizens would necessarily be absent. It is supposed from a passage in
Livy that in later times the censors sent commissioners into the provinces with full powers to take the census of the Roman soldiers there, but this seems to have been a special case. It is, on the contrary, probable from the way in which Cicero pleads the absence of
Archias from Rome with the army under
Lucullus, as a sufficient reason for his not having been enrolled in the census, that service in the army was a valid excuse for absence. , which housed the
aerarium Saturni and the
aerarium sanctum After the censors had received the names of all the citizens with the amount of their property, they then had to make out the lists of the tribes, and also of the classes and centuries; for by the legislation of Servius Tullius the position of each citizen in the state was determined by the amount of his property (
Comitia Centuriata). These lists formed a most important part of the
Tabulae Censoriae, under which name were included all the documents connected in any way with the discharge of the censors' duties. These lists, insofar as they were connected with the finances of the state, were deposited in the
aerarium, located in the
Temple of Saturn; but the regular depository for all the archives of the censors was in earlier times the
Atrium Libertatis, near the Villa publica, and in later times the temple of the Nymphs. In addition to the division of the citizens into tribes, centuries, and classes, the censors had the power to confirm or revise the list of senators, striking out the names of such as they considered unworthy, and making additions to the body from those who were qualified. In the same manner, they held a review of the
equites who received a horse from public funds (
equites equo publico), and added and removed names as they judged proper. They also confirmed the
princeps senatus, or appointed a new one. The princeps himself had to be a former censor. After the lists had been completed, the number of citizens was counted up, and the sum total announced. Accordingly, we find that in the account of a census, the number of citizens is likewise usually given. They are in such cases spoken of as
capita ("heads"), sometimes with the addition of the word
civium ("of the citizens"), and sometimes not. Hence, to be registered in the census was the same thing as "having a head" (
caput habere).
Census beyond Rome A census was sometimes taken in the provinces, even under the Republic. The emperor sent into the provinces special officers called
censitores to take the census; but the duty was sometimes discharged by the Imperial
legati. The
censitores were assisted by subordinate officers, called
censuales, who made out the lists, etc. In Rome, the census was still taken under the Empire, but the old ceremonies connected with it were no longer performed, and the ceremony of the
lustratio was not performed after the time of
Vespasian. The jurists
Paulus and
Ulpian each wrote works on the census in the imperial period; and several extracts from these works are given in a chapter in the
Digest (50 15).
Other uses of census The word
census, besides the conventional meaning of "valuation" of a person's estate, has other meaning in Rome; it could refer to: • the amount of a person's property (hence we read of
census senatorius, the estate of a senator;
census equestris, the estate of an
eques). • the lists of the censors. • the tax which depended upon the valuation in the census. The Lexicons will supply examples of these meanings.
Regimen morum Keeping the public morals (
regimen morum, or in the
Empire cura morum or
praefectura morum) was the second most important branch of the censors' duties, and the one which caused their office to be one of the most revered and the most dreaded; hence they were also known as
castigatores ("chastisers"). It naturally grew out of the right which they possessed of excluding persons from the lists of citizens; for, as has been well remarked, "they would, in the first place, be the sole judges of many questions of fact, such as whether a citizen had the qualifications required by law or custom for the rank which he claimed, or whether he had ever incurred any judicial sentence, which rendered him infamous: but from thence the transition was easy, according to Roman notions, to the decisions of questions of right; such as whether a citizen was really worthy of retaining his rank, whether he had not committed some act as justly degrading as those which incurred the sentence of the law." In this manner, the censors gradually assumed at least nominal complete superintendence over the whole public and private life of every citizen. They were constituted as the conservators of public morality; they were not simply to prevent crime or particular acts of immorality, but rather to maintain the traditional Roman character, ethics, and habits (
mos majorum)—
regimen morum also encompassed this protection of traditional ways, which was called in the times of the Empire
cura ("supervision") or
praefectura ("command"). The punishment inflicted by the censors in the exercise of this branch of their duties was called
nota ("mark, letter") or
notatio, or
animadversio censoria ("censorial reproach"). In inflicting it, they were guided only by their conscientious convictions of duty; they had to take an oath that they would act biased by neither partiality nor favour; and, in addition to this, they were bound in every case to state in their lists, opposite the name of the guilty citizen, the cause of the punishment inflicted on him,
subscriptio censoria. This part of the censors' office invested them with a peculiar kind of jurisdiction, which in many respects resembled the exercise of public opinion in modern times; for there are innumerable actions which, though acknowledged by everyone to be prejudicial and immoral, still do not come within the reach of the positive laws of a country; as often said, "immorality does not equal illegality". Even in cases of real crimes, the positive laws frequently punish only the particular offence, while in public opinion the offender, even after he has undergone punishment, is still incapacitated for certain honours and distinctions which are granted only to persons of unblemished character. Hence, the Roman censors might brand a man with their "censorial mark" (
nota censoria) in case he had been convicted of a crime in an ordinary court of justice, and had already suffered punishment for it. The consequence of such a
nota was only
ignominia and not
infamia.
Infamia and the censorial verdict was not a
judicium or
res judicata, for its effects were not lasting, but might be removed by the following censors, or by a
lex (roughly "law"). A censorial mark was moreover not valid unless both censors agreed. The
ignominia was thus only a transitory reduction of status, which does not even appear to have deprived a magistrate of his office, and certainly did not disqualify persons labouring under it for obtaining a magistracy, for being appointed as
judices by the
praetor, or for serving in the
Roman army.
Mamercus Aemilius Mamercinus was thus, notwithstanding the reproach of the censors (
animadversio censoria), made
dictator. A person might be branded with a censorial mark in a variety of cases, which it would be impossible to specify, as in a great many instances it depended upon the discretion of the censors and the view they took of a case; and sometimes even one set of censors would overlook an offence which was severely chastised by their successors. But the offences which are recorded to have been punished by the censors are of a threefold nature. A person who had been branded with a
nota censoria, might, if he considered himself wronged, endeavour to prove his innocence to the censors, and if he did not succeed, he might try to gain the protection of one of the censors, that he might intercede on his behalf.
Punishments The punishments inflicted by the censors generally differed according to the station which a man occupied, though sometimes a person of the highest rank might suffer all the punishments at once, by being degraded to the lowest class of citizens. The punishments are generally divided into four classes: •
Motio ("removal") or
ejectio e senatu ("ejection from the Senate"), or the exclusion of a man from the ranks of senators. This punishment might either be a simple exclusion from the list of senators, or the person might at the same time be excluded from the tribes and degraded to the rank of an
aerarian. The latter course seems to have been seldom adopted; the ordinary mode of inflicting the punishment was simply this: the censors in their new lists omitted the names of such senators as they wished to exclude, and in reading these new lists in public, quietly omitted the names of those who were no longer to be senators. Hence the expression
praeteriti senatores ("senators passed over") is equivalent to
e senatu ejecti (those removed from the Senate). In some cases, however, the censors did not acquiesce to this simple mode of proceeding, but addressed the senator whom they had noted, and publicly reprimanded him for his conduct. As in ordinary cases an ex-senator was not disqualified by his
ignominia for holding any of the magistracies which opened the way to the Senate, he might at the next census again become a senator. • The
ademptio equi, or taking away of the publicly funded horse from an
equestrian. This punishment might likewise be simple, or combined with the exclusion from the tribes and the degradation to the rank of an
aerarian. • The
motio e tribu, or the exclusion of a person from his tribe. This punishment and the degradation to the rank of an
aerarian were originally the same, but when in the course of time a distinction was made between the rural or rustic tribes and the urban tribes, the
motio e tribu transferred a person from the rustic tribes to the less respectable city tribes, and if the further degradation to the rank of an
aerarian was combined with the
motio e tribu, it was always expressly stated. • The fourth punishment was called
referre in aerarios or
facere aliquem aerarium, and might be inflicted on any person who was thought by the censors to deserve it. This degradation, properly speaking, included all the other punishments, for an equestrian could not be made an
aerarius unless he was previously deprived of his horse, nor could a member of a rustic tribe be made an
aerarius unless he was previously excluded from it. It was this authority of the Roman censors which eventually developed into the modern meaning of "censor" and "
censorship"—i.e., officials who review published material and forbid the publication of material judged to be contrary to "public morality" as the term is interpreted in a given political and social environment.
Administration of the finances of the state The administration of the state's finances was another part of the censors' office. In the first place the
tributum, or property-tax, had to be paid by each citizen according to the amount of his property registered in the census, and, accordingly, the regulation of this tax naturally fell under the jurisdiction of the censors. They also had the superintendence of all the other revenues of the state, the
vectigalia, such as the tithes paid for the public lands, the salt works, the mines, the customs, etc. The censors typically auctioned off to the highest bidder for the space of a
lustrum the collection of the tithes and taxes (
tax farming). This auctioning was called
venditio or
locatio, and seems to have taken place in the month of March, in a public place in Rome The terms on which they were let, together with the rights and duties of the purchasers, were all specified in the
leges censoriae, which the censors published in every case before the bidding commenced. For further particulars see
Publicani. The censors also possessed the right, though probably not without the assent of the Senate, of imposing new
vectigalia, and even of selling the land belonging to the state. It would thus appear that it was the duty of the censors to bring forward a budget for a five-year period, and to take care that the income of the state was sufficient for its expenditure during that time. In part, their duties resembled those of a modern
minister of finance. The censors, however, did not receive the revenues of the state. All the public money was paid into the
aerarium, which was entirely under the jurisdiction of the Senate; and all disbursements were made by order of this body, which employed the
quaestors as its officers.
Overseeing public works In one important department, the public works, the censors were entrusted with the expenditure of the public money (though the actual payments were no doubt made by the quaestors). The censors had the general superintendence of all the public buildings and works (
opera publica), and to meet the expenses connected with this part of their duties, the Senate voted them a certain sum of money or certain revenues, to which they were restricted, but which they might at the same time employ according to their discretion. They had to see that the temples and all other public buildings were in a good state of repair, that no public places were encroached upon by the occupation of private persons, and that the
aqueducts,
roads, drains, etc. were properly attended to. The repairs of the public works and the keeping of them in proper condition were let out by the censors by
public auction to the lowest bidder, just as the
vectigalia were let out to the highest bidder. These expenses were called
ultrotributa, and hence we frequently find
vectigalia and
ultrotributa contrasted with one another. The persons who undertook the contract were called
conductores,
mancipes,
redemptores,
susceptores, etc., and the duties they had to discharge were specified in the
Leges Censoriae. The censors had also to superintend the expenses connected with the worship of the gods, even for instance the feeding of the sacred geese in the Capitol; these various tasks were also let out on contract. It was ordinary for censors to expend large amounts of money (“by far the largest and most extensive” of the state) in their public works. , one of the most influential censors Besides keeping existing public buildings and facilities in a proper state of repair, the censors were also in charge of constructing new ones, either for ornament or utility, both in Rome and in other parts of Italy, such as temples,
basilicae,
theatres,
porticoes,
fora,
aqueducts,
town walls, harbours, bridges, cloacae, roads, etc. These works were either performed by them jointly, or they divided between them the money, which had been granted to them by the Senate. They were let out to contractors, like the other works mentioned above, and when they were completed, the censors had to see that the work was performed in accordance with the contract: this was called
opus probare or
in acceptum referre. The first ever Roman road, the
Via Appia, and the first Roman aqueduct, the
Aqua Appia, were all constructed under the censorship of
Appius Claudius Caecus, one of the most influential censors. The
aediles had likewise a superintendence over the public buildings, and it is not easy to define with accuracy the respective duties of the censors and aediles, but it may be remarked in general that the superintendence of the aediles had more of a police character, while that of the censors were more financial in subject matter.
Lustrum After the censors had performed their various duties and taken the five-yearly census, the
lustrum, a solemn purification of the people, followed. When the censors entered upon their office, they drew lots to see which of them should perform this purification; but both censors were of course obliged to be present at the ceremony. Long after the Roman census was no longer taken, the Latin word
lustrum has survived, and been adopted in some modern languages, in the derived sense of a period of five years, i.e., half a decennium. == Census statistics ==