Reviews Prior to the issue being published, the controversial cover was released by the magazine, and media weighed in.
Myriam François-Cerrah, a Muslim
freelance journalist of French paternal descent, criticized
Charlie Hebdo for again using racial stereotypes when portraying Muhammad and Muslims, saying "We (thankfully!) wouldn't accept an image of a hooked-nose Jew, so it is unclear to me why images of hooked-nose Arabs – because forget who the prophet Muhammad is to Muslims, he is an Arab man being depicted in racially stereotypical terms – isn't more disturbing to others." Art critic
Jonathan Jones for
The Guardian called the cover "a life-affirming work of art", further writing, "Funny people were killed for being funny; this new cover is the only possible response – a response that makes you laugh." Editorial writer Sanna Rayman in Sweden's
Svenska Dagbladet found the cover to be an elegant balancing act which combined forgiving reconciliation with determination to assert their right of satirising whomever they want. Erik Bergersen, editor of the Norwegian satirical site
Opplysningskontoret, wrote an indepth commentary in
Aftenposten after the issue was released. Bergersen said the issue still succeeds as multi-layered satire, hitting in many directions yet possibly also offending those who have stated support for the magazine. In his column, titled "To be
Charlie or not to be," he praised the magazine for not changing a thing. "But while they stretch out a conciliatory hand, so do they also keep their fist clenched tightly against what they believe threatens freedom of expression. And by that they insist that today's media public is nuanced enough to keep both ideas in mind simultaneously... This is where the genius of
Charlie lay. And it's still there." To comics critic Matthias Wivel, the contents of the issue were "mostly mediocre cartoons", particularly of the work of the murdered cartoonists. He had higher praise for the cartoons made in response to the shootings, in particular those by Sattouf, whose strip he called "Street-level Voltaire wittily written in sociolect"; Walter Foolz, for his international perspective; and the rejected-covers feature on the back page.
Media coverage The publication of the issue was widely covered in French media, which showed pictures of the front pages as well as other drawings from the issue. Editor-in-chief Gérard Biard denied the cover implied the murderers should be absolved of their crimes, and rejected accusations of racism, Islamophobia, and provocation of Muslims by
Charlie Hebdo. He asserted the need to uphold '''' in the face of global socio-political conditions that challenge such values.
Other reactions The leading Egyptian religious institution
Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyyah denounced the issue, saying it "deepens hatred and discrimination between Muslims and others" and called on French political leaders to condemn what it considered
Charlie Hebdo "racist act which works to incite sectarianism". The
Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Muhammad Ahmad Hussein condemned the cartoons as hurting the feelings of Muslims all over the world, while at the same time condemning terrorism and violence against innocents. Following
Cumhuriyet publishing of a small picture of the Muhammad caricature, a court in Turkey banned websites that published
Charlie Hebdo. The newspaper received death threats and came under police protection. A
Spokesperson for the United States Department of State Marie Harf said the U.S. fully supported
Charlie Hebdos right to publish the issue.
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom David Cameron also supported it. Australian Prime Minister
Tony Abbott said to an Australian radio station that while he didn't like everything the magazine published, "he rather like[d]" the cartoon on the cover, which he interpreted as a symbol of forgiveness. A
Wiltshire Police officer asked a newsagent in
Corsham for details on customers who bought the issue. When this came to public attention, the Wiltshire Police declared that they were seeking to defend the customers, and that the details gathered had been permanently deleted. In Iran, the government responded to the cartoons by organizing a second annual
Holocaust cartoon competition.
Violence A newsagent in the English city of
Oxford, himself a Muslim, abandoned plans to sell the issue after receiving threats of arson against his premises. The publication sparked riots in
Zinder,
Niger, which resulted in five deaths. The city also experienced attacks on Christian-owned shops and a French cultural center was attacked when a crowd of 50 people set fire to its adjacent cafeteria, library, and offices. Muslim crowds demonstrating against Muhammad's depiction attacked and set alight French businesses and churches with incendiary devices in
Niamey; and five deaths were reported. Other demonstrations occurred in
Algiers,
Khartoum,
Mogadishu, and
Indian-administered Kashmir.
Pakistan saw violent demonstrations in
Karachi. Asif Hassan, a Muslim Arab photographer working for the French news agency
AFP, was seriously injured when he was shot in the chest. In Algiers and
Jordan, protesters clashed with police, but there were non-violent demonstrations against the cartoon in Khartoum, Sudan,
Russian Muslims in north Caucasus region of
Ingushetia, and several other African countries –
Mali,
Senegal, and
Mauritania. == See also ==