British Museum skull The crystal skull of the
British Museum first appeared in 1881, in the shop of the Paris antiquarian,
Eugène Boban. Its origin was not stated in his catalogue of the time. He is said to have tried to sell it to Mexico's national museum as an Aztec artifact, but was unsuccessful. Boban later moved his business to New York City, where the skull was sold to
George H. Sisson. It was exhibited at the meeting of the
American Association for the Advancement of Science in New York City in 1887 by
George F. Kunz. It was sold at auction, and bought by
Tiffany and Co., who later sold it at cost to the British Museum in 1897. This skull is very similar to the Mitchell-Hedges skull, although it is less detailed and does not have a movable lower jaw. The British Museum catalogues the skull's
provenance as "probably European, 19th century AD" and describes it as "not an authentic pre-Columbian artefact". It has been established that this skull was made with modern tools, and that it is not authentic.
Mitchell-Hedges skull Perhaps the most famous and enigmatic skull was allegedly discovered in 1924 by Anna Mitchell-Hedges, adopted daughter of British adventurer and popular author
F. A. Mitchell-Hedges. It is the subject of a video
documentary made in 1990,
Crystal Skull of Lubaantun. It was examined and described by Smithsonian researchers as "very nearly a replica of the British Museum skullalmost exactly the same shape, but with more detailed modeling of the eyes and the teeth". Mitchell-Hedges claimed that she found the skull buried under a collapsed altar inside a temple in
Lubaantun, in
British Honduras, now
Belize. As far as can be ascertained, F.A. Mitchell-Hedges himself made no mention of the alleged discovery in any of his writings on Lubaantun. Others present at the time of the excavation recorded neither the skull's discovery nor Anna's presence at the dig. Recent evidence has come to light showing that F.A. Mitchell-Hedges purchased the skull at a
Sotheby's auction in London on 15 October 1943, from London art dealer
Sydney Burney. In December 1943, F. A. Mitchell-Hedges disclosed his purchase of the skull in a letter to his brother, stating plainly that he acquired it from Burney. The skull is made from a block of clear quartz about the size of a small human cranium, measuring some high, long and wide. The lower jaw is detached. In the early 1970s, it came under the temporary care of freelance art restorer Frank Dorland, who claimed, upon inspecting it, that it had been "carved" with total disregard to the natural crystal axis, and without the use of metal tools. Dorland reported being unable to find any tell-tale scratch marks, except for traces of mechanical grinding on the teeth, and he speculated that it was first chiseled into rough form, probably using diamonds, and the finer shaping, grinding and polishing was achieved through the use of sand over a period of 150 to 300 years. He said it could be up to 12,000 years old. Although various claims have been made over the years regarding the skull's physical properties, such as an allegedly constant temperature of 70 °F (21 °C), Dorland reported that there was no difference in properties between it and other natural quartz crystals. While in Dorland's care, the skull came to the attention of writer Richard Garvin, at the time working at an advertising agency where he supervised
Hewlett-Packard's advertising account. Garvin made arrangements for the skull to be examined at Hewlett-Packard's crystal laboratories in Santa Clara, California, where it was subjected to several tests. The labs determined only that it was not a composite as Dorland had supposed, but that it was fashioned from a single crystal of quartz. The laboratory test also established that the lower jaw had been fashioned from the same left-handed growing crystal as the rest of the skull. No investigation was made by Hewlett-Packard as to its method of manufacture or dating. As well as the traces of mechanical grinding on the teeth noted by Dorland, Mayanist archaeologist
Norman Hammond reported that the holes (presumed to be intended for support pegs) showed signs of being made by drilling with metal. Anna Mitchell-Hedges refused subsequent requests to submit the skull for further scientific testing. The earliest published reference to the skull is the July 1936 issue of the British anthropological journal
Man, where it is described as being in the possession of Sydney Burney, a London art dealer who was said to have owned it since 1933, and from whom evidence suggests F.A. Mitchell-Hedges purchased it. He merely claimed that "it is at least 3,600 years old and according to legend it was used by the High Priest of the Maya when he was performing esoteric rites. It is said that when he willed death with the help of the skull, death invariably followed". All subsequent editions of
Danger My Ally omitted mention of the skull entirely. For this reason, the artifact is sometimes referred to as "The Skull of Doom". Anna Mitchell-Hedges toured with the skull from 1967 exhibiting it on a pay-per-view basis. Somewhere between 1988 and 1990 she toured with the skull. She continued to grant interviews about the artifact until her death. In her last eight years, Anna Mitchell-Hedges lived in
Chesterton, Indiana, with Bill Homann, whom she married in 2002. She died on 11 April 2007. Since that time the Mitchell-Hedges Skull has been owned by Homann. He continues to believe in its mystical properties. In November 2007, Homann took the skull to the office of
anthropologist Jane MacLaren Walsh, in the
Smithsonian's
National Museum of Natural History for examination. Walsh carried out a detailed examination of the skull using ultraviolet light, a high-powered
light microscope, and
computerized tomography. Homann took the skull to the museum again in 2008 so it could be filmed for a Smithsonian Networks documentary,
Legend of the Crystal Skull, and on this occasion, Walsh was able to take two sets of silicone molds of surface tool marks for
scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. The SEM micrographs revealed evidence that the crystal had been worked with a high speed, hard metal rotary tool coated with a hard abrasive, such as diamond. Walsh's extensive research on artifacts from Mexico and Central America showed that pre-contact artisans carved stone by abrading the surface with stone or wooden tools, and in later pre-Columbian times, copper tools, in combination with a variety of abrasive sands or pulverized stone. These examinations led Walsh to the conclusion that the skull was probably carved in the 1930s, and was most likely based on the British Museum skull which had been exhibited fairly continuously from 1898.
Paris skull The largest of the three skulls sold by Eugène Boban to Alphonse Pinart (sometimes called the Paris Skull), about high, has a hole drilled vertically through its center. It is part of a collection held at the
Musée du Quai Branly, and was subjected to scientific tests carried out in 2007–08 by France's national
Centre de recherche et de restauration des musées de France (Centre for Research and Restoration of the Museums in France, or C2RMF). After a series of analyses carried out over three months, C2RMF engineers concluded that it was "certainly not pre-Columbian, it shows traces of polishing and abrasion by modern tools". Particle accelerator tests also revealed occluded traces of water that were dated to the 19th century, and the
Quai Branly released a statement that the tests "seem to indicate that it was made late in the 19th century". In 2009 the C2RMF researchers published results of further investigations to establish when the Paris skull had been carved.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis indicated the use of
lapidary machine tools in its carving. The results of a new dating technique known as
quartz hydration dating (QHD) demonstrated that the Paris skull had been carved later than a reference quartz specimen artifact, known to have been cut in 1740. The researchers conclude that the SEM and QHD results combined with the skull's known provenance indicate it was carved in the 18th or 19th century.
Smithsonian Skull The "Smithsonian Skull", Catalogue No. A562841-0 in the collections of the Department of Anthropology,
National Museum of Natural History, was mailed to the
Smithsonian Institution anonymously in 1992, and was claimed to be an
Aztec object by its donor and was purportedly from the collection of
Porfirio Diaz. It is the largest of the skulls, with a weight of and a height of . It was carved using carborundum, a modern abrasive. It has been displayed as a modern fake at the National Museum of Natural History. ==Paranormal claims and spiritual associations==