An unfinished religious manifesto, , probably written by Milton, lays out many of his heterodox theological views, and was not discovered and published until 1823. Milton's key beliefs were idiosyncratic, not those of an identifiable group or faction, and often they go well beyond the orthodoxy of the time. Their tone, however, stemmed from the Puritan emphasis on the centrality and inviolability of conscience. He was his own man, but he was anticipated by
Henry Robinson in
Areopagitica.
Philosophy While Milton's beliefs are generally considered to be consistent with Protestant Christianity,
Stephen M. Fallon argues that by the late 1650s, Milton may have at least toyed with the idea of
monism or animist materialism, the notion that a single material substance which is "animate, self-active, and free" composes everything in the universe: from stones and trees and bodies to minds, souls, angels, and God. Fallon claims that Milton devised this position to avoid the
mind-body dualism of
Plato and
Descartes as well as the
mechanistic determinism of
Hobbes. According to Fallon, Milton's monism is most notably reflected in
Paradise Lost when he has angels eat (5.433–439) and apparently engage in sexual intercourse (8.622–629) and the
De Doctrina, where he denies the dual natures of man and argues for a theory of Creation
ex Deo. Fallon proposes that, in
Paradise Lost, Milton portrays humans and angels as being composed of the same basic material, in different degrees. He cites exemplary passages from Raphael's conversation with Adam in Book V, remarking that, for Milton, heavenly spirit is only a more highly perfected expression of earthly matter. Fallon also argues that the reproductive imagery in Milton's creation scene in Book VII points to matter as being animate. Milton's animist monism, as outlined by Fallon, might have become compromised by an increasing skepticism towards egalitarian politics at the end of his life. John Rogers suggests that the dead matter cast away in the Creation scene of
Paradise Lost represents an elitist break from monism and toward a hierarchical dualism between spiritual matter and its grosser counterpart.
Political thought Milton was a "passionately individual Christian Humanist poet." He appears on the pages of seventeenth-century English Puritanism, an age characterized as "the world turned upside down." He was a Puritan and yet was unwilling to surrender conscience to party positions on public policy. Thus, Milton's political thought, driven by competing convictions, a Reformed faith and a Humanist spirit, led to enigmatic outcomes.
Areopagitica'' was written in response to the Licensing Order, in November 1644. Milton's political thought may be best categorized according to respective periods in his life and times. The years 1641–42 were dedicated to church politics and the struggle against episcopacy. After his divorce writings,
Areopagitica, and a gap, he wrote in 1649–54 in the aftermath of the
execution of Charles I, and in polemic justification of the regicide and the existing Parliamentarian regime. Then in 1659–60 he foresaw the Restoration and wrote to head it off. Milton's own beliefs were in some cases unpopular, particularly his commitment to
republicanism. In the coming centuries, Milton would be claimed as an early apostle of liberalism. According to James Tully: A friend and ally in the pamphlet wars was
Marchamont Nedham.
Austin Woolrych considers that although they were quite close, there is "little real affinity, beyond a broad republicanism", between their approaches.
Blair Worden remarks that both Milton and Nedham, with others such as
Andrew Marvell and
James Harrington, would have taken their problem with the
Rump Parliament to be not the republic itself, but the fact that it was not a proper republic. Woolrych speaks of "the gulf between Milton's vision of the Commonwealth's future and the reality". In the early version of his
History of Britain, begun in 1649, Milton was already writing off the members of the
Long Parliament as incorrigible. He praised
Oliver Cromwell as the Protectorate was set up; though subsequently he had major reservations. When Cromwell seemed to be backsliding as a revolutionary, after a couple of years in power, Milton moved closer to the position of
Sir Henry Vane, to whom he wrote a sonnet in 1652. The group of disaffected republicans included, besides Vane,
John Bradshaw,
John Hutchinson,
Edmund Ludlow,
Henry Marten,
Robert Overton,
Edward Sexby and
John Streater; but not Marvell, who remained with Cromwell's party. Milton had already commended Overton, along with
Edmund Whalley and
Bulstrode Whitelocke, in
Defensio Secunda. Nigel Smith writes that As
Richard Cromwell fell from power, he envisaged a step towards a freer republic or "free commonwealth", writing in the hope of this outcome in early 1660. Milton had argued for an awkward position, in the
Ready and Easy Way, because he wanted to invoke the
Good Old Cause and gain the support of the republicans, but without offering a democratic solution of any kind. His proposal, backed by reference (amongst other reasons) to the
oligarchical Dutch and Venetian constitutions, was for a council with perpetual membership. This attitude cut right across the grain of popular opinion of the time, which swung decisively behind the restoration of the Stuart monarchy that took place later in the year. Milton, an associate of and advocate on behalf of the regicides, was silenced on political matters as Charles II returned. John Rogers has argued that Milton's views became more elitist after his early pamphlets. Losing faith in popular democracy, he began to favor government by a minority of competent citizens. Rogers presents this change as evident in
Paradise Lost. God's choice to use armed force against disobedient subjects echoes Milton's own endorsement of military suppression against the majority in the
Ready and Easy Way. However, Milton's Calvinism had to find expression in a broad-spirited Humanism. Like many
Renaissance artists before him, Milton attempted to integrate Christian theology with classical modes. In his early poems, the poet narrator expresses a tension between vice and virtue, the latter invariably related to Protestantism. In
Comus, Milton may make ironic use of the
Caroline court
masque by elevating notions of purity and virtue over the conventions of court revelry and superstition. In his later poems, Milton's theological concerns become more explicit. His use of biblical citation was wide-ranging; Harris Fletcher, standing at the beginning of the intensification of the study of the use of scripture in Milton's work (poetry and prose, in all languages Milton mastered), notes that typically Milton clipped and adapted biblical quotations to suit the purpose, giving precise chapter and verse only in texts for a more specialized readership. As for the plenitude of Milton's quotations from scripture, Fletcher comments, "For this work, I have in all actually collated about twenty-five hundred of the five to ten thousand direct Biblical quotations which appear therein". When citing and writing in other languages, he usually employed the Latin translation by
Immanuel Tremellius, though "he was equipped to read the Bible in Latin, in Greek, and in Hebrew, including the Targumim or Aramaic paraphrases of the Old Testament, and the Syriac version of the New, together with the available commentaries of those several versions". Milton embraced many heterodox Christian theological views. He has been accused of rejecting the
Trinity, believing instead that the Son was subordinate to the Father, a position known as
Arianism; and his sympathy or curiosity was probably engaged by
Socinianism: in August 1650 he licensed for publication by
William Dugard the
Racovian Catechism, based on a non-trinitarian creed. Milton's alleged Arianism, like much of his theology, is still the subject of debate and controversy.
Rufus Wilmot Griswold argued that "In none of his great works is there a passage from which it can be inferred that he was an Arian; and in the very last of his writings he declares that "the doctrine of the Trinity is a plain doctrine in Scripture." In
Areopagitica, Milton classified Arians and Socinians as "errorists" and "schismatics" alongside
Arminians and
Anabaptists. A source has interpreted him as broadly Protestant, if not always easy to locate in a more precise religious category. In 2019, John Rogers stated, "Heretics both, John Milton and Isaac Newton were, as most scholars now agree, Arians." In his 1641 treatise,
Of Reformation, Milton expressed his dislike for Catholicism and episcopacy, presenting Rome as a modern
Babylon, and bishops as Egyptian taskmasters. These analogies conform to Milton's puritanical preference for
Old Testament imagery. He knew at least four commentaries on
Genesis: those of
John Calvin,
Paulus Fagius,
David Pareus and
Andreus Rivetus. Through the
Interregnum, Milton often presents England, rescued from the trappings of a worldly monarchy, as an
elect nation akin to the Old Testament
Israel, and shows its leader,
Oliver Cromwell, as a latter-day
Moses. These views were bound up in Protestant views of the
Millennium, which some sects, such as the
Fifth Monarchists predicted would arrive in England. Milton, however, would later criticise the "worldly" millenarian views of these and others, and expressed orthodox ideas on the prophecy of the
Four Empires. The Restoration of the Stuart monarchy in 1660 began a new phase in Milton's work. In
Paradise Lost,
Paradise Regained and
Samson Agonistes, Milton mourns the end of the godly
Commonwealth. The
Garden of Eden may allegorically reflect Milton's view of England's recent
Fall from Grace, while
Samson's blindness and captivity—mirroring Milton's own lost sight—may be a metaphor for England's blind acceptance of
Charles II as king. Illustrated by
Paradise Lost is
mortalism, the belief that the soul lies dormant after the body dies. Despite the Restoration of the monarchy, Milton did not lose his personal faith;
Samson shows how the loss of national
salvation did not necessarily preclude the salvation of the individual, while
Paradise Regained expresses Milton's continuing belief in the promise of Christian salvation through Jesus Christ. Though he maintained his personal faith in spite of the defeats suffered by his cause, the
Dictionary of National Biography recounted how he had been alienated from the Church of England by Archbishop William Laud, and then moved similarly from the
Dissenters by their denunciation of religious tolerance in England. Writing of the enigmatic and often conflicting views of Milton in the Puritan age, David Daiches wrote,A fair theological summary may be that John Milton was a Puritan, though his tendency to press further for liberty of conscience, sometimes out of conviction and often out of mere intellectual curiosity, made the great man, at least, a vital if not uncomfortable ally in the broader Puritan movement. According to American historian William Hunter, "Milton argued for
disestablishment as the only effective way of achieving broad
toleration. Rather than force a man's conscience, government should recognise the persuasive force of the gospel."
Divorce Milton wrote
The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce in 1643, at the beginning of the English Civil War. In August of that year, he presented his thoughts to the
Westminster Assembly of Divines, which had been created by the
Long Parliament to bring greater reform to the Church of England. The Assembly convened on 1 July against the will of King Charles I. Milton's thinking on divorce caused him considerable trouble with the authorities. An orthodox Presbyterian view of the time was that Milton's views on divorce constituted a one-man
heresy: Even here, though, his originality is qualified:
Thomas Gataker had already identified "mutual solace" as a principal goal in marriage. Milton abandoned his campaign to legitimise divorce after 1645, but he expressed support for
polygamy in the , the theological treatise that provides the clearest evidence for his views. Milton wrote during a period when thoughts about divorce were anything but simplistic; rather, there was active debate among thinkers and intellectuals at the time. However, Milton's basic approval of divorce within strict parameters set by the biblical witness was typical of many influential Christian intellectuals, particularly the Westminster divines. Milton addressed the Assembly on the matter of divorce in August 1643, at a moment when the Assembly was beginning to form its opinion on the matter. In the
Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce, Milton argued that divorce was a private matter, not a legal or ecclesiastical one. Neither the Assembly nor Parliament condemned Milton or his ideas. In fact, when the Westminster Assembly wrote the Westminster Confession of Faith they allowed for divorce ('Of Marriage and Divorce,' Chapter 24, Section 5) in cases of infidelity or abandonment. Thus, the Christian community, at least a majority within the 'Puritan' sub-set, approved of Milton's views. Nevertheless, the reaction among Puritans to Milton's views on divorce was mixed.
Herbert Palmer, a member of the Westminster Assembly, condemned Milton in the strongest possible language: Palmer expressed his disapproval in a sermon addressed to the Westminster Assembly. The Scottish commissioner Robert Baillie described Palmer's sermon as one "of the most Scottish and free sermons that ever I heard anywhere".
History History was particularly important for the political class of the period, and Lewalski considers that Milton "more than most illustrates" a remark of
Thomas Hobbes on the weight placed at the time on the classical Latin historical writers
Tacitus,
Livy,
Sallust and
Cicero, and their republican attitudes. Milton himself wrote that "Worthy deeds are not often destitute of worthy relaters", in Book II of his
History of Britain. A sense of history mattered greatly to him: ==Legacy and influence==