In 2007, a former employee of Google, Andria Ruben McCool, conceived the idea of using the high resolution imagery from Google Earth to map what was occurring in
Darfur. The project was titled
Crisis in Darfur and is run by the
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in partnership with
Google Earth. The software allows users to zoom in on the region, and users were able to see over 1600 destroyed and damaged villages. Mark Tarn writing in the Guardian describes the images as "dramatic" as the area is marked by red and yellow icons which he says "graphically conveys the mayhem that has been inflicted on the people of the region." In 2004,
Colin Powell told the state committee on foreign affairs that genocide had been carried out in
Darfur, that the Sudanese government and the Janjaweed were responsible, and that the genocide may still be ongoing. Powell stated that having reviewed the evidence which had been compiled by the State Department and having compared it to information that was freely available throughout the international community he came to the conclusion that genocide had been carried out in Darfur. On September 21, 2004, during the Senate Foreign Relations convention, Powell said:"In July, we launched a limited investigation by sending a team to visit the refugee camps in Chad to talk to refugees and displaced persons. The team … were able to interview 1136 of the 2.2 million people the UN estimates have been affected by this horrible situation.""Those interviews indicated: … a consistent and widespread pattern of atrocities: Killings, rapes, burning of villages committed by jingaweit and government forces against non-Arab villagers; three-fourths of those interviewed reported that the Sudanese military forces were involved in the attacks; … [villages] often experienced multiple attacks over a prolonged period before they were destroyed by burning, shelling or bombing, making it impossible for the villagers to return to their villages. This was a coordinated effort, not just random violence." According to
Rebecca Joyce Frey, the international community has taken the same stance with regards to
Darfur as it did with the
Rwandan genocide, that of an "outside observer" or "bystander." Joyce Frey also argues that Bashir, as well as other leaders, have realized that the lack of intervention in Rwanda from the international community gives them free rein to continue the genocide without them having any serious concerns over international intervention.
Nicholas Kristof, writing in
the New York Times, has claimed China "is financing, diplomatically protecting and supplying the arms for the first genocide of the 21st century" in Darfur. China was seen as an enabler for President Bashir's resistance to UN deployment and international attention. China did press Sudan to accept the UN deployments in Darfur; however, China had also supplied Khartoum with weapons and had the power to single-handedly veto resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. China's primary goal is not achieving better human rights practices in the abstract but satisfying Darfur's basic needs for food, shelter, and security. In a 176-page report carried out by the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the United Nations Secretary-General, the Commission determined that the Government of Sudan did not intentionally pursue policies that would lead to genocide. The Commission "found that government forces and militias conducted indiscriminate attacks, including killing of civilians, torture, enforced disappearances, destruction of villages, rape and other forms of sexual violence, pillaging and forced displacement, throughout Darfur." The Commission concluded, however, that "[t]he crucial element of
genocidal intent appears to be missing, at least as far as the central government authorities are concerned." The Commission goes on to say that the war crimes and crimes against humanity that occurred in Darfur are just as important as if the situation were determined to be a genocide. The
Save Darfur Coalition, as David Lanz discusses in his article, "Save Darfur: A Movement and Its Discontents", was one of the biggest international social movements and had significant impacts on how the world reacted to Darfur. Some of the achievements that Lanz attributes to the Save Darfur Coalition, that became extremely popular in the United States, was the change in rhetoric from the government. Lanz attributes Colin Powell's consideration of the Darfur Crisis as a genocide as one of the movement's biggest achievements. One other accomplishment that Save Darfur claims responsibility for was their vital role in lobbying the UN Security Council for their referral of Darfur to the
ICC. In the United States, the Save Darfur movement got the attention of many celebrities, most notably
Angelina Jolie,
Brad Pitt,
George Clooney,
Mia Farrow and
Richard Branson. In 2007, actors Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt made a donation through their Jolie-Pitt Foundation to three agencies—the
UN refugee agency; the
International Rescue Committee, and
SOS Children's Villages—working with displaced people and refugees from Darfur. According to
The Guardian, actor George Clooney has been credited with using his celebrity to help bring the Darfur Crisis onto the world stage. In 2009, both the actress Mia Farrow and the British billionaire Richard Branson also went on hunger strikes in solidarity with the people in Darfur. Farrow has repeatedly travelled to the region, both to the Darfur region as well as to Eastern Chad where many of the refugees from Western Sudan have fled. From 2003 to 2011, Farrow filmed 35 hours of songs, dances, stories, and other elements of Darfuri culture so that it may be preserved; she donated the videos to the University of Connecticut's
Dodd Center for Human Rights in 2011. == Proceedings of the ICC ==