Device programme Background The Device Forts emerged as a result of changes in English military architecture and foreign policy in the early 16th century. During the late medieval period, the English use of castles as military fortifications had
declined in importance. The introduction of
gunpowder in warfare had initially favoured the defender, but soon traditional stone walls could easily be destroyed by early artillery. The few new castles that were built during this time still incorporated the older features of
gatehouses and
crenellated walls, but intended them more as martial symbols than as practical military defences. Many older castles were simply abandoned or left to fall in disrepair. Although fortifications could still be valuable in times of war, they had played only a limited role during the
Wars of the Roses and, when Henry VII invaded and seized the throne in 1485, he had not needed to besiege any castles or towns during the campaign. Henry rapidly consolidated his rule at home and had few reasons to fear an external invasion from the continent; he invested little in coastal defences over the course of his reign. Modest fortifications existed along the coasts, based around simple blockhouses and towers, primarily in the south-west and along the
Sussex coast, with a few more impressive works in the north of England, but they were very limited in scale. His son,
Henry VIII inherited the throne in 1509 and took a more interventionist approach in European affairs, fighting
one war with France between 1512 and 1514, and then
another between 1522 and 1525, this time allying himself with
Spain and the
Holy Roman Empire. While France and the Empire were in conflict with one another, raids along the English coast might still be common, but a full-scale invasion seemed unlikely. Indeed, traditionally
the Crown had left coastal defences to local lords and communities, only taking a modest role in building and maintaining fortifications. In 1533 Henry broke with
Pope Clement VII in order to annul the long-standing marriage to his wife,
Catherine of Aragon, and remarry. Catherine was the aunt of King
Charles V of Spain, who took the annulment as a personal insult. As a consequence, France and the Empire declared an alliance against Henry in 1538, and the Pope encouraged the two countries to attack England. An invasion of England now appeared certain; that summer Henry made a personal inspection of some of his coastal defences, which had recently been mapped and surveyed: he appeared determined to make substantial, urgent improvements.
Initial phase, 1539–1543 Henry VIII gave instructions through
Parliament in 1539 that new defences were to be built along the coasts of England, beginning a major programme of work that would continue until 1547. The order was known as a "device", which meant a documented plan, instruction or schema, leading to the fortifications later becoming known as the "Device Forts". The initial instructions for the "defence of the realm in time of invasion" concerned building forts along the southern coastline of England, as well as making improvements to the defences of the towns of
Calais and
Guisnes in France, then controlled by Henry's forces. The initial result was the construction of 30 new fortifications of various sizes during 1539. The stone castles of
Deal,
Sandown and
Walmer were constructed to protect
the Downs in east Kent, an anchorage which gave access to
Deal Beach and on which an invasion force of enemy soldiers could easily be landed. These defences, known as the castles of the Downs, were supported by a line of four earthwork forts, known as the
Great Turf Bulwark, the
Little Turf Bulwark, the
Great White Bulwark of Clay and the
Walmer Bulwark, and a long defensive ditch and bank. The route inland through a gap in the Kentish cliffs was guarded by
Sandgate Castle. In many cases temporary bulwarks for
artillery batteries were built in during the initial stages of the work, ahead of the main stonework being completed. The
Thames estuary leading out of London, through which 80 percent of England's exports passed, was protected with a mutually reinforcing network of blockhouses at
Gravesend,
Milton, and
Higham on the south side of the river, and
West Tilbury and
East Tilbury on the opposite bank.
Camber Castle was built to protect the anchorage outside the ports of
Rye and
Winchelsea, defences were built in the port of
Harwich and three earth bulwarks were built around
Dover. Work was also begun on
Calshot Castle in
Fawley and the blockhouses of
East and
West Cowes on the
Isle of Wight to protect
the Solent, which led into the trading port of
Southampton. The
Portland Roads anchorage in
Dorset was protected with new castles at
Portland and
Sandsfoot, and work began on two blockhouses to protect the
Milford Haven Waterway in Pembrokeshire. In 1540 additional work was ordered to defend
Cornwall.
Carrick Roads was an important anchorage at the mouth of the
River Fal and the original plans involved constructing five new fortifications to protect it, although only two castles,
Pendennis and
St Mawes, were actually built, on opposite sides of the estuary. Work began on further fortifications to protect the Solent in 1541, with the construction of
Hurst Castle, overlooking the
Needles Passage, and
Netley Castle just outside Southampton itself. Following a royal visit to the north of England, the coastal fortifications around the town of Hull were upgraded in 1542 with a
castle and two large blockhouses. Further work was carried out in Essex in 1543, with a total of seven fortifications constructed, three in Harwich itself, three protecting the estuary leading to the town, and two protecting the estuary linking into Colchester.
St Andrew's Castle was begun to further protect the Solent. The work was undertaken rapidly, and 24 sites were completed and garrisoned by the end of 1540, with almost all of the rest finished by the end of 1543. By the time they were completed, however, the alliance between Charles and Francis had collapsed and the threat of imminent invasion was over.
Second phase, 1544–1547 Henry moved back onto the offensive in Europe in 1543, allying himself with Spain against France once again. Despite Henry's initial successes around
Boulogne in northern France, King Charles and Francis made peace in 1544, leaving England exposed to an invasion by France, backed by her allies in Scotland. In response Henry issued another device in 1544 to improve the country's defences, particularly along the south coast. Work began on
Southsea Castle in 1544 on Portsea Island to further protect the Solent, and on
Sandown Castle the following year on the neighbouring Isle of Wight.
Brownsea Castle in Dorset was begun in 1545, and
Sharpenrode Bulwark was built opposite Hurst Castle from 1545 onwards. The French invasion emerged in 1545, when Admiral
Claude d'Annebault crossed
the Channel and arrived off the Solent with 200 ships on 19 July. Henry's fleet made a brief sortie, before retreating safely behind the protective fortifications. Annebault landed a force near
Newhaven, during which Camber Castle may have fired on the French fleet, and on 23 July they landed four detachments on the Isle of Wight, including a party that took the site of Sandown Castle, which was still under construction. The French expedition moved further on along the coast on 25 July, bringing an end to the immediate invasion threat. Meanwhile, on 22 July the French had carried out a raid at
Seaford, and Camber Castle may have seen action against the French fleet. A peace treaty was agreed in June 1546, bringing an end to the war. By the time that Henry died the following year, in total the huge sum of £376,000 had been spent on the Device projects.
Architects and engineers Some of the Device Forts were designed and built by teams of English engineers. The master mason John Rogers was brought back from his work in France and worked on the Hull defences, while Sir
Richard Lee, another of the King's engineers from his French campaigns, may have been involved in the construction of Sandown and Southsea; the pair were paid the substantial sums of £30 and £36 a year respectively. Sir Richard Morris, the
Master of Ordnance, and
James Nedeham, the
Surveyor of the King's Works, led on the defences along the Thames. Henry himself took a close interest in the design of the fortifications, sometimes overruling his technical advisers on particular details. Southsea Castle, for example, was described by the courtier Sir
Edmund Knyvet as being "of his Majesty's own device", which typically indicated that the King had taken a personal role in its design. The historian Andrew Saunders suspects that Henry was "probably the leading and unifying influence behind the fortifications". One of these foreign engineers,
Stefan von Haschenperg from
Moravia, worked on Camber, Pendennis, Sandgate and St Mawes, apparently attempting to reproduce Italian designs, although his lack of personal knowledge of such fortifications impacted poorly on the end results. Technical treatises from mainland Europe also influenced the designers of the Device Forts, including
Albrecht Dürer's which described contemporary methods of fortification in Germany, published in 1527 and translated into Latin in 1535, and
Niccolò Machiavelli's , published in 1521, which also described new Italian forms of military defences.
Architecture and
Gravesend blockhouses (top), and
East Tilbury and
West Tilbury blockhouses (bottom) The Device Forts represented a major, radical programme of work; the historian
Marcus Merriman describes it as "one of the largest construction programmes in Britain since the Romans", Brian St John O'Neil as the only "scheme of comprehensive coastal defence ever attempted in England before modern times", while Cathcart King likened it to the
Edwardian castle building programme in North Wales. Although some of the fortifications are titled as castles, historians typically distinguish between the character of the Device Forts and those of the earlier medieval castles. Medieval castles were private dwellings as well as defensive sites, and usually played a role in managing local estates; Henry's forts were organs of the state, placed in key military locations, typically divorced from the surrounding patterns of land ownership or settlements. Some historians such as King have disagreed with this interpretation, highlighting the similarities between the two periods, with the historian
Christopher Duffy terming the Device Forts the "reinforced-castle fortification". The forts were positioned to defend harbours and anchorages, and designed both to focus artillery fire on enemy ships, and to protect the gunnery teams from attack by those vessels. Some, including the major castles, including the castles of the Downs in Kent, were intended to be self-contained and able to defend themselves against attack from the land, while the smaller blockhouses were primarily focused on the maritime threat. Although there were extensive variations between the individual designs, they had common features and were often built in a consistent style. The larger sites, such as Deal or Camber, were typically squat, with low
parapets and massively thick walls to protect against incoming fire. They usually had a central
keep, echoing earlier medieval designs, with curved, concentric bastions spreading out from the centre. The main guns were positioned over multiple tiers to enable them to engage targets at different ranges. There were far more gunports than there were guns held by the individual fortification. The bastion walls were pierced with splayed gun
embrasures, giving the artillery space to traverse and enabling easy
fire control, with overlapping angles of fire. The interiors had sufficient space for gunnery operations, with specially designed vents to remove the
black powder smoke generated by the guns.
Moats often surrounded the sites, to protect against any attack from land, and they were further protected by what the historian
Beric Morley describes as the "defensive paraphernalia developed in the Middle Ages": portcullises, murder holes and reinforced doors. The smaller blockhouses took various forms, including D-shapes, octagonal and square designs. The Thames blockhouses were typically protected on either side by additional earthworks and guns. These new fortifications were the most advanced in England at the time, an improvement over earlier medieval designs, and were effective in terms of concentrating firepower on enemy ships. They contained numerous flaws, however, and were primitive in comparison to their counterparts in mainland Europe. The multiple tiers of guns gave the forts a relatively high profile, exposing them to enemy attack, and the curved surfaces of the hollow bastions were vulnerable to artillery. The concentric bastion design prevented overlapping fields of fire in the event of an attack from the land, and the tiers of guns meant that, as an enemy approached, the number of guns the fort could bring to bear diminished. Some of these issues were addressed during the second Device programme from 1544 onwards. Italian ideas began to be brought in, although the impact of Henry's foreign engineers seems to have been limited, and the designs themselves lagged behind those used in his French territories. The emerging continental approach used angled, "arrow-head" bastions, linked in a line called a , to provide supporting fire against any attacker. Sandown Castle on the Isle of Wight, constructed in 1545, was a hybrid of traditional English and continental ideas, with angular bastions combined with a circular bastion overlooking the sea. Southsea Castle and Sharpenode Fort had similar, angular bastions. Yarmouth Castle, finished by 1547, was the first fortification in England to adopt the new arrow-headed bastion design, which had further advantages over a simple angular bastion. Not all the forts in the second wave of work embraced the Italian approach however, and some, such as Brownsea Castle, retained the existing, updated architectural style. A small blockhouse cost around £500 to build, whereas a medium-sized castle, such as Sandgate, Pendennis or Portland, would come to approximately £5,000. Various officials were appointed to run each of the projects, including a
paymaster, a
comptroller, an overseer and commissioners from the local gentry. A few fortifications were built by local individuals and families; St Catherine's Castle, for example, was reportedly paid for by the town and local gentry, and the Edgcumbe family built Devil's Point Artillery Tower to protect Plymouth Harbour. Much of the expenditure was on the construction teams, called "crews", who built the forts. A skilled worker was paid between 7 and 8 pence a day, a labourer between 5 and 6 pence, with trades including stonemasons, carpenters, carters, lime burners, sawyers, plumbers, scavelmen, dikers and bricklayers. Finding enough workers proved difficult, and in some cases men had to be pressed into service unwillingly.
Labour disputes broke out, with strikes over low pay at Deal in 1539 and at Guisnes in 1541; both were quickly suppressed by royal officials. Large amounts of raw materials were also needed for the work, including stone, timber and lead and many other supplies. Camber, for example, probably required over 500,000 bricks, Sandgate needed 44,000 tiles, while constructing a small blockhouse along the Thames was estimated by contemporaries to require of
chalk just to enable the manufacture of the
lime mortar. Some materials could be sourced locally, but coal was shipped from the north of England and prefabricated items were brought in from London. Most of the money for the first phase of Device works came from Henry's dissolution of the monasteries a few years before, and the revenues that flowed in from the
Court of Augmentations and
First Fruits and Tenths as a result. In addition, the dissolution had released ample supplies of building materials as the monastic buildings were pulled down, and much of this was recycled. Netley Castle, for example, was based on an old abbey and reused many of its stones, East Tilbury Blockhouse reused parts of St Margaret's Chantry, Calshot Castle took the lead from nearby
Beaulieu Abbey, East and West Cowes castles stone from Beaulieu and
Quarr, and Sandwich had the stone from the local
Carmelite friary. Milton Blockhouse was constructed on land that had recently been confiscated from
Milton Chantry. By the second phase of the programme, however, most of the money from the dissolution had been spent, and Henry instead had to borrow funds; government officials noted that at least £100,000 was needed for the work. The garrisons would maintain and care for the buildings and their artillery during the long periods of peacetime and, in a crisis, would be supplemented by additional soldiers and the local militia. The ordinary soldiers would have lived in relatively basic conditions, typically on the ground floor, with the captains of the fortifications occupying more elaborate quarters, often in the upper levels of the keeps. The soldiers ate meat and fish, some of which might have been hunted or caught by the garrison. The garrisons were well organised, and a strict code of discipline was issued in 1539; the historian Peter Harrington suggests that life in the forts would have usually been "tedious" and "isolated". Soldiers were expected to provide handguns at their own expense, and could be fined if they failed to produce them. There were only around 200 gunners across England during the 1540s; they were important military specialists, and the historians Audrey Howes and Martin Foreman observe that "an air of mystery and danger" surrounded them. The rates of pay across the defences were recorded in 1540, showing that the typical pay of the garrisons was 1 or 2 shillings a day for a captain; his deputy, 8 pence; porters, 8 pence; with soldiers and gunners receiving 6 pence each. In total, 2,220 men were recorded as receiving pay that year, at a cost to the Crown of £2,208. Although most garrisons were paid for by the Crown, in some cases the local community also had a role; at Brownsea, the local town was responsible for providing a garrison of 6 men, and at Sandsfoot the village took up the responsibility for supporting the castle garrison, in exchange for an exemption from paying taxes and carrying out militia service.
Armament The artillery guns in the Device forts were the property of the Crown and were centrally managed by the authorities in the
Tower of London. The number of guns varied considerably from site to site; in the late 1540s, heavily armed forts such as Hurst and Calshot held 26 and 36 guns respectively; Portland, however, had only 11 pieces. Some forts had more guns than the level of their regular, peacetime garrison; for example, despite only having an establishment of 13 men, Milton Blockhouse had 30 artillery pieces. A variety of artillery guns were deployed, including heavier weapons, such as
cannons,
culverins and
demi-cannons, and smaller pieces such as
sakers,
minions and
falcons. Some older guns, for example
slings and
bases, were also deployed, but were less effective than newer weapons such as the culverin. The forts were typically equipped with a mixture of
brass and
iron artillery guns. Guns made of brass could fire more quickly—up to eight times an hour—and were safer to use than their iron equivalents, but were expensive and required imported
copper (tin could be sourced from
Cornwall and Devon). In the 1530s Henry had established a new English gun-making industry in the
Weald of Kent and London, staffed by specialists from mainland Europe. This could make cast-iron weapons, but probably initially lacked the capacity to supply all of the artillery required for the Device forts, particularly since Henry also required more guns for his new navy. A technical breakthrough in 1543, however, led to the introduction of
vertical casting and a massive increase in Henry's ability to manufacture iron cannons. Few guns from this period have survived, but during excavations in 1997 an iron
portpiece was discovered on the site of the South Blockhouse in Kingston on Hull. The weapon, now known as "Henry's Gun", is one of only four such guns in the world to have survived and is displayed at the Hull and East Riding Museum.
Longbows were still in military use among English armies in the 1540s, although they later declined quickly in popularity, and these, along with the polearms, would have been used by the local militia when they were called out in a crisis. == Later history ==