MarketCoup d'état
Company Profile

Coup d'état

A coup d'état, or simply a coup, is typically an illegal and overt attempt by a military organization or other government elites to unseat an incumbent person or leadership. A self-coup is said to take place when a leader, having come to power through legal means, tries to stay in power through illegal means.

Etymology
The term comes from French , literally meaning a 'stroke of state' or 'blow of state'. In French, the word () is capitalized when it denotes a sovereign political entity. Although the concept of a coup d'état has featured in politics since antiquity, the phrase is of relatively recent coinage. It did not appear within an English text before the 19th century except when used in the translation of a French source, there being no simple phrase in English to convey the contextualized idea of a 'knockout blow to the existing administration within a state'. One early use within text translated from French was in 1785 in a printed translation of a letter from a French merchant, commenting on an arbitrary decree, or , issued by the French king restricting the import of British wool. What may be its first published use within a text composed in English is an editor's note in the London Morning Chronicle, 1804, reporting the arrest by Napoleon in France, of Moreau, Berthier, Masséna, and Bernadotte: "There was a report in circulation yesterday of a sort of coup d'état having taken place in France, in consequence of some formidable conspiracy against the existing government." In the British press, the phrase came to be used to describe the various murders by Napoleon's alleged secret police, the , who executed the Duke of Enghien: "the actors in torture, the distributors of the poisoning draughts, and the secret executioners of those unfortunate individuals or families, whom Bonaparte's measures of safety require to remove. In what revolutionary tyrants call ''grand[s] coups d'état'', as butchering, or poisoning, or drowning, en masse, they are exclusively employed." == Related terms ==
Related terms
Self-coup Soft coup A soft coup, sometimes referred to as a silent coup or a bloodless coup, is an illegal overthrow of a government that unlike a regular coup d'état is achieved without the use of force or violence. Palace coup A palace coup or palace revolution is a coup in which one faction within the ruling group displaces another faction within a ruling group. Along with popular protests, palace coups are a major threat to dictators. The Harem conspiracy of the 12th century BC was one of the earliest attempts. Palace coups were common in Imperial China. They have also occurred among the Habsburg dynasty in Austria, the Al-Thani dynasty in Qatar, and in Haiti in the 19th to early 20th centuries. The majority of Russian tsars between 1725 and 1801 either usurped power or were overthrown in palace coups. Putsch The term putsch ([pʊtʃ], from Swiss German for 'knock') denotes the political-military actions of a minority reactionary coup. The term was initially coined for the of 6 September 1839 in Switzerland. It was also used for attempted coups in Weimar Germany, such as the 1920 Kapp Putsch, Küstrin Putsch, and Adolf Hitler's 1923 Beer Hall Putsch. The 1934 Night of the Long Knives was Hitler's purge to eliminate opponents, particularly the paramilitary faction led by Ernst Röhm, but Nazi propaganda justified it as preventing a supposed putsch planned or attempted by Röhm. The Nazi term is still used by Germans to describe the event, often with quotation marks as the "so-called Röhm Putsch". The 1961 Algiers putsch and the 1991 August Putsch in the Soviet Union also use the term. The 2023 Wagner Group rebellion has also been described as a putsch. and '''''' () is a term of Spanish origin for a type of coup d'état. Specifically the is the formal declaration deposing the previous government and justifying the installation of the new government by the . Edward Luttwak distinguishes a coup, in which a military or political faction takes power for itself, from a , in which the military deposes the existing government and hands over power to a new, ostensibly civilian government. A "barracks revolt" or is another type of military revolt, from the Spanish term ('quarter' or 'barracks'), in which the mutiny of specific military garrisons sparks a larger military revolt against the government. Other Other types of actual or attempted seizures of power are sometimes called "coups with adjectives". The appropriate term can be subjective and carries normative, analytical, and political implications. • Electoral coup • Judicial coup, a "legal" coup, utilizing the judiciary as the main instrument. • Market coup • Medical coup, having a leader declared incapacitated by doctors, such as in Tunisia in 1987 • Military coup • Parliamentary coup • Presidential coup • Royal coup, in which a monarch dismisses democratically elected leaders and seizes all power (e.g. the 6 January Dictatorship by Alexander I of Yugoslavia) • Slow-motion (or slow-moving or slow-rolling) coup Revolution, rebellion While a coup is usually a conspiracy of a small group, a revolution or rebellion is usually started spontaneously by larger groups of uncoordinated people. The distinction between a revolution and a coup is not always clear. Sometimes, a coup is labelled as a revolution by its plotters to feign democratic legitimacy. == Prevalence and history ==
Prevalence and history
According to Clayton Thyne and Jonathan Powell's coup data set, there were 457 coup attempts from 1950 to 2010, of which 227 (49.7%) were successful and 230 (50.3%) were unsuccessful. Its findings show that while such a strategy is sufficient for gathering information on successful and failed coups, attempts to gather data on coup plots and rumors require a greater consultation of regional and local-specific sources. == Predictors ==
Predictors
A 2003 review of the academic literature found that the following factors influenced coups: • officers' personal grievances • military organizational grievances • military popularity • military attitudinal cohesiveness • economic decline • domestic political crisis • contagion from other regional coups • external threat • participation in war • collusion with a foreign military power • military's national security doctrine • officers' political culture • noninclusive institutions • colonial legacy • economic development • undiversified exports • officers' class composition • military size • strength of civil society • regime legitimacy and past coups The literature review in a 2016 study includes mentions of ethnic factionalism, supportive foreign governments, leader inexperience, slow growth, commodity price shocks, and poverty. Another 2016 paper finds that government crises, political stability and absence of violence, purges, the level of political terror, general strikes, population growth, legal structure and security of property rights, and the share of democratic countries in the same region, predict the occurrence of a coup. Harkness (2016) finds find that concentration of force in a small number of units near the capital and ethnic or factional imbalance inside the army increase the likelihood of a coup. Several papers suggest that economic crises are associated with regime upheavals. Djuve et al. (2020) report robust evidence that low income, slow or negative growth, predict a higher likelihood of regime breakdown. Moreover, they find that intermediate democracy levels clearly predict coup-induced breakdowns and incumbent-guided transitions. Coups have been found to appear in environments that are heavily influenced by military powers. Multiple of the above factors are connected to military culture and power dynamics. These factors can be divided into multiple categories, with two of these categories being a threat to military interests and support for military interests. If interests go in either direction, the military will find itself either capitalizing off that power or attempting to gain it back. Oftentimes, military spending is an indicator of the likelihood of a coup taking place. Nordvik found that about 75% of coups that took place in many different countries rooted from military spending and oil windfalls. find that the probability of a coup d'état is immediately elevated by acute exogenous shocks (stressors). The stressors include compromised economic growth, deterioration of the external financial position, and elevated levels of generalized and food price inflation. Also, a destabilized political and internal security environment serves as a potent proximal trigger for coup attempts. The study a phenomenon called the coup trap. A 2014 study of 18 Latin American countries found that the establishment of open political competition helps bring countries out of the coup trap and reduces cycles of political instability. A 2025 study challenges earlier findings by showing that coup dynamics can be contagious, but primarily through post-coup trajectories that reshape the abilities and incentives of would-be plotters. Regime type and polarization Hybrid regimes are more vulnerable to coups than very authoritarian states or democratic states. A 2021 study found that democratic regimes were not substantially more likely to experience coups. A 2015 study finds that terrorism is strongly associated with re-shuffling coups. A 2016 study finds that there is an ethnic component to coups: "When leaders attempt to build ethnic armies, or dismantle those created by their predecessors, they provoke violent resistance from military officers." Another 2016 study shows that protests increase the risk of coups, presumably because they ease coordination obstacles among coup plotters and make international actors less likely to punish coup leaders. A third 2016 study finds that coups become more likely in the wake of elections in autocracies when the results reveal electoral weakness for the incumbent autocrat. A fourth 2016 study finds that inequality between social classes increases the likelihood of coups.One study found that coups are more likely to occur in states with small populations, as there are smaller coordination problems for coup-plotters. In autocracies, the frequency of coups seems to be affected by the succession rules in place, with monarchies with a fixed succession rule being much less plagued by instability than less institutionalized autocracies. A 2014 study of 18 Latin American countries in the 20th-century study found the legislative powers of the presidency does not influence coup frequency. A 2024 study found that civilian elites are more likely to be associated with instigating military coups while civilians embedded in social networks are more likely to be associated with consolidating military coups. Territorial disputes, internal conflicts, and armed conflicts A 2017 study found that autocratic leaders whose states were involved in international rivalries over disputed territory were more likely to be overthrown in a coup. The authors of the study provide the following logic for why this is:However, two 2016 studies found that leaders who were involved in militarized confrontations and conflicts were less likely to face a coup. A 2019 study found that states that had recently signed civil war peace agreements were much more likely to experience coups, in particular when those agreements contained provisions that jeopardized the interests of the military. Popular opposition and regional rebellions Research suggests that protests spur coups, as they help elites within the state apparatus to coordinate coups. A 2019 study found that regional rebellions made coups by the military more likely. Economy, development, and resource factors A 2018 study found that "oil price shocks are seen to promote coups in onshore-intensive oil countries, while preventing them in offshore-intensive oil countries". The study argues that states which have onshore oil wealth tend to build up their military to protect the oil, whereas states do not do that for offshore oil wealth. A 2021 study found that oil wealthy nations see a pronounced risk of coup attempts but these coups are unlikely to succeed. On the contrary, a 2014 study of 18 Latin American countries in the 20th century found that coup frequency does not vary with development levels, economic inequality, or the rate of economic growth. It may also involve frequent salary hikes and promotions for members of the military, and the deliberate use of diverse bureaucrats. Research shows that some coup-proofing strategies reduce the risk of coups occurring. However, coup-proofing reduces military effectiveness, and limits the rents that an incumbent can extract. One reason why authoritarian governments tend to have incompetent militaries is that authoritarian regimes fear that their military will stage a coup or allow a domestic uprising to proceed uninterrupted – as a consequence, authoritarian rulers have incentives to place incompetent loyalists in key positions in the military. A 2016 study shows that the implementation of succession rules reduce the occurrence of coup attempts. Succession rules are believed to hamper coordination efforts among coup plotters by assuaging elites who have more to gain by patience than by plotting. A 2017 study finds that countries' coup-proofing strategies are heavily influenced by other countries with similar histories. Coup-proofing is more likely in former French colonies. A 2018 study in the Journal of Peace Research found that leaders who survive coup attempts and respond by purging known and potential rivals are likely to have longer tenures as leaders. A 2019 study in Conflict Management and Peace Science found that personalist dictatorships are more likely to take coup-proofing measures than other authoritarian regimes; the authors argue that this is because "personalists are characterized by weak institutions and narrow support bases, a lack of unifying ideologies and informal links to the ruler". In their 2022 book Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism, political scientists Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way found that political-military fusion, where the ruling party is highly interlinked with the military and created the administrative structures of the military from its inception, is extremely effective at preventing military coups. For example, the People's Liberation Army was created by the Chinese Communist Party during the Chinese Civil War, and never instigated a military coup even after large-scale policy failures (i.e. the Great Leap Forward) or the extreme political instability of the Cultural Revolution. Some scholars have posited that the recruitment of foreign legionnaires into national armies can reduce the probability of military coups. == The mechanics of coups ==
The mechanics of coups
According to Dirsus, coups become possible when enough insiders decide the leader is a liability rather than an asset. Luttwak points out that a coup requires • A reasonably developed, centralized state: A bureaucratic machine with ministries, command hierarchies, and national communications that can be captured and then used as‑is. • Concentrated political power: Power in the hands of a small elite or single party, so that controlling a limited set of institutions essentially is controlling the state. • Limited external interference: Enough autonomy that outside powers cannot simply reverse the coup the next day. • Some underlying social and economic discontent: Unrest makes the existing regime vulnerable and lowers loyalty in key institutions. Luttwak also describes the necessary requirements for a successful coup: • Narrow conspiratorial core: A small group within the military / security / bureaucratic nexus that secretly coordinates. The public and most of the state remain uninvolved. • Control of key nodes, not everything: The aim is to control a few critical nodes (command centres, security headquarters, communications systems, symbolic buildings in the capital), because those nodes give leverage over the rest of the state machinery. • Neutralization of loyalist centres of power: Rather than fighting the entire army, plotters should focus on isolating or paralyzing the parts that might resist: cutting communications, blocking movement, detaining top command if possible. • Manufactured perception of fait accompli: By controlling communication channels (broadcast media, now also digital channels) and visible symbols of authority, the coup group tries to create the perception that it already is the new authority. Most officials and citizens then adapt to what looks like the new reality. Connor and Hebditch (2017) analyze the political, military, and social factors that cause the military to intervene in civilian government. They begin by categorizing coups into breakthrough coups, which are designed to overthrow traditional or colonial systems and initiate a new political order (e.g., Egypt 1952, Cuba 1959), guardian coups , which are aimed at restoring "order" or defending constitutional principles from a failing or corrupt civilian government (e.g., Turkey) , and veto coups, which are launched to block policies or prevent a particular group (e.g., civilian leftists) from gaining power (e.g., Argentina). Usually coups are swift, surgical military operation rather than a drawn-out revolution. It needs to strike when the government is weak, divided, or distracted (e.g., during an economic crisis or political chaos). The recruitment must be extremely covert and to prevent infiltration or preemptive arrests by the existing regime. A coup should target communication hubs (like radio, television, and communication centers), political centers like presidential palaces and parliament buildings, and military bases to secure the means of violence. Propaganda and managing public perception in the execution and consolidation phases are critical. The conspirators should quickly broadcast a clear, motivating message to the public and the uncommitted military, often framing the coup as a necessary step to eliminate corruption, restore national dignity, or save the country from ruin, and to seize state media to control all information flow and create the immediate impression that the coup has already succeeded (fait accompli). Coups usually fail as a result from poor communication, hesitance, or the inability to neutralize the national leader or seize the media quickly enough. Muñoz stresses the role of digitally-coordinated "playbook in orchestrating a coup. This new strategy involves multiple phases across various platforms: A small core group uses encrypted messenger services (like Telegram) for the initial, secret planning and organization of the various phases. They then use major social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter/X, YouTube, etc.) to amplify the narrative and galvanize their users. Less-moderated "alt-tech" platforms (Gettr, Parler, Truth Social) are used to push fringe content and further radicalize followers before finally mobilizing them for the physical, offline action. Using modern technology the plotters take advantage of algorithms designed for virality and engagement to ensure their narratives reach millions of users. They navigate the platforms' inconsistencies to avoid detection and removal for as long as possible, and they catapult content from smaller platforms onto the major ones without being flagged. They can avoid being flagged since they possess a considerable knowledge of content moderation policies. == Outcomes ==
Outcomes
Successful coups are one method of regime change that thwarts the peaceful transition of power. A 2016 study categorizes four possible outcomes to coups in dictatorships: The study found that about half of all coups in dictatorships—both during and after the Cold War—install new autocratic regimes. though coups still mostly perpetuate authoritarianism. Coups that occur during civil wars shorten the war's duration. == Impact ==
Impact
Democracy Since the end of the Cold War, coups have become rarer, and more likely to be followed by democratization. Coups still often simply replace one autocracy with another one (with the new autocratic regime usually more repressive, in an attempt to prevent another coup) or have no effect on regime type. , there was debate about whether coups in autocracies should now be considered to promote democratization, on average, or if countries' chances of democratization are still unchanged or worsened by coups (since democratization can take place without a coup). One reason for the increase in the chance of democratization is that a higher proportion of coups (half of post-Cold-War coups) now take place in democracies (a higher percentage of countries are also now democracies). Democratic countries often rebound from coups quickly, restoring democracy, but coups in a democracy are a sign of poor political health, and increase the risk of future coups and loss of democracy. The dataset is small, so statistical significance varies depending on the model used, ; debate will end if data on more coups makes the pattern clear. According to a 2020 study, "external reactions to coups play important roles in whether coup leaders move toward authoritarianism or democratic governance. When supported by external democratic actors, coup leaders have an incentive to push for elections to retain external support and consolidate domestic legitimacy. When condemned, coup leaders are apt to trend toward authoritarianism to assure their survival. But coup conspirators also increasingly say that they chose a coup to save their country from the autocratic incumbents. Successful conspirators may hold free and fair elections simply because they think it is a good idea. According to a 2019 study, coup attempts lead to a reduction in physical integrity rights. Coups that lead to democratization unsurprisingly reduce repression, and coups that bring in a new autocratic regime increase it. Post-Cold-War, post-coup autocracies seem to have become more repressive and post-coup democracies less repressive; the gap between them is therefore larger than it was during the Cold War. Averaging across democratic and non-democratic outcomes, most coups seem to tend to increase state repression, even coups against autocrats who were already quite repressive. The time interval in which violence is measured matters. The months after a bloodless coup can be bloody. The small sample size and high variability means that this conclusion again does not reach statistical significance, and a firm conclusion cannot be drawn. Notable counter-coups include the Ottoman countercoup of 1909, the 1960 Laotian counter-coup, the Indonesian mass killings of 1965–66, the 1966 Nigerian counter-coup, the 1967 Greek counter-coup, 1971 Sudanese counter-coup, and the coup d'état of December Twelfth in South Korea. A 2017 study finds that the use of state broadcasting by the putschist regime after Mali's 2012 coup did not elevate explicit approval for the regime. International response The international community tends to react adversely to coups by reducing aid and imposing sanctions. A 2015 study finds that "coups against democracies, coups after the Cold War, and coups in states heavily integrated into the international community are all more likely to elicit global reaction." Another 2015 study shows that coups are the strongest predictor for the imposition of democratic sanctions. A third 2015 study finds that Western states react most strongly against coups of possible democratic and human rights abuses. The US has been inconsistent in applying aid sanctions against coups both during the Cold War and post-Cold War periods, a likely consequence of its geopolitical interests. A 2017 study found that negative international responses, especially from powerful actors, have a significant effect in shortening the duration of regimes created in coups. According to a 2020 study, coups increase the cost of borrowing and increase the likelihood of sovereign default. == Current leaders who assumed power via coups ==
Current leaders who assumed power via coups
Leaders are arranged in chronological order by the dates they assumed power, and categorized by the continents their countries are in. Asia Africa == See also ==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com