Early classification The Galápagos Islands were discovered in 1535, but first appeared on the maps, of
Gerardus Mercator and
Abraham Ortelius, around 1570. The islands were named "Insulae de los Galopegos" (Islands of the Tortoises) in reference to the giant tortoises found there. Initially, the giant tortoises of the Indian Ocean and those from the Galápagos were thought to be the same subspecies. Naturalists thought that sailors had transported the tortoises there. In 1676, the pre-Linnaean authority
Claude Perrault referred to both subspecies as
Tortue des Indes. In 1783,
Johann Gottlob Schneider classified all giant tortoises as
Testudo indica ("Indian tortoise"). In 1812,
August Friedrich Schweigger named them
Testudo gigantea ("gigantic tortoise"). In 1834,
André Marie Constant Duméril and
Gabriel Bibron classified the Galápagos tortoises as a separate subspecies, which they named
Testudo nigrita ("black tortoise").
Recognition of subpopulations The first systematic survey of giant tortoises was by the zoologist
Albert Günther of the
British Museum, in 1875. This hypothesis was later disproven by the understanding that the Galápagos, the atolls of Seychelles, and the Mascarene islands are all of recent volcanic origin and have never been linked to a continent by land bridges. Galápagos tortoises are now thought to have descended from a South American ancestor, At the end of the 19th century,
Georg Baur recognised five more populations of Galápagos tortoise. In 1905–06, an expedition by the
California Academy of Sciences, with
Joseph R. Slevin in charge of reptiles, collected specimens which were studied by Academy herpetologist
John Van Denburgh. He identified four additional populations, and proposed the existence of 15 subspecies. Van Denburgh's list still guides the
taxonomy of the Galápagos tortoise, though now 10 populations are thought to have existed.
Current species and genus names The current specific designation of
niger, (originally spelled
nigra - meaning "black" - by
Quoy &
Gaimard, 1824 because it was in the feminine genus
Testudo) was resurrected as a valid species name in 1984 after it was discovered to be the senior
synonym (an older taxonomic synonym taking historical precedence) for the then commonly used subspecies name of
elephantopus ("elephant-footed" –
Harlan, 1827). Quoy and Gaimard's Latin description explains the use of
nigra: "Testudo toto corpore nigro" means "tortoise with completely black body". Quoy and Gaimard described it from a living specimen, but no evidence indicates they knew of its accurate provenance within the Galápagos – the locality was in fact given as California. Garman proposed synonymizing it with the extinct
Floreana subspecies. Later, Pritchard deemed it convenient to accept this designation, despite its tenuousness, for minimal disruption to the already confused nomenclature of the subspecies. The even more senior subspecies synonym of
californiana ("californian" –
Quoy &
Gaimard, 1824) is considered a
nomen oblitum ("forgotten name"). In most of the 1900s, the Galápagos tortoise was considered to belong to the genus
Geochelone, known as 'typical tortoises' or 'terrestrial turtles'. In the 1980s, the former subgenus
Chelonoidis was elevated to generic status, a conclusion later supported by
phylogenetic evidence which grouped the South American members of
Geochelone into an independent
clade (branch of the
tree of life). This nomenclature has been adopted by several authorities. The names of several species names in the genus
Chelonoidis, including this one, have often been misspelled, beginning in the 1980s when
Chelonoidis was elevated to genus and mistakenly treated as feminine rather than masculine, an error recognized and fixed in 2017.
Subspecies showing the ranges of currently recognized
Galápagos tortoise subspecies. Islands with extant subspecies are shaded yellow. Within the archipelago, 14-15 subspecies of Galápagos tortoises have been identified, although only 12 survive to this day. Five are found on separate islands; five of them on the volcanoes of
Isabela Island. Several of the surviving subspecies are seriously endangered. is thought to have been hunted to extinction by 1850, However, recent DNA testing shows that an intermixed, non-native population currently existing on the island of Isabela is of genetic resemblance to the subspecies native to Floreana, suggesting that
C. niger has not gone entirely extinct. Prior to widespread knowledge of the differences between the populations (sometimes called
races) from different islands and volcanoes, captive collections in zoos were indiscriminately mixed. Fertile offspring resulted from pairings of animals from different races. However, captive crosses between tortoises from different races have lower fertility and higher mortality than those between tortoises of the same race, and captives in mixed herds normally direct courtship only toward members of the same race. Prior to 2021, all subspecies were classified as distinct species from one another, but a 2021 study analyzing the level of divergence within the extinct West Indian
Chelonoidis radiation and comparing it to the Galápagos radiation found that the level of divergence within both clades may have been significantly overestimated, and supported once again reclassifying all Galápagos tortoises as subspecies of a single species,
C. niger. This was followed by the
Turtle Taxonomy Working Group and the
Reptile Database later that year. The taxonomic status of the various races is not fully resolved. •
Testudo californiana Quoy &
Gaimard, 1824a (
nomen dubium) •
Testudo clivosa Garman, 1917 •
Geochelone (
Chelonoidis)
elephantopus Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus Bour, 1980
C. n. nigra (
nominate subspecies) •
Testudo californiana Quoy &
Gaimard, 1824a
C. n. becki •
Testudo beckiRothschild, 1901 •
Testudo vicinaGünther, 1875 •
Testudo macrophyesGarman, 1917 (
nomen nudum) ;
Chelonoidis nigra nigra •
Testudo nigra Quoy & Gaimard, 1824 •
Testudo californiana Quoy & Gaimard, 1824 •
Testudo galapagoensis Baur, 1889 •
Testudo elephantopus galapagoensis Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Geochelone elephantopus galapagoensis Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis galapagoensis Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis nigra Bour, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus galapagoensis Obst, 1985 •
Geochelone nigra Pritchard, 1986 •
Geochelone nigra nigra Stubbs, 1989 •
Chelonoidis nigra galapagoensis David, 1994 •
Chelonoidis nigra nigra David, 1994 •
Geochelone elephantopus nigra Bonin, Devaux & Dupré, 1996 •
Testudo california Paull, 1998 (
ex errore) •
Testudo californianana Paull, 1999 (
ex errore) ;
Chelonoidis nigra abingdonii •
Testudo ephippium Günther, 1875 •
Testudo abingdonii Günther, 1877 •
Testudo abingdoni Van Denburgh, 1914 (
ex errore) •
Testudo elephantopus abingdonii Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Testudo elephantopus ephippium Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Geochelone abingdonii Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus abingdoni Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus ephippium Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone ephippium Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis abingdonii Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis ephippium Bour, 1980 •
Geochelone elephantopus abingdonii Groombridge, 1982 •
Geochelone abingdoni Fritts, 1983 •
Geochelone epphipium Fritts, 1983 (
ex errore) •
Chelonoidis nigra ephippium Pritchard, 1984 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus abingdoni Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus ephippium Obst, 1985 •
Geochelone nigra abingdoni Stubbs, 1989 •
Chelonoidis nigra abingdonii David, 1994 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus abingdonii Rogner, 1996 •
Chelonoidis nigra abingdonii Bonin, Devaux & Dupré, 1996 •
Chelonoidis nigra abdingdonii Obst, 1996 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone abdingdonii Obst, 1996 •
Geochelone nigra abdingdoni Obst, 1996 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone nigra ephyppium Caccone, Gibbs, Ketmaier, Suatoni & Powell, 1999 (
ex errore) •
Chelonoidis nigra ahingdonii Artner, 2003 (
ex errore) •
Chelonoidis abingdoni Joseph-Ouni, 2004 ;
Chelonoidis nigra becki •
Testudo becki Rothschild, 1901 •
Testudo bedsi Heller, 1903 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone becki Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus becki Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis becki Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus becki Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis nigra beckii David, 1994 (
ex errore) •
Chelonoidis elephantopus beckii Rogner, 1996 •
Chelonoidis nigra becki Obst, 1996 ;
Chelonoidis nigra chathamensis •
Testudo wallacei Rothschild, 1902 •
Testudo chathamensis Van Denburgh, 1907 •
Testudo elephantopus chathamensis Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Testudo elephantopus wallacei Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Testudo chatamensis Slevin & Leviton, 1956 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone chathamensis Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus chathamensis Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus wallacei Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone wallacei Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis chathamensis Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus chathamensis Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus wallacei Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus chatamensis Gosławski & Hryniewicz, 1993 •
Chelonoidis nigra chathamensis David, 1994 •
Chelonoidis nigra wallacei Bonin, Devaux & Dupré, 1996 •
Geochelone cathamensis Obst, 1996 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone elephantopus chatamensis Paull, 1996 •
Testudo chathamensis chathamensis Pritchard, 1998 •
Cherlonoidis nigra wallacei Wilms, 1999 •
Geochelone nigra chatamensis Caccone, Gibbs, Ketmaier, Suatoni & Powell, 1999 •
Geochelone nigra wallacei Chambers, 2004 ;
Chelonoidis nigra darwini •
Testudo wallacei Rothschild, 1902 •
Testudo darwini Van Denburgh, 1907 •
Testudo elephantopus darwini Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Testudo elephantopus wallacei Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Geochelone darwini Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus darwini Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus wallacei Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone wallacei Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis darwini Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus darwini Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus wallacei Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis nigra darwinii David, 1994 (
ex errore) •
Chelonoidis elephantopus darwinii Rogner, 1996 •
Chelonoidis nigra darwini Bonin, Devaux & Dupré, 1996 •
Chelonoidis nigra wallacei Bonin, Devaux & Dupré, 1996 •
Cherlonoidis nigra wallacei Wilms, 1999 •
Geochelone nigra darwinii Ferri, 2002 •
Geochelone nigra wallacei Chambers, 2004 ;
Chelonoidis nigra duncanensis •
Testudo duncanensis Garman, 1917 (
nomen nudum) •
Geochelone nigra duncanensis Stubbs, 1989 •
Geochelone nigra duncanensis Garman, 1996 •
Chelonoidis nigra duncanensis Artner, 2003 •
Chelonoidis duncanensis Joseph-Ouni, 2004 ;
Chelonoidis nigra hoodensis •
Testudo hoodensis Van Denburgh, 1907 •
Testudo elephantopus hoodensis Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Geochelone elephantopus hoodensis Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone hoodensis Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis hoodensis Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus hoodensis Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis nigra hoodensis David, 1994 ;
Chelonoidis nigra phantastica •
Testudo phantasticus Van Denburgh, 1907 •
Testudo phantastica Siebenrock, 1909 •
Testudo elephantopus phantastica Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Geochelone elephantopus phantastica Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone phantastica Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis phantastica Bour, 1980 •
Geochelone phantasticus Crumly, 1984 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus phantastica Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis nigra phantastica David, 1994 ;
Chelonoidis nigra porteri •
Testudo nigrita Duméril & Bibron, 1835 •
Testudo porteri Rothschild, 1903 •
Testudo elephantopus nigrita Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Geochelone elephantopus porteri Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone nigrita Pritchard, 1967 •
Chelonoidis nigrita Bour, 1980 •
Geochelone elephantopus nigrita Honegger, 1980 •
Geochelone porteri Fritts, 1983 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus nigrita Obst, 1985 •
Geochelone nigra porteri Stubbs, 1989 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus porteri Gosławski & Hryniewicz, 1993 •
Chelonoidis nigra nigrita David, 1994 •
Geochelone nigra perteri Müller & Schmidt, 1995 (
ex errore) •
Chelonoidis nigra porteri Bonin, Devaux & Dupré, 1996 ;
Chelonoidis nigra vicina •
Testudo elephantopus Harlan, 1827 •
Testudo microphyes Günther, 1875 •
Testudo vicina Günther, 1875 •
Testudo macrophyes Garman, 1917 •
Testudo vandenburghi de Sola, 1930 •
Testudo elephantopus elephantopus Mertens & Wermuth, 1955 •
Geochelone elephantopus Williams, 1960 •
Geochelone elephantopus elephantopus Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus guentheri Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus guntheri Pritchard, 1967 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone elephantopus microphyes Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus vandenburgi Pritchard, 1967 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone guntheri Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone microphyes Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone vandenburghi Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone vicina Pritchard, 1967 •
Geochelone elephantopus microphys Arnold, 1979 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone elephantopus vandenburghi Pritchard, 1979 •
Chelonoides elephantopus Obst, 1980 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis guentheri Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis microphyes Bour, 1980 •
Chelonoidis vandenburghi Bour, 1980 •
Geochelone guentheri Fritts, 1983 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus elephantopus Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus guentheri Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus microphyes Obst, 1985 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus vandenburghi Obst, 1985 •
Geochelone elephantopus vicina Swingland, 1989 •
Geochelone elephantopus vicini Swingland, 1989 (
ex errore) •
Chelonoidis elephantopus guntheri Gosławski & Hryniewicz, 1993 •
Chelonoidis nigra guentheri David, 1994 •
Chelonoidis nigra microphyes David, 1994 •
Chelonoidis nigra vandenburghi David, 1994 •
Geochelone nigra elephantopus Müller & Schmidt, 1995 •
Chelonoidis elephantopus vicina Rogner, 1996 •
Geochelone elephantopus vandenburghii Obst, 1996 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone vandenburghii Obst, 1996 •
Chelonoidis nigra microphyies Bonin, Devaux & Dupré, 1996 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone elephantopus microphytes Paull, 1996 (
ex errore) •
Geochelone elephantopus vandenbergi Paull, 1996 (
ex errore) •
Testudo elephantopus guntheri Paull, 1999 •
Chelonoidis nigra vicina Artner, 2003 •
Chelonoidis vicina Joseph-Ouni, 2004 •
Geochelone nigra guentheri Chambers, 2004 Modern
DNA methods have revealed new information on the relationships between the subspecies:
Isabela Island The five populations living on the largest island, Isabela, are the ones that are the subject of the most debate as to whether they are true subspecies or just distinct populations of a subspecies. It is widely accepted that the population living on the northernmost volcano, Volcan Wolf, is genetically independent from the four populations to the south and is therefore a separate subspecies. The fifth population living on the southernmost volcano (
C. n. vicina) is thought to have split off from the Sierra Negra population more recently and is therefore not as genetically different as the other two. Some tortoises from Isabela were found to be a partial match for the genetic profile of Floreana specimens from museum collections, possibly indicating the presence of
hybrids from a population transported by humans from Floreana to Isabela, or from individuals thrown overboard from ships to lighten the load. Furthermore, individuals from the subspecies possibly are still extant. Genetic analysis from a sample of tortoises from Volcan Wolf found 84 first-generation
C. n. niger hybrids, some less than 15 years old. The genetic diversity of these individuals is estimated to have required 38
C. n. niger parents, many of which could still be alive on Isabela Island.
Pinta Island at the
Charles Darwin Research Station, in 2006 The Pinta Island subspecies (
C. n. abingdonii, now extinct) has been found to be most closely related to the subspecies on the islands of San Cristóbal (
C. n. chathamensis) and Española (
C. n. hoodensis) which lie over 300 km (190 mi) away, This discovery informed further attempts to preserve the
C. n. abingdonii lineage and the search for an appropriate mate for
Lonesome George, which had been penned with females from Isabela. Hope was bolstered by the discovery of a
C. n. abingdonii hybrid male in the Volcán Wolf population on northern Isabela, raising the possibility that more undiscovered living Pinta descendants exist.
Santa Cruz Island Mitochondrial DNA studies of tortoises on Santa Cruz show up to three genetically distinct lineages found in nonoverlapping population distributions around the regions of Cerro Montura, Cerro Fatal, and La Caseta. Although traditionally grouped into a single subspecies (
C. n. porteri), the lineages are all more closely related to tortoises on other islands than to each other: Cerro Montura tortoises are most closely related to
C. n. duncanensis from Pinzón, Cerro Fatal to
C. n. chathamensis from San Cristóbal, Prior to the identification of this subspecies through genetic analysis, it was noted that there existed differences in shells between the Cerro Fatal tortoises and other tortoises on Santa Cruz. By classifying the Cerro Fatal tortoises into a new taxon, greater attention can be paid to protecting its habitat, according to Adalgisa Caccone, who is a member of the team making this classification.
Española Island On the southern island of Española, only 14 adult tortoises were found, two males and 12 females. The tortoises apparently were not encountering one another, so no reproduction was occurring. Between 1963 and 1974, all 14 adult tortoises discovered on the island were brought to the tortoise center on Santa Cruz and a tortoise breeding program was initiated. In 1977, a third Española male tortoise was returned to Galapagos from the San Diego Zoo and joined the breeding group. After 40 years' work reintroducing captive animals, a detailed study of the island's ecosystem has confirmed it has a stable, breeding population. Where once 15 were known, now more than 1,000 giant tortoises inhabit the island of Española. One research team has found that more than half the tortoises released since the first reintroductions are still alive, and they are breeding well enough for the population to progress onward, unaided. In January 2020, it was widely reported that
Diego, a 100-year-old male tortoise, resurrected 40% of the tortoise population on the island and is known as the "Playboy Tortoise".
Fernandina Island The
C. n. phantasticus subspecies from
Fernandina was originally known from a single specimen—an old male from the voyage of 1905–06. In 2019, an elderly female specimen was finally discovered on Fernandina and transferred to a breeding center, and trace evidence found on the expedition indicates that more individuals likely exist in the wild. It has been theorized that the rarity of the subspecies may be due to the harsh habitat it survives in, such as the
lava flows that are known to frequently cover the island. Later genetic studies of the bone fragments indicate that the Santa Fe subspecies was distinct, and was most closely related to
C. n. hoodensis.
Subspecies of doubtful existence The purported
Rábida Island subspecies (
C. n. wallacei) was described from a single specimen collected by the
California Academy of Sciences in December 1905, == Description ==