Critical response Upon its release,
Digging to China received mediocre reviews from critics. On
Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 33% based on 6 reviews, with an average rating of 4.2/10. In his review in
The New York Times,
Stephen Holden said the film "doesn't grab at the heartstrings and strum an aggressively mawkish ballad. In fact, it could do with a bit more heart. Part of the problem is Ms. Wood's Harriet. The young actress is radiantly photogenic, but her performance is muted and monochromatic ... Without an incandescent performance at its center,
Digging to China follows the same path as Harriet's balloon escape. It gets stuck in the trees." Peter Stack of the
San Francisco Chronicle called it a "cloying, superficial story [that] ends up forced and predictable ... Bacon's portrayal of Ricky, who is disabled by a nerve disease that contorts his body and face, ranges from adequate to almost touching. But it's the desperate, contrived storytelling that makes the film a chore to watch ... [its] saving grace is that it's lush and visually attractive." In the
San Francisco Examiner, Walter Addiego described it as "an uneasy mixture of afterschool special and art-house project" and "well-intentioned but ultimately sentimental" and added, "It nonetheless offers some good performances and nice, low-key observations about the predicament of outsiders ... Considering the material, Hutton should be commended. There's just enough going on in
Digging to China to suggest real directorial talent, and I hope he can build on this foundation." Dennis Harvey of
Variety wrote that the screenplay has "spends so much time anticipating a big goodbye that it seems less touching than simply overdue. [It] doesn't work up much in the realm of character depth, either." He briefly remarked that the actress Cathy Moriarty "gets little to do before exiting the pic, providing scant basis for Harriet's pre-existing domestic unrest, while Seldes' tired, anxious looks can't fill out a similarly underwritten role." He also said that "Masterson's more expansive one travels a short, blunt road from initial irritation to misguided overprotectiveness." Overall, the director called this a film "a pro but uninspired job with the mediocre material. He can't salvage the more poorly conceived scenes … and, despite good production design, the period flavor is too often evoked by leaning on a predictable soundtrack of '60s hits."
Awards and nominations ==See also==