Damascus Gate received mostly positive reviews for its suspenseful plot and complex character development. Bill Ott wrote that
Damascus Gate was "the best novel of the year" and "a compelling novel of ideas, securely grounded in the stones of Jerusalem." Sybil Steinberg called the novel "bold and bracing, ambitious and inspired," and wrote that "
Damascus Gate is, even for its flaws, an astonishment."
Kirkus Reviews said that the book's "intensity of its characters’ emotions maintains high interest and irresistibly mounting suspense. Stone’s boldest and, arguably, best novel is ... not to be missed." Some critics viewed
Damascus Gate as a deeply flawed work.
Hillel Halkin said that the book "is really a rip-off of a country and a tradition that deserve better at his hands." Robert S. Frederickson wrote that Stone’s language in this novel "has a cracked and schizoid relation to reality and cannot assuage the sense of existential dread that haunts his world." Jonathan Rosen called the novel "an American religious fantasy." But most critics praised the novel. Michiko Kakutani described the second half of the book as "masterly, thrilling, coiled and somehow both inevitable and surprising." Lawrence Rungren called it a "powerful literary thriller" and "a vivid, multilayered tale of the darkness that too often bedevils humanity's search for the light." John Garvey wrote that "Stone shows how close and at the same time how far apart are the worlds of the nihilist and the genuine believer. And if you feel uncomfortable with the ideas that crop up here, read the book as a great thriller. It works wonderfully at both levels." ==Market impact==