Synopsis after a painting by
Francis Wheatley. This image was used in the edition of Goldsmith's poem published in 1800 by F. J. du Roveray. The poem opens with a description of a village named Auburn, written in the past tense. :Sweet Auburn! loveliest village of the plain; :Where health and plenty cheered the labouring swain, :Where smiling spring its earliest visit paid, :And parting summer's lingering blooms delayed (lines 1–4). The poem then moves on to describe the village in its current state, reporting that it has been abandoned by its residents with its buildings ruined. :Sunk are thy bowers in shapeless ruin all, :And the long grass o'ertops the mouldering wall; :And trembling, shrinking from the spoiler's hand, :Far, far away thy children leave the land : Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey, :Where wealth accumulates, and men decay (lines 47–52) After nostalgic descriptions of Auburn's parson, schoolmaster and alehouse, Goldsmith makes a direct attack on the usurpation of agricultural land by the wealthy: :... The man of wealth and pride :Takes up a space that many poor supplied; :Space for his lake, his park's extended bounds, :Space for his horses, equipage, and hounds: :The robe that wraps his limbs in silken sloth :Has robbed the neighbouring fields of half their growth (lines 275–300) The poem later condemns the luxury and corruption of the city, and describes the fate of a country girl who moved there: :Where the poor houseless shivering female lies. :She once, perhaps, in village plenty blessed, :Has wept at tales of innocence distressed; :Her modest looks the cottage might adorn, :Sweet as the primrose peeps beneath the thorn: :Now lost to all; her friends, her virtue fled, :Near her betrayer's door she lays her head, :And, pinched with cold, and shrinking from the shower, :With heavy heart deplores that luckless hour, :When idly first, ambitious of the town, :She left her wheel and robes of country brown. (Lines 326–36) Goldsmith then states that the residents of Auburn have not moved to the city, but have emigrated overseas. He describes these foreign lands as follows: :Far different there from all that charmed before :The various terrors of that horrid shore; :Those blazing suns that dart a downward ray, :And fiercely shed intolerable day (lines 345–8) The poem mentions "wild Altama", perhaps a reference to the "
Altamaha River" in
Georgia, an American colony founded by
James Oglethorpe to receive paupers and criminals from Britain. As the poem nears its end, Goldsmith gives a warning, before reporting that even Poetry herself has fled abroad: :Even now the devastation is begun, :And half the business of destruction done; :Even now, methinks, as pondering here I stand, :I see the rural virtues leave the land. :Down where yon anchoring vessel spreads the sail (lines 395–9) The poem ends with the hope that Poetry can help those who have been exiled: :Still let thy voice, prevailing over time, :Redress the rigours of the inclement clime; :Aid slighted truth with thy persuasive strain, :Teach erring man to spurn the rage of gain; :Teach him, that states of native strength possest, :Tho' very poor, may still be very blest; :That trade's proud empire hastes to swift decay, :As ocean sweeps the labour'd mole away; :While self-dependent power can time defy, :As rocks resist the billows and the sky. (Lines 421–30)
Genre, prosody and influences The poem has 430 lines, divided into
heroic couplets. This form features an "AABBCC..." rhyme scheme, with ten-syllable lines written in
iambic pentameter. It is an example of
georgic and
pastoral poetry. The poem is also an example of
Augustan verse. In its use of a balanced account of Auburn in its inhabited and deserted states, and in its employment of an authorly persona within the poem, it conforms to contemporary neoclassical conventions. Goldsmith was educated at
Trinity College, Dublin, and had read Latin poetry since childhood. He would, therefore, have been aware of the criticisms made by classical writers such as
Juvenal and
Pliny of the displacement of the rural poor by the rich. Furthermore, in the eighteenth century the decline of the Roman Empire was attributed to the growth of luxury and pride in Rome. Goldsmith, in emphasising the danger that England faced from its increase in wealth, was drawing an obvious parallel. Ricardo Quintana has argued that the poem takes
Virgil's first
Eclogue as its model. Quintana has also highlighted the way that the poem presents a series of contrasts. In the early parts of the poem, old "Sweet Auburn" and the deserted village are contrasted. Later in the poem, Quintana argues, Goldsmith places nature and art, frugality and luxury, "national vigor and national corruption", and the country and the city, in opposition.
Social commentary The Deserted Village condemns rural depopulation, the
enclosure of common land, the creation of
landscape gardens and the pursuit of excessive wealth. In Goldsmith's vision, wealth does not necessarily bring either prosperity or happiness. Indeed, it can be dangerous to the maintenance of British liberties and displaces traditional community. In making this argument, some have regarded Goldsmith not as a political radical, but as a socially-concerned "conservative". Indeed, his emphasis on the corrupting effects of luxury fit closely with discourses associated with
Tory writers of the time. Sebastian Mitchell has argued that Goldsmith employs "deliberately precise obscurity" in the poem, concealing the reason for the village's demise. While this may detract from the authority of Goldsmith's social critique, it also allows readers to project their own concerns onto the poem. However, Bell also argues that commerce is clearly the "arch-villain of the piece", and it is the riches that a small minority have accumulated from international trade that allow rural people to be displaced from their lands so that country estates can be created. Furthermore, Alfred Lutz has commented that Goldsmith's attacks on landscape gardening have a wider political significance, because enclosure's defenders sometimes compared enclosed fields to gardens. Mitchell also argues that criticism which focuses solely on the poem's historical accuracy misses its wider commentary on late-eighteenth-century social issues, particularly the question of "urban estrangement". == Publication history ==