Latvia was one of the early post
World War I nations which adopted some ideas from the 1919
Weimar Constitution.
Liberal lawyer
Hugo Preuß (Preuss) is often attributed as the author of the draft version of the
constitution that was passed by the
Weimar National Assembly, which historian
William L. Shirer in a book
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich regards as "the most liberal and democratic document of its kind the twentieth century had ever seen ... full of ingenious and admirable devices which seemed to guarantee the working of an almost flawless democracy.". In Latvia some early law experts such as Kārlis Dišlers, Fēlikss Cielēns and modern day
jurists agree that Weimar Constitution was underlying the wording of the Constitution of Latvia (Satversme), and in some way is a synthesis between the Weimar Constitution and
Westminster system used in the
United Kingdom. Some similarities between Weimar Constitution and Latvian are: • The establishment of
state institutions of the
Weimar Republic and the Republic of Latvia, which began with the establishment of a pre-parliament, which in Germany was
Council of the People's Deputies, in Latvia -
People's Council of Latvia. • The adoption of the
election law in Germany - ''The Law of the Council of People's Deputies of 29 November 1918 on the elections of the National Assembly
, in Latvia - The Law of the People's Council of 19 August 1919 on Elections of the Constitutional Assembly'' • The creation of governmental institution which members are elected by the people whose aim is to draft a constitution. In Germany it was -
The Weimar National Assembly convened on February 6, 1919. In Latvia -
The Constitutional Assembly, convened on May 1, 1920. • Latvia, similarly to the Weimar Republic, adopted a temporary constitutional laws, in the Weimar Republic
Law on Provisional State Power (Das Gesetz über die vorläufige Staatsgewalt), in Latvia,
Declaration on the State of Latvia and
Provisions of the Latvian State, in order to regulate relations in the state prior the constitution • Within the process of drafting the constitution, a special commission was established, in Germany - "Constitutional Commission of the National Assembly" (
Verfassungskommission), in Latvia - "Constitutional Commission of the Constitutional Assembly" • The
Social Democrats were widely represented in both the National Assembly in Weimar and the Constitutional Assembly in Latvia. The
Latvian Social Democrats had close ties with Germany, which made it easier to access and exchange information of ideas with the new Weimar Republic. This is sometimes evidenced by the very similar arguments of the Social Democrats in the process of drafting the constitution:
Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany (USPD) warned that the President should not be given unlimited powers, as the President was perceived as a kind of "substitute
kaiser". In Latvia, the Latvian Social Democrats defended the principle that the president ideologically is the
heir to the
monarch). During the drafting of the
Satversme, the Weimar Constitution was the most modern and
progressive system of constitutional control at the time. The German republic system chosen as the Weimar Constitution corresponded to the ideas of national and statehood ideas of Latvia as well. The
historical influence of Germany, including legal, in the Latvian territory, with its significant influence on the legal consciousness of the
Latvian people, allowed to take over the norms of the Weimar Constitution not only formally, but also to envisage their settlement in the general population and society.
German, being one of the
working languages in the Constitutional Assembly in Latvia and as a widely known language at that place and time, contributed to the choice of the Weimar Constitution as a system for the
Satversme. According to the transcripts of the meetings of the Constitutional Assembly, the deputies of the Constitutional Assembly sometimes referred to
Satversme as a derivation of the Weimar Constitution, especially to the draft Part II of the Satversme. Comparing the Weimar Constitution and the Latvian Constitution adopted in 1922, it can be noticed that the Constitution does not contain fundamental human rights. At the same time, the failure to accept Part II of the Satversme is not a deliberate abandonment of the model of the Weimar Constitution, but the reason for not accepting it is a political dispute over the content of individual rights. == Overview ==