Part of the Croatian media complained about the Croatian Audiovisual Centre (HAVC)'s lack of investment in historical films, in contrast to Film Center Serbia (FCS), and blamed HAVC because a film that "depicts Croats as bad", with
Vjekoslav Luburić being one of its main characters, was going to be distributed worldwide. However, they praised Antonijević and Drakulić, calling them "a quality director and a quality screenwriter", as well as the film production. Due to coordinated rating on
IMDb, either with the highest or the lowest number of stars, IMDb temporarily disabled the rating option for the film in February 2021. Historian
Rory Yeomans argues that the film "isn't
anti-Croat propaganda" but that it is "a serious attempt to portray
fascist oppression", though he agrees that
anti-Catholic bias could be argued. Yeomans disputes the characterizations made by negative reviews and writes that "there is little evidence of a
nationalist agenda" in the film, citing as an example a scene early on where a Croatian woman saves a baby, thus making a distinction between ordinary
Croats from the
Ustashas. He also notes that the film's focus on
Serb women and children is a reflection of the fact that most of the prisoners in
Stara Gradiška were ethnic Serbs. Although some elements of the film were fictionalized and the portrayal of guards is "sometimes-cartoonish", he praises the performances of the actors. Historian
Dubravka Stojanović stated that Antonijević's movie is "historically selective" as "except for one woman and a small group of
Roma, the film does not show that, in addition to Serbs, Roma,
Jews and
anti-fascist Croats were [also] killed
en masse in Jasenovac". According to Stojanović, the film is reminiscent of
Partisan propaganda films which "portrayed only Partisan fighters as victims, and not civilians". She concludes that "the selection of victims is not only a forgery of history, but also a dangerous game with history".
Jovan Byford, author of
Picturing Genocide in the Independent State of Croatia, criticized the instrumentalization of the atrocities in the Jasenovac camp by the state of Serbia in the context of its
geopolitical antagonism with the state of Croatia. The film, according to Byford, often invokes clichés which argue that even the
Nazis were horrified by the brutality of the Ustashas in order to highlight that Jasenovac was "worse than
Auschwitz, and therefore the Serbs have actually suffered a lot more than
Jews".
Porfirije, Serbian Patriarch, stated that the movie should not be a cause for holding grudges and that "everyone can check the stance of their heart and pray to the
Lord that nothing like that ever happens again". He further stated that it is important to speak about Jasenovac. ==Reception==