First described in the genus
Cupressus as
Cupressus nootkatensis in 1824 based on a specimen collected "ad Sinum Nootka dictum", which translates to "said Bay of Nootka". It was transferred to
Chamaecyparis in 1841 on the basis of its foliage being in flattened sprays, as in other
Chamaecyparis, but unlike most (though not all) other
Cupressus species. However, this placement does not fit with the morphology and phenology of the cones, which are far more like
Cupressus, maturing in two years rather than one. Genetic evidence, published by Gadek et al., strongly supported its return to
Cupressus and exclusion from
Chamaecyparis. Farjon
et al. (2002) transferred it to a new genus
Xanthocyparis, together with the newly discovered
Vietnamese golden cypress (
Xanthocyparis vietnamensis); this species is remarkably similar to Nootka cypress and the treatment has many arguments in its favour, as while they are not related to
Chamaecyparis, neither do they fit fully in
Cupressus despite the many similarities. Little et al. confirmed this relationship with further evidence and pointed out that an earlier nomenclatural combination in the genus
Callitropsis existed, as
Callitropsis nootkatensis (D.Don) Oerst., published in 1864 but overlooked or ignored by other subsequent authors. Little et al. In 2010, Mao et al. performed a more detailed molecular analysis and placed Nootka cypress back in
Cupressus. This was disputed, as the tree would compose a monophyletic subgenus, but the
Gymnosperm Database suggested that it could comprise a monotypic genus as
Callitropsis nootkatensis. In 2021, a molecular study by Stull et al. found the species to indeed belong to the distinct genus
Callitropsis and recovered this as the sister genus to
Hesperocyparis. The clade comprising both was found to be sister to
Xanthocyparis (containing only the Vietnamese golden cypress), and the clade containing the three genera was found to be sister to a clade containing
Juniperus and
Cupressus sensu stricto. ==Distribution and habitat==