Minerals are needed to provide food, clothing, and housing. A
United States Geological Survey (USGS) study found a significant long-term trend over the 20th century for non-renewable resources such as minerals to supply a greater proportion of the raw material inputs to the non-fuel, non-food sector of the economy; an example is the greater consumption of crushed stone, sand, and gravel used in construction. Large-scale exploitation of minerals began in the Industrial Revolution around 1760 in
England and has grown rapidly ever since. Technological improvements have allowed humans to dig deeper and access lower grades and different types of
ore over that time. Virtually all basic industrial metals (
copper,
iron,
bauxite, etc.), as well as
rare earth minerals, face production output limitations from time to time, because supply involves large up-front investments and is therefore slow to respond to rapid increases in demand. • Copper (2017). Old expectation: Copper (2024). Data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) suggest that it is very unlikely that copper production will peak before 2040. Developments in
hydrometallurgy have transformed non-sulfide zinc deposits (largely ignored until now) into large low cost reserves. Minerals projected by some to enter production decline during the present century: •
Aluminium (2057) Miners have found ways over time to extract deeper and lower grade ores with lower production costs. More than anything else, declining average ore grades are indicative of ongoing technological shifts that have enabled inclusion of more 'complex' processing – in social and environmental terms
as well as economic – and structural changes in the minerals exploration industry and these have been accompanied by significant increases in identified Mineral Reserves.
Peak minerals The concept of peak minerals offers a useful model for representing the changing impacts associated with processing declining resource qualities in the lead up to, and following, peak mineral production in a particular region within a certain time-frame. Peak minerals provides an analytical framework within which the economic, social and environmental trajectories of a particular
mining industry can be explored in relation to the continuing (and often increasing) production of
mineral resources. It focuses consideration on the change in costs and impacts associated with processing easily accessible, lower cost ores before peak production of an individual mine or group of mines for a given mineral. It outlines how the economy might respond as
processing becomes characterised by higher costs as the peak is approached and passed. Issues associated with the concept of peak minerals include: • Average processed ore grades are in global decline for some minerals whilst production is increasing. • Average
discovered ore grades (e.g., in porphyry copper deposits) have remained remarkably steady over the last 150 years. • Structural changes in the minerals exploration industry and the recent focus on "
brownfields" exploration indicate that the debate about how to analytically describe
resource depletion is ongoing. Traditionally, a fixed stock paradigm has been applied, but Tilton and Lagos (2007) suggest using an
opportunity cost paradigm is better because the usable resource quantity is represented by price and the opportunity cost of using the resource. Unlike energy minerals such as coal or oil – or minerals used in a dissipative or
metabolic fashion like
phosphorus – most non-energy minerals and metals are unlikely to run out. Metals are inherently
recyclable and more readily recoverable from end uses where the metal is used in a pure form and not transformed or dissipated; in addition, metal ore is accessible at a range of different grades. So, although metals are not facing exhaustion, they have become more challenging to obtain in the quantities that society demands, and the energy, environmental and social cost of acquiring them could constrain future increases in production and usage.
Cheap and easy in the past; costly and difficult in future Peak production poses a problem for resource rich countries like Australia, which have developed a
comparative advantage in the global resources sector, which may diminish in the future. The costs of mining, once primarily reflected in economic terms, are increasingly being considered in social and environmental terms, although these are yet to meaningfully inform long-term decision-making in the sector. Such consideration is particularly important if the industry is seeking to operate in a
socially,
environmentally and
economically sustainable manner into the next 30–50 years. Whether this situation contributes to Australia's economic wealth or weakens its economic position is contested. While those supporting Australia's reliance on minerals cite the theory of comparative advantage, opponents suggest a reliance on resources leads to issues associated with '
Dutch disease' (a decline in other sectors of the economy associated with natural resource exploitation) and ultimately the hypothesised ‘
resource curse’.
Threats from dependence on the resource sector Contrary to the theory of the comparative advantage, many mineral resource-rich countries are often outperformed by resource-poor countries. This paradox, where natural resource abundance actually has a negative impact on the growth of the national economy is termed the
resource curse. After an initial economic boost, brought on by the booming minerals economy, negative impacts linked to the boom surpass the positive, causing economic activity to fall below the pre-resource windfall level.
Mineral supply and demand The economics of a commodity are generally determined by
supply and demand. Mineral supply and demand will change dramatically as all costs (economic, technological, social and environmental) associated with production, processing and transportation of minerals increases with falling ore grades. These costs will ultimately influence the ability of companies to supply commodities, and the ability of consumers to purchase them. It is likely that social and environmental issues will increasingly drive economic costs associated with supply and demand patterns.
Economic scarcity as a constraint to mineral supply As neither overall stocks nor future markets are known, most economists normally do not consider physical scarcity as a good indicator for the availability of a resource for society.
Demand for minerals While the ability to supply a commodity determines its availability as has been demonstrated, demand for minerals can also influence their availability. How minerals are used, where they are distributed and how, trade barriers, downstream use industries, substitution and recycling can potentially influence the demand for minerals, and ultimately their availability. While economists are cognisant of the role of demand as an availability driver, historically they have not considered factors besides depletion as having a long-term impact on mineral availability.
Future production There are a variety of indicators that show production will become more difficult and more expensive. Key environmental indicators that reflect increasingly expensive production are primarily associated with the decline in average ore grades of many minerals. This has consequences in mineral exploration, for mine depth, the energy intensity of mining, and the increasing quantity of waste rock.
Social context Different social issues must be addressed through time in relation to peak minerals at a national scale, and other issues manifest on the local scale. As global mining companies seek to expand operations to access larger mining areas, competition with farmers for land and for scare water is likely to increase. Negative relationships with near neighbours influence companies' ability to establish and maintain a
social license to operate within the community. Access to identified resources is likely to become harder as questions are asked about the benefit from the regional economic development mining is reputed to bring.
Petroleum == Deforestation ==