,
Cobitis taenia '' is a stone loach. Closely related to true loaches, like these, they have barbels. '') is one of the sucking loaches, which are distant from other "loaches". '', a small sucker Historically, these included all the forms now placed in the
superorder Ostariophysi except the catfish, which were placed in the order
Siluriformes. By this definition, the Cypriniformes were
paraphyletic, so recently, the orders
Gonorhynchiformes,
Characiformes (
characins and allies), and
Gymnotiformes (
knifefishes and
electric eels) have been separated out to form their own
monophyletic orders. The
families of Cypriniformes are traditionally divided into two
suborders. Superfamily
Cyprinioidea contains the carps and minnows (
Cyprinidae) and also the mountain carps as the family
Psilorhynchidae.
Catostomoidea is usually treated as a
junior synonym of the Cobitoidei, but it could be split off the Catostomidae and Gyrinocheilidae in a distinct superfamily; the Catostomoidea might be closer relatives of the carps and minnows than of the "true" loaches. While the Cyprinioidea seem more "primitive" than the loach-like forms,'', the earliest known cypriniform • Family †
Jianghanichthyidae Liu, Chang, Wilson & Murray, 2015 (
Paleocene to
Eocene of China) • Suborder
Gyrinocheiloidei Betancur-R,
et al., 2017 • Family
Gyrinocheilidae Gill, 1907 (algae eaters) • Suborder
Catostomoidei Betancur-R, et al., 2017 • Family
Catostomidae Agassiz, 1850 (suckers) • Suborder
Cobitoidei Fitzinger, 1832 • Family
Botiidae Berg, 1940 (pointface loaches) • Family
Vaillantellidae Nalbant &
Bănărescu, 1977 (longfin loaches) • Family
Cobitidae Swainson, 1838 (spined loaches) • Family
Barbuccidae Kottelat, 2012 (scooter loaches) • Family
Gastromyzontidae Fowler, 1905 (hillstream loaches) • Family
Serpenticobitidae Kottelat, 2012 (snake loaches) • Family
Balitoridae Swainson, 1839 (river loaches) • Family
Ellopostomatidae Bohlen &
Šlechtová, 2009 (square-head loaches) • Family
Nemacheilidae Regan, 1911 (brook loaches) • Suborder
Cyprinoidei Fitzinger, 1832 • Family
Paedocyprididae Mayden &
W.J. Chen, 2010 (tiny carps) • Family
Psilorhynchidae Hora, 1926 (mountain carps) • Family
Cyprinidae Rafinesque, 1815 (carps) • Family
Sundadanionidae Mayden & Chen, 2010 (tiny danios) • Family
Danionidae Bleeker, 1863 (danionids) • Family
Leptobarbidae Bleeker, 1864 (cigar barbs) • Family
Xenocyprididae Günther, 1868 (East Asian minnows or sharpbellies) • Family
Tincidae D. S. Jordan, 1878 (tenches) • Family
Acheilognathidae Bleeker, 1863 (bitterlings) • Family
Gobionidae Bleeker, 1863 (freshwater gudgeons) • Family
Tanichthyidae Mayden & Chen, 2010 (mountain minnows) • Family
Leuciscidae Bonaparte, 1835 (minnows)
Phylogeny Phylogeny based on the work of the following works }}
Evolution Cypriniformes include the most primitive of the Ostariophysi in the narrow sense (i.e. excluding the
Gonorynchiformes). This is evidenced not only by physiological details, but also by their great distribution, which indicates they had the longest time to spread. The earliest that Cypriniformes might have diverged from
Characiphysi (
Characiformes and relatives) is thought to be about the
Early Triassic, about 250 million years ago (
mya). However, their divergence probably occurred only with the splitting-up of
Pangaea in the
Jurassic, maybe 160 million years ago (Mya). By 110 Mya, the
plate tectonics evidence indicates that the
Laurasian Cypriniformes must have been distinct from their
Gondwanan relatives. The Cypriniformes are thought to have originated in
South-east Asia, where the most diversity of this group is found today. The alternative hypothesis is that they began in
South America, similar to the other
otophysans. If this were the case, they would have spread to Asia through Africa or North America before the continents split up, for these are purely freshwater fishes. As the Characiformes began to diversify and spread, they may have outcompeted South American basal cypriniforms in Africa, where more advanced cypriniforms survive and coexist with characiforms. Until 2025, no cypriniform fossil remains were known predating the
Cenozoic. In 2025, multiple fossil remains of an indeterminate cypriniform, including jaws, tooth plates, and vertebrae, were identified from the early
Maastrichtian-aged (71–69 Mya)
Prince Creek Formation of Alaska. This occurrence suggests that in contrast to previous hypotheses, cypriniforms may have originated in high-latitude regions and radiated southwards during the Cenozoic. The next-oldest cypriniform fossils are already assignable to the living
family Catostomidae; from the
Paleocene-aged
Paskapoo Formation of
Alberta, they are roughly 60 million years old. During the
Eocene (55–35 Mya), catostomids and cyprinids spread throughout Asia; the earliest members of the cyprinid subfamilies
Barbinae and
Danioninae are known from the Eocene
Sangkarewang Formation of
Indonesia, in addition to possibly
Smilogastrinae and
Labeoninae. The extinct family
Jianghanichthyidae is known from the Eocene of China. In the
Oligocene, around 30 Mya, advanced cyprinids began to outcompete catostomids wherever they were
sympatric, causing a decline of the suckers. Cyprinids reached North America and Europe about the same time, and Africa in the early
Miocene (some 23–20 Mya). The cypriniforms spread to North America through the
Bering land bridge, which formed and disappeared again several times during the many millions of years of cypriniform
evolution. ==Relationship with humans==