In topology Topologists have long studied notions of "good subspace embedding", many of which imply that the map is a cofibration, or the converse, or have similar formal properties with regards to homology. In 1937, Borsuk proved that if X is a
binormal space (X is normal, and its product with the unit interval X\times I is normal) then every closed subspace of X has the homotopy extension property with respect to any absolute neighborhood retract. Likewise, if A is a closed subspace of X and the subspace inclusion A\times I \cup X\times {1}\subset X\times I is an absolute neighborhood retract, then the inclusion of A into X is a cofibration. Hatcher's introductory textbook
Algebraic Topology uses a technical notion of
good pair which has the same long exact sequence in singular homology associated to a cofibration, but it is not equivalent. The notion of cofibration is distinguished from these because its homotopy-theoretic definition is more amenable to formal analysis and generalization. If f:X \to Y is a continuous map between topological spaces, there is an associated topological space Mf called the
mapping cylinder of f. There is a canonical subspace embedding i: X\to Mf and a projection map r: Mf\to Y such that r\circ i = f as pictured in the commutative diagram below. Moreover, i is a cofibration and r is a homotopy equivalence. This result can be summarized by saying that "every map is equivalent in the homotopy category to a cofibration." : Arne Strøm has proved a strengthening of this result, that every map f:X \to Y factors as the composition of a cofibration and a homotopy equivalence which is also a
fibration. A topological space X with distinguished basepoint x is said to be
well-pointed if the inclusion map {x}\to X is a cofibration. The inclusion map S^{n-1} \to D^n of the boundary sphere of a solid disk is a cofibration for every n. A frequently used fact is that a cellular inclusion is a cofibration (so, for instance, if (X, A) is a
CW pair, then A \to X is a cofibration). This follows from the previous fact and the fact that cofibrations are stable under pushout, because pushouts are the gluing maps to the n-1 skeleton.
In chain complexes Let \mathcal{A} be an
Abelian category with enough projectives. If we let C_+(\mathcal{A}) be the category of chain complexes which are 0 in degrees q , then there is a model category structurepg 1.2 where the weak equivalences are the
quasi-isomorphisms, the fibrations are the epimorphisms, and the cofibrations are mapsi:C_\bullet \to D_\bulletwhich are degreewise monic and the cokernel complex \text{Coker}(i)_\bullet is a complex of
projective objects in \mathcal{A}. It follows that the cofibrant objects are the complexes whose objects are all projective.
Simplicial sets The category \textbf{SSet} of simplicial setspg 1.3 there is a model category structure where the fibrations are precisely the Kan fibrations, cofibrations are all injective maps, and weak equivalences are simplicial maps which become homotopy equivalences after applying the geometric realization functor. ==Properties==