Semantically, lexical or semantic affixes often convey more general or abstract meanings than their corresponding free nouns. For instance, an affix meaning “water” in a broad sense may lack a direct noun equivalent, since available nouns typically refer to more specific types such as “saltwater” or “whitewater.” (while in other cases the lexical suffixes have become
grammaticalized to various degrees.) Although they behave as
incorporated noun roots/stems within verbs and as elements of
nouns, they never occur as freestanding nouns. Lexical affixes are relatively rare and are used in
Wakashan,
Salishan, and
Chimakuan languages — the presence of these is an
areal feature of the Pacific Northwest of
North America - where they show little to no resemblance to free nouns with similar meanings. Compare the lexical suffixes and free nouns of
Northern Straits Saanich written in the Saanich orthography and in
Americanist notation: Some linguists have claimed that these lexical suffixes provide only adverbial or adjectival notions to verbs. Other linguists disagree, arguing that they may additionally be syntactic
arguments just as free nouns are and, thus, equating lexical suffixes with incorporated nouns. Gerdts (2003) gives examples of lexical suffixes in the
Halkomelem language (the
word order here is
verb–subject–object): : In sentence (1), the verb "wash" is
šak’ʷətəs where
šak’ʷ- is the root and
-ət and
-əs are inflectional suffixes. The subject "the woman" is
łə słeniʔ and the object "the baby" is
łə qeq. In this sentence, "the baby" is a free noun. (The
niʔ here is an
auxiliary, which can be ignored for explanatory purposes.) In sentence (2), "baby" does not appear as a free noun. Instead it appears as the lexical suffix
-əyəł which is affixed to the verb root
šk’ʷ- (which has changed slightly in pronunciation, but this can also be ignored here). The lexical suffix is neither "the baby" (
definite) nor "a baby" (indefinite); such referential changes are routine with incorporated nouns. ==Orthographic affixes==