Writing in
The Guardian, Sam Wollaston argued that the debut of the
Cucumber/
Banana/
Tofu trilogy was the "television event of the week". He said that despite the show being "gloriously, triumphantly, explicitly gay", he "never once felt left out" as a heterosexual viewer.
Mark Lawson said that the show had a wider theme: "the broader genre of respectability meltdown, as Henry is accelerated from smug dullness to scenes featuring police intervention, furious colleagues and social humiliation". Both Lawson and Theo Merz (writing in the
Daily Telegraph) compare the
Cucumber trilogy to Davies'
Queer as Folk—Lawson argues that while
Cucumber and
Banana are "notably sexually graphic", the times have changed: "
Queer as Folk was made at a time when campaigners were fighting to reduce the age of gay sexual consent from 18 to 16, while Davies' latest shows are screening in an era when men and women can legally marry each other", and therefore the depictions of explicit sexual themes are less likely to offend. Writing in the
Telegraph, Gerard O'Donovan argued that the first episode succeeded ("In terms of comedy it worked brilliantly, the brio and louche wit of Davies' writing bringing a rare energy and grit to the unfolding chaos"). But Michael Hogan, also writing in the
Telegraph, said that after watching the third episode, he was "disappointed" and could not find much warmth in the protagonist, Henry. The series was also positively reviewed in
The Independent, where Ellen E. Jones stated: "In Davies' hands, the tragi-comedy of middle-aged desperation is so sad, but so, very, very funny". Jones also argued that the appeal of the show was "universal" rather than just limited to a gay audience. ==International broadcasts==