In the years since its release,
Desert Fury has been praised as a seminal and unique
Hollywood melodrama due to its bold overtones of
homosexuality. Film scholar
Foster Hirsch wrote: "In a truly subversive move the film jettisons the characters' criminal activities to concentrate on two homosexual couples: the mannish mother who treats her daughter like a lover, and the gangster and his devoted possessive sidekick...
Desert Fury is shot in the lurid, over-saturated colors that would come to define the 1950s melodramas of
Douglas Sirk."
Eddie Muller, writer and founder of the Film Noir Foundation, similarly assessed the film: "
Desert Fury is the gayest movie ever produced in Hollywood's golden era. The film is saturated—with incredibly lush color, fast and furious dialogue dripping with innuendo, double entendres, dark secrets, outraged face-slappings, overwrought Miklos Rosza violins. How has this film escaped revival or cult status? It's Hollywood at its most gloriously berserk." Writing for
Film Comment, Ronald Bergan suggests that it is impossible to discern whether the homosexual undertones in the relationship between Eddie and Johnny were "intended or inadvertent... Since
Vito Russo's 1981 book
The Celluloid Closet, we have grown accustomed to reading cryptic messages of homosexuality in pre-Sixties Hollywood movies. But the Eddie-Johnny relationship is too overt to be intentionally gay in the Hollywood of the Forties. If
Desert Fury had been made in exactly the same way today, however, there would be nothing oblique about the liaison." In one notable piece of dialogue for the period, Paula asks Eddie how he and Johnny met. He replies: "It was in the automat off Times Square, about two o'clock in the morning on a Saturday. I was broke, he had a couple of dollars, we got to talking. He ended up paying for my ham and eggs." "And then?", Paula asks. To which the reply is: "I went home with him that night. We were together from then on." Film scholar
David Ehrenstein cites this dialogue as an example of "the remarkable degree of specificity with which sexual status is detailed" in the film. Film scholar Imogen Sara Smith writes in
In Lonely Places: Film Noir Beyond the City (2014) that the film's flamboyant visuals and undercurrents of homosexuality "tend to mask its real theme, [which is] the weakness and dependency that lurk behind glamorously hard-boiled exteriors... Set in a West thoroughly tainted by crime, money, corruption, and social snobbery, the film is a study of people trying to lasso and bridle the objects of their desire." ==Production==