Box office The film opened first in the box office, making $16.1 million in its opening weekend. It displaced
Lost in Space, which was first in the box office for one week, after overtaking
Titanic, first for 15 weeks.
Titanic ranked third behind
City of Angels and
Lost in Space.
City of Angels reached the $100 million mark by October 26, 1998. It finished its run after grossing $78,685,114 in North America and $120 million in other territories, for a total of nearly $200 million. Writer
Craig Detweiler concluded the remake drew more viewers than the original.
Aggregated critical reception Meg Ryan received positive reviews for her performance. The film has a 58% score on
Rotten Tomatoes based on 60 reviews, with an average rating of 6.2/10. The site's consensus states: "
City of Angels may not tug the heartstrings as effortlessly as it aims to, but the end results will still leave more than a few viewers in tears." The film has a rating of 54 out of 100 on
Metacritic based on 22 reviews, indicating "mixed or average" reviews. Audiences polled by
CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B" on an A+ to F scale.
Professional critical reception Roger Ebert gave
City of Angels three stars, saying Meg Ryan was at her best here, but the film was "more of a formula story" than the original
Wings of Desire, and that many of its qualities were lifted from there. In
Variety,
Emanuel Levy positively reviewed Cage as "endlessly resourceful" and Ryan as "terrifically engaging". In
The Christian Science Monitor, Jennifer Wolcott compared it to
Ghost (1990) and
Contact (1997) as a U.S. film that could explore religion and love, highlighting Maggie's realization that her life will continue after the death of her blood cells, and that love is more than "a chemical reaction".
Sun-Sentinel reviewer Roger Hurlburt praised the acting, direction and "profound" feelings, and advised readers, "don't forget the
Kleenex". Wenders was satisfied with the adaptation of his work, remarking, "It's done with respect, with a sense of discovery all its own".
David Denby wrote in
New York that unlike Berlin, Los Angeles offers "the sunlit paradise" where people do not need convincing as to how nice life can be.
Entertainment Weekly gave the film a C, with Owen Gleiberman describing it as "a hymn to sappiness".
CNN's Paul Clinton dismissed the remake as a "schmaltzy" and "vapid" version of
Wings of Desire.
The Washington Posts Michael O'Sullivan dismissed it as "a mawkish debasement of its source material", asking "When will Hollywood learn to leave well enough alone?" Michael Wilmington gave it two and a half stars in the
Chicago Tribune, enjoying the appearance of the film but concluding it feels "forced and mechanically weepy".
Andrew Johnston writing in
Time Out New York concluded: "In the final reel, what began as a philosophical study of death and longing becomes a blatant tearjerker, but even then the accumulated momentum sweeps you along. Mainstream films are seldom more lyrical." In 2012,
Time included it in its Top ten On-Screen Depictions of Heaven list, for its portrayal of the "go toward the light" afterlife experience. In his
2015 Movie Guide,
Leonard Maltin gave it two and a half stars, judging it "still intriguing" though losing much of the atmosphere of the original. That year,
Indiewire, in reviewing remakes, called
City of Angels "a sickly bastardization" of its source material, though remarking Wenders himself was unable to duplicate its success with his 1993 sequel,
Faraway, So Close!. In 2017,
MSN included it in its 20 All-Time Worst Movie Remakes list, acknowledging it as a financial hit but "a schmaltzy tearjerker" compared to the poetry of the original.
Accolades City of Angels: Music from the Motion Picture received nominations at the
41st Grammy Awards, and the film received nominations and awards at ceremonies honoring cinema: ==See also==