Historical taxonomy Before the term 'lichen' was widely adopted, one of the earliest classification systems for these organisms was developed by the German botanist
Johann Jacob Dillenius. In his 1741 system,
Cladonia species were placed within the genus
Coralloides. In his
Species Plantarum,
Carl Linnaeus formally
described several species that are now classified within the Cladoniaceae. Although he initially placed them in the eponymously named genus
Lichen, a dozen of these species are recognised as belonging to the genus
Cladonia. Among these was
Cladonia pyxidata, a representative of the "pixie cup" or "trumpet" lichens—so named for their distinctive shape, as well as some well-known and widespread
Cladonia species:
C. coccifera,
C. cornuta,
C. deformis,
C. digitata,
C. fimbriata,
C. gracilis,
C. portentosa,
C. rangiferina,
C. stellaris,
C. subulata, and
C. uncialis. These 12 species represent about 14% of the 80
Lichen species Linnaeus described in his seminal 1753 work. The German naturalist
Jonathan Carl Zenker formally introduced the Cladoniaceae to science in 1827, with his work appearing in a publication edited by
Karl Goebel. Zenker's initial concept of the family included genera such as
Baeomyces,
Icmadophila, and
Stereocaulon, which have since been reclassified into separate families due to advances in taxonomic understanding.
William Nylander included 53
Cladonia species worldwide in his 1860 work
Synopsis lichenum. When
Edvard August Vainio published his three-volume
monograph on the Cladoniaceae (
Monographia Cladoniarum universalis, 1887, 1894, and 1897), he included 134 species and
subspecies. In his
circumscription of the family, the genera
Pycnothelia,
Cladia, and
Cladina were included in the genus
Cladonia. In recent history,
Teuvo Ahti's extensive research, including comprehensive monographs and revisions, has considerably advanced the understanding of Cladoniaceae taxonomy and
biogeography. Cladoniaceae is now one of the largest families of lichen-forming fungi, with about 560 species distributed amongst 18 genera. The
type genus is
Cladonia, circumscribed by the Irish physician and botanist
Patrick Browne in 1756. He included eight species in his new genus. Of their occurrence, he wrote: "All these species are found in great abundance in the mountains of
Liguanea: they grow mostly on the ground, among other sorts of moss, but a few ... species chiefly are found upon the decaying trunks of trees."
Etymology and naming As is
standard practice in
botanical nomenclature, the name
Cladoniaceae is based on the name of the type genus,
Cladonia, with the ending indicating the
rank of family. The genus name comprises the
Greek word: (
klādos), meaning "branch", "bud", or "shoot"; and the
Latin -ia, a
suffix commonly used in Latin to form nouns, particularly in taxonomy to denote genera. It is well known that reindeer feed on lichens, which has led to the widespread but misleading name "reindeer moss". This
common name, along with "reindeer lichen" and "caribou lichen", is typically applied to the ground-dwelling, mat-forming species that were previously classified in the genus
Cladina.
Cladonia species with cup-shaped structures borne at the tips of vertical stalks (podetia) are often known as "pixie cups". Examples include the "boreal pixie cup" (
C. borealis), the "finger pixie cup" (
C. digitata), and the "red-fruited pixie cup" (
C. pleurota) Additional names alluding to these characteristic structures include the "powdered funnel lichen" (
C. cenotea), and the "trumpet lichen" (
C. fimbriata). Some names reference the reddish hue of their fruiting structures, such as "British soldiers" (
C. cristatella), the "jester lichen" (
C. leporina), and the "lipstick powderhorn" (
C. macilenta).
Phylogenetics |2=
Cladia aggregata |3=
Cladia sullivanii }} }}}} }}
Molecular phylogenetics studies have greatly advanced the scientific understanding of relationships within the Cladoniaceae, particularly in the large and diverse genus
Cladonia. Early studies in the early 2000s began to reveal the complexity of relationships within the family, challenging traditional morphology-based classifications. More recent comprehensive analyses have identified 13 major
clades within
Cladonia, providing a framework for understanding the genus's evolution and diversity. These clades, while generally well-supported by molecular data, often lack clear morphological
synapomorphies (shared physical characteristics inherited from a
common ancestor), highlighting the challenges in
Cladonia taxonomy. Some clades, such as clade Erythrocarpae (characterised by red apothecia) and clade Ochroleucae (with pale
ochraceous apothecia), do share distinctive features. However, most clades encompass a wide range of morphological and chemical variation. Within these clades, several
species complexes have been identified, such as the
Cladonia gracilis group and the
Cladonia humilis group. These complexes often include morphologically similar species that are difficult to distinguish based on traditional taxonomic characters. Molecular studies have revealed that many of these complexes contain
cryptic diversity, with genetically distinct lineages that are not easily recognisable morphologically. Focused molecular studies have further refined the understanding of specific groups within Cladoniaceae. For instance, detailed analyses of the
Cladonia furcata complex have revealed high levels of
homoplasy (the occurrence of similar traits due to
convergent evolution rather than shared ancestry) in the morphological characters traditionally used for species delimitation. Similarly, studies on the
Cladonia cariosa group and the
Cladonia pyxidata group have uncovered previously unrecognised diversity and highlighted the need for integrative approaches combining molecular, morphological, and chemical data in species delimitation. These phylogenetic studies have also shed light on biogeographic patterns within Cladoniaceae. For example, some clades show distinct geographic distributions, such as a group of predominantly African species within clade Perviae, while others have more
cosmopolitan distributions. Morphologically distinct genera like
Carassea,
Pycnothelia, and
Metus form a sister clade to
Cladonia. These genera share some morphological and chemical traits, such as dimorphic thalli and the production of
atranorin. However, their geographic distributions vary, with
Carassea being
endemic to Brazil, while
Pycnothelia has a bipolar distribution (i.e., found in the high latitudes of both hemispheres) and
Metus is found primarily in Australasia. A 2026 multilocus study provided the first time-calibrated phylogeny focused on the Cladoniaceae. It suggested that the family originated in the
Late Cretaceous (roughly 70–80 million years ago), while
Cladonia itself began diversifying in the
Early Eocene (around 50 million years ago). Although the inferred ages varied somewhat between
datasets and some deeper nodes remained uncertain, most of the major clades within
Cladonia were estimated to have diversified during the
Miocene (roughly 5–23 million years ago), linking the family's radiation to major
Cenozoic climatic changes.
Genomics Genomic studies have revealed extensive variation in the size and structure of
mitochondrial DNA in Cladoniaceae, uncovering considerable diversity in
genome size and structure. Within the genus
Cladonia, mitochondrial genomes span from approximately 45,000 to 66,000
base pairs, consistently containing
respiratory genes and
ribosomal RNA regions across all examined species. Crustose lichens tend to have smaller mitochondrial genomes compared to their fruticose and foliose counterparts. The genomes often harbour
homing endonuclease genes, which may influence
genomic evolution. Notably, substantial intraspecific variation has been observed, particularly in widespread species such as
C. rangiferina and
C. submitis. Unlike some other symbiotic organisms, Cladoniaceae do not exhibit mitochondrial genome reduction, suggesting complex evolutionary dynamics.
Synonymy Several
phylogenetic studies have shown that Cladoniaceae is a member of the order
Lecanorales, and is closely related to the family
Stereocaulaceae. The family Cetradoniaceae, which was created in 2002 to contain the endangered species
Cetradonia linearis, was folded into the Cladoniaceae in 2006. In 2018, Ekaphan Kraichak and colleagues used a technique called temporal banding to reorganise the
Lecanoromycetes, proposing a revised system of classification based on correlating taxonomic rank with geological (evolutionary) age. They
synonymised the families Squamarinaceae and
Stereocaulaceae with the Cladoniaceae, resulting in a large increase in the number of genera and species. The Squamarinaceae had already been included in the Cladoniaceae by previous authors. Although this reorganisation has been used in some later publications, the folding of the Stereocaulaceae into the Cladoniaceae was not accepted in a recent analysis.
Robert Lücking highlighted that merging the two families under the name Cladoniaceae is not permissible without a formal
conservation proposal because Stereocaulaceae, established in 1826, predates Cladoniaceae, which was established in 1827. According to the
rules of botanical nomenclature, the earliest validly published name has
priority and must be used when two families are combined unless an exception is granted. This means that if the families were merged without a conservation proposal, the combined family would have to be named Stereocaulaceae due to its earlier establishment. In a 2021 treatment of the British and Irish Cladoniaceae, the authors also keep these families separate, noting "both families are monophyletic and easily distinguishable on both morphological and molecular terms". ==Description==