Eleven months after Brandley was convicted and
sentenced to death, his appellate lawyers discovered that
exculpatory evidence had disappeared while in prosecution custody. This included a
Caucasian pubic hair and other hairs recovered from Fergeson's body that were neither hers nor Brandley's. Also missing were photographs taken of Brandley when he was arrested on the day of the crime. These showed that he was not wearing the belt that the prosecution claimed had been the murder weapon. The missing evidence was all the more troubling combined with the pretrial destruction of the spermatozoa. Appellate briefs stressed the willful destruction and disappearance of potentially exculpatory evidence in Brandley's case, but the
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction and death sentence without mentioning this issue. "No reasonable hypothesis is presented by the evidence to even suggest that someone other than [Brandley] committed the crime", said the court.
Brandley V. Texas, 691 S.W.2d 699 (1985). Brenda Medina, who lived in the nearby town of
Cut and Shoot, Texas, saw a television broadcast about the Brandley case. Saying she had been unaware of the case until then, she told a neighbor that her former live-in boyfriend, James Dexter Robinson, had told her in 1980 that he had committed such a crime. Robinson had previously worked as a janitor at Conroe High School. Medina said she had not believed Robinson then, but with the current publicity, she did. At the neighbor's suggestion, Medina consulted an attorney, who took her to see District Attorney Peter Speers III. (He had succeeded Keeshan after the latter ascended to the Texas District Court bench.) Speers concluded that Medina was unreliable. He decided therefore that he had no obligation to inform Brandley's lawyers. The private attorney she had consulted thought otherwise, and brought her to the attention of the defense.
State habeas corpus sought After obtaining Medina's sworn statement, Brandley's lawyers petitioned the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of
habeas corpus. The court ordered an evidentiary hearing, which was conducted by District Court Judge Ernest A. Coker. Before calling Medina to testify at the evidentiary hearing, Brandley's defense team called Edward Payne, father-in-law of Gary Acreman. He was one of the school custodians who had testified at both Brandley trials, and the defense now suspected he may have been a co-perpetrator of the crime with Robinson. Payne testified that Acreman had told him where Fergeson's clothes had been hidden two days before the authorities found them. After Medina related details of Robinson's purported confession, Brandley's lawyers called John Sessum, the custodian who had testified at the first trial but not the second. Sessum contradicted what he had said at the first trial. He stated that he had seen Acreman follow Cheryl Fergeson up a staircase leading to the auditorium and then heard her scream, "No" and "Don't." Later that day, Acreman warned Sessum not to tell anyone what he had seen. But Sessum said that he had told Wesley Styles, the
Texas Ranger who was leading the investigation. According to Sessum, Styles threatened him with arrest if he did not testify consistently with Acreman's.
Community activism and result Judge Coker recommended that Brandley be denied a new trial. A date had been set for Brandley's execution. Coker's ruling was accepted by the Court of Criminal Appeals on December 22, 1986. But civil rights activists, including Reverend
Jew Don Boney, had organized and raised $80,000 to help finance further legal efforts on Brandley's behalf. The Rev. Boney was the chairman of the "Coalition to Free Clarence Lee Brandley", based in
Houston. He led community efforts to have Brandley receive a fair trial. Interviewed on numerous national news outlets, Boney attracted significant media and community attention to the case. National Advocate
James McCloskey, of
Centurion Ministries in
Princeton, New Jersey, also took on the case. Working with a
private investigator, McCloskey soon obtained a video-taped statement by Acreman stating that Robinson had killed Cheryl Fergeson and that he had seen Robinson place her clothes in the
dumpster where they were later found. That is how Acreman knew where the clothes were before law enforcement found them. Although Acreman soon recanted that video statement, two witnesses had come forward attesting that they had heard Acreman say he knew who killed Fergeson, and that it was not Brandley. They also said that Acreman had said he would never reveal the girl's killer. Based on these statements, with Brandley's scheduled execution six days away, Coker granted a stay.
A fair hearing After further investigation, Brandley's lawyers petitioned for another evidentiary hearing. The Court of Criminal Appeals granted this on June 30, 1987. The new hearing was conducted by Special State District Judge Perry Pickett. Robinson, Acreman, and Styles testified for the prosecution. Robinson admitted he had told Brenda Medina in 1980 that he had killed the young woman in Conroe, but claimed he had said that only to frighten Medina. She had been pressuring him because she was pregnant, he said, and he wanted her to leave him alone. Acreman persisted with his previous trial testimony, but did admit that Robinson had been at Conroe High School on the morning of the murder. Evidence established that both Robinson and Acreman, unlike Brandley, had Type A blood, which was consistent with that found on Fergeson's blouse. Texas Ranger Styles acknowledged that even before he had interviewed any witnesses, Brandley was his only suspect. When pressed about why he had not obtained a hair sample from Acreman to compare with the Caucasian pubic hair and other hairs found on the victim, Styles stammered, "Let's say I didn't do it and it wasn't done, and why it wasn't done, I don't know." On October 9, 1987, Judge Pickett recommended that the Court of Criminal Appeals grant Brandley a new trial, declaring: The litany of events graphically described by the witnesses, some of it chilling and shocking, leads me to the conclusion the pervasive shadow of darkness has obscured the light of fundamental decency and human rights." Pickett went on to say, that in his thirty-year career, "no case has presented a more shocking scenario of the effects of racial prejudice, perjured testimony, witness intimidation [and] an investigation the outcome of which was predetermined. After 14 months, the Court of Criminal Appeals accepted Picket's recommendation with a sharply split
en banc decision on December 13, 1989 (
Ex Parte Brandley, 781 S.W.2d 886 (1989)). The prosecution appealed, delaying disposition of the case another 10 months. But within hours of the
U.S. Supreme Court's denial of
certiorari on October 1, 1990 (
Texas v. Brandley, 498 U.S. 817 (1990)), they dropped all charges. Brandley was released from state prison. A few months later he was ordained as a
Baptist minister. Within the year, he married. ==Child support==