The film was negatively received at the time of its release;
Vincent Canby of
The New York Times noted that "Peter Cushing ... brings a certain seedy grandeur to the role," but dismissed the film as "silly," particularly due to the contemporary setting. A review in
Variety called it a "Fair horror picture ... [that] suffers from poor writing, plus often sluggish direction." The film has been better received in recent years as a
cult film, sometimes enjoyed for its
camp value. Critic Paul Chambers wrote: "Silly, but entertaining. That’s the best way to describe
Corruption, the story of a wealthy surgeon during the swinging 1960s who would do anything to keep his young girlfriend happy ...
Corruption is a hoot. It was made in the late 1960s and authentically depicts London’s free love and hip culture that was later lampooned in the
Austin Powers comedies. Only this film was intended to be a serious horror flick and the costumes and sets are all that more enjoyable because ... well, just because. Peter Cushing is over-the-top crazy in this grindhouse-style goreathon. It’s hard to imagine the filmmakers didn’t know the end product would be campy. But, that makes little difference to today’s audience. I see
Corruption as a time capsule, of sorts." Critic John Beifuss wrote: "Probably the imperfect jewel of British director Robert Hartford-Davis's oddball filmography...
Corruption had been perhaps the rarest of horror superstar Peter Cushing's many, many genre movies until the October appearance of this beautifully remastered and restored edition from
Grindhouse Releasing, a company that exceeds even the Criterion Collection in its determination to create the definitive editions of the titles it licenses ... A truly wacked-out work of art." ==See also==