Game and crop damage Common raccoon dogs are harmful to
game bird populations, particularly in
floodplains and the shorelines of
estuaries, where they feed almost exclusively on eggs and chicks during the spring period. Birds amount to 15–20% of their diets in Lithuania, 46% on the
Oka River floodlands, and 48.6% in the Voronezh Reserve. They are also harmful to the
muskrat trade, destroying their nests and eating their young. In Ukraine, common raccoon dogs are harmful to
kitchen gardens,
melon cultivations,
vineyards, and
corn seedlings. Generally, the quality of the pelt is based on the silkiness of the fur, as its physical appeal depends upon the guard hairs being erect, which is only possible in silkier furs. Small common raccoon dog pelts with silky fur command higher prices than large, coarse-furred ones. Due to their long and coarse guard hairs and their woolly fur fibre, which has a tendency to felt or mat, common raccoon dog pelts are used almost exclusively for fur trimmings. Japanese raccoon dog pelts, though smaller than other geographic variants, are the most valued variety, with specimens from
Amur and
Heilongjiang coming close behind, while Korean and southern Chinese are the least valued. When raised in captivity, common raccoon dogs can produce of wool of slightly lesser quality than that of
goats. The common raccoon dog comprises 11% of all animals hunted in Japan. Twenty percent of domestically produced fur in Russia is from the common raccoon dog.
Misrepresentation as artificial fur In several widely publicized incidents, clothing advertised and sold as having synthetic
faux fur, were documented as actually containing real fur from common raccoon dogs. On 22 December 2006, MSNBC reported
Macy's had pulled from its shelves and its website two styles of
Sean John hooded jackets, originally advertised as featuring
faux fur, after an investigation concluded garments were actually made from common raccoon dog. On 24 April 2008, the
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) filed a false-advertising complaint with the
US Federal Trade Commission alleging at least 20 retailers in the U.S. had been mislabeling common raccoon dog fur. They assert 70% of fur garments they tested were common raccoon dog, but were mislabeled as
faux fur,
coyote,
rabbit, or other animals. In December 2009,
Lord & Taylor announced new regulations banning the sale of common raccoon dog fur in its stores. On 19 March 2013, three U.S. retailers settled lawsuits with the U.S. government following an investigation that confirmed they had been selling common raccoon dog fur, but labeling it as fake ('faux') fur.
Neiman Marcus, DrJays.com, and Eminent (Revolve Clothing) reached settlements with the U.S.
Federal Trade Commission that do not incur financial penalties unless they mislabel the fur again. On 19 September 2014, the HSUS announced Kohl's had been selling common raccoon dog fur as faux fur. == See also ==