In 2005, three groups sequentially established ChR2 as a tool for
genetically targeted optical remote control (
optogenetics) of
neurons, neural circuits and behavior. At first,
Karl Deisseroth's lab demonstrated that ChR2 could be deployed to control
mammalian neurons
in vitro, achieving temporal precision on the order of milliseconds (both in terms of delay to spiking and in terms of temporal jitter). This study was the first wherein ChR2 was expressed alongside an optical silencer, vertebrate
rhodopsin-4 in this case, demonstrating for the first time that excitable cells could be activated and silenced using these two tools simultaneously, illuminating the tissue at different wavelengths. It was demonstrated that ChR2, if expressed in specific neurons or muscle cells, can evoke predictable behaviors, i.e. can control the nervous system of an intact animal, in this case the invertebrate
C. elegans. This was the first using ChR2 to steer the behavior of an animal in an optogenetic experiment, rendering a genetically specified cell type subject to optical remote control. Although both aspects had been illustrated earlier that year by the group of
Gero Miesenböck, deploying the indirectly light-gated ion channel P2X2, it was henceforth microbial opsins like channelrhodopsin that dominated the field of genetically targeted remote control of excitable cells, due to the power, speed, targetability, ease of use, and temporal precision of direct optical activation, not requiring any external chemical compound such as caged ligands. To overcome its principal downsides – the small single-channel conductance (especially in steady-state), the limitation to one optimal excitation wavelength (~470
nm, blue) as well as the relatively long recovery time, not permitting controlled firing of neurons above 20–40 Hz – ChR2 has been optimized using
genetic engineering. A
point mutation H134R (exchanging the amino acid Histidine in position 134 of the native protein for an
Arginine) resulted in increased steady-state conductance, as described in a 2005 paper that also established ChR2 as an optogenetic tool in
C. elegans. In 2010, the groups of Hegemann and Deisseroth introduced an E123T mutation into native ChR2, yielding ChETA, which has faster on- and off-
kinetics, permitting the control of individual action potentials at frequencies up to 200
Hz (in appropriate cell types). Using parts of the ChR1 sequence, photocurrent amplitude was later improved to allow excitation of two neuronal populations at two distinct wavelengths. the optogenetic induction of learning in rodents, the experimental treatment of
Parkinson's disease in rats, and the combination with
fMRI (opto-fMRI). Other labs have pioneered the combination of ChR2 stimulation with
calcium imaging for all-optical experiments, neural circuits, ChR2 expression from a transgenic locus – directly or in the
Cre-lox conditional paradigm In March 2013, the Brain Prize (Grete Lundbeck European Brain Research Prize) was jointly awarded to Bamberg, Boyden, Deisseroth, Hegemann, Miesenböck, and Nagel for "their invention and refinement of optogenetics". The same year, Hegemann and Nagel received the
Louis-Jeantet Prize for Medicine for "the discovery of channelrhodopsin". In 2015, Boyden and Deisseroth received the
Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences and in 2020, Miesenböck, Hegemann and Nagel received the Shaw prize in Life Science and Medicine for the development of optogenetics. ==Designer-channelrhodopsins==