During the campaign in 2016,
Marchezan Junior denied that he had any intention of privatizing Carris. However, in June 2017, the mayor stated that Carris could be privatized. The following month, he again maintained that the company should be privatized or that it should bid out lines. In June 2018, the city government hired a consulting firm to analyze Carris and the mayor again argued that privatization was one of the options for the company. Marchezan's successor, Sebastião Melo, continued the privatization project. Amidst many protests by employees and the community, the privatization of Carris was approved by the City Council on September 8, 2021, authorizing the city to sell its assets and grant the lines to private companies. The eight amendments, all from the opposition, were rejected. The city may also "concede, in whole or in part, its participation in the company, the control of shares on the stock exchange, its power to decide on its behalf and to choose who will run the company, transform, merge, divide, slice, incorporate, liquidate, dissolve, extinguish or deactivate the company. It even has the right to accept to be replaced when it comes time to enjoy some benefit or receive some credit from some financing". In short, the main argument was that the company was loss-making, outdated, and unable to adapt to new demands. The city government claimed that in 2022 it would have to invest half a billion
reais to cover the accumulated debts. The Union of Federal Judiciary and Public Ministry Workers in Rio Grande do Sul published a note claiming that the official justifications are lies and part of a process "that resonates with the destruction promoted at the federal level by the government of
Jair Bolsonaro". Carris is "a city's patrimony and fundamental for the search for transport democratization". Fabricio Loguércio, director of the union, said that "the fight in defense of the public Carris is, in fact, a fight in defense of public transportation. Carris, founded in 1872, was once an example of public transportation. It has won awards as the best public transportation company in Brazil. It has always served to regulate the system in Porto Alegre. However, after a sequence of disastrous administrations, with several corruption scandals (according to the media), it was being scrapped. Despite all this, it is still the best one in Porto Alegre". According to André Augustin, from the
Observatório das Metrópoles,Unfortunately, in the last few years, the successive neoliberal administrations at Porto Alegre's City Hall have promoted its destruction. The quality fell, but even so it remained above the competition. In 2021, the average age of the Carris fleet was 5.2 years, against 7.7 years for the private companies (above the allowed by law). In addition, 94% of Carris buses had air conditioning, against 41% of the private ones. It was also Carris that saved the bus system during the pandemic, when private companies broke contracts and started abandoning the most loss-making lines. To guarantee the right to transportation, foreseen in the Constitution, Carris took over these lines - in an indirect subsidy to its competitors, who could operate only the profitable lines. This made Carris's losses increase, which was used as an argument by the mayor Sebastião Melo to end Carris. The losses arose after Fortunati handed over the management of Carris to the PMDB, the party of his vice-president, Sebastião Melo. Among other scandals, more than one and a half million
reais were embezzled by the company's financial coordinator, who then made several donations to his party's campaigns, including Melo's own. When he became mayor, Sebastião Melo used the damage started during his term as vice-mayor to argue that Carris could no longer be public. Then, he sent a bill to the City Council asking not for privatization, but a carte blanche to do whatever he wanted to destroy Carris. [...] Just as happened a century ago, transportation and sanitation must serve not to meet the needs of the population, but to guarantee the profits of the providers of these services and also help the valuation of urban land. It is not, therefore, an absence of the state, but a strong state action to build a city that generates profit for certain sectors. == Presidents ==