The initial setup in shatranj was essentially the same as in modern chess; however, the position of the white shah (king), on the right or left side was not fixed. Either the arrangement as in modern chess or as shown in the diagram were possible. In either case, the white and black shāh would be on the same file. The game was played with these pieces: •
Shāh ("king" in Persian) moves like the
king in chess. •
Ferz (Wazir) ("
counselor"; also spelled
fers; Arabic
firz, from Persian
farzīn) moves exactly one square diagonally, which makes it a rather weak piece. It was renamed "
queen" in Europe. Even today, the word for the queen piece is
ферзь (ferz) in Russian,
vezér in Hungarian,
vezir in Turkish,
vazīr in Persian and
wazīr in Arabic. It has analogue to the guards in
xiangqi. •
Rukh ("
chariot"; from Persian
rokh) moves like the
rook in chess. •
Pīl,
alfil,
aufin, and similar ("
elephant"; from Persian
pīl; al- is the
Arabic for "the") moves exactly two squares diagonally, jumping over the square between. Each pīl could reach only one-eighth of the squares on the board, and because their circuits were disjoint, they could never capture one another. This piece might have had a different move sometimes in
chaturanga, where the piece is also called "elephant". The pīl was replaced by the
bishop in modern chess. Even today, the word for the bishop piece is
alfil in Spanish,
alfiere in Italian,
fil in Turkish,
fīl in Persian and Arabic, and
слон ("elephant") in Russian. As chess spread from Iran northward to Russia, and westward into eastern Europe, south to Italy, and finally westward, it mostly retained the original name and look of the piece as an elephant. Usually, it was carved as a rounded shape with two blunt points representing the elephant's tusks. In Christian Europe, this piece became a bishop because the two points looked like a bishop's
mitre to those unfamiliar with elephants in Western Europe. An early example of the bishop being used is the
Lewis chessmen chess set of the 12th century. The elephant piece survives in
xiangqi with the limitations that the elephant in xiangqi cannot jump over an intervening piece and is restricted to the owner's half of the board. In
janggi, its movement was changed to become a slightly further-reaching version of the horse. •
Asb (Faras) (current meaning of "
horse" in Persian, from old Persian
Asp ()), moves like the
knight in chess. •
Piyadeh ("
infantryman"; from Persian
piyāde; also called
Sarbaz "
soldier") in Persian and adopted later to
Baydaq () in Arabic (a new singular extracted by treating the Persian form as an Arabic
broken plural), moves and captures like the
pawns in chess, but not moving two squares on the first move. When they reach the eighth rank, they are promoted to ferz. Pieces are shown on the diagrams and recorded in the notation using the equivalent modern symbols, as in the table above. In modern descriptions of shatranj, the names king, rook, knight and pawn are commonly used for shah, rukh, faras, and baidaq. However, the ferz and alfil are sometimes treated as distinct, and given their own symbols. Specific ferz and alfil symbols have been provisionally accepted for a future version of
Unicode. ian shatranj set, glazed
fritware, 12th century
Nishapur (
New York Metropolitan Museum of Art) There were also other differences compared to modern chess:
Castling was not allowed (it was invented much later).
Stalemating the opposing king resulted in a win for the player delivering stalemate. Capturing all one's opponent's pieces apart from the king (
baring the king) was a win, unless the opponent could capture the last piece on their next move, which was considered a draw in most places in the Islamic world (except for
Medina, where it was a win). The possible movements of the main shatranj pieces, excluding that of the king and pawn, are complementary to one another, and without any omission or redundancy occupy all available squares with respect to the central position of a 5x5 grid, as shown in the figure to the right. ==History==