Gender discrimination Gender discrimination is another form of discrimination. Women are often seen as an expense to their employers because they take days off for children, need time off for maternity leave and may be stereotyped as "more emotional". It is known as the
glass escalator or the glass ceiling, which holds that while women are being held down in male-dominated professions, men often rise quickly to positions of authority in certain fields. Men are being pushed forward into management, even surpassing women who have been at the job longer and have more experience in the field in some cases. Discrimination against men has been described in the areas of
family law, such as
divorce and child custody, labor such as
paternity leave,
paternity fraud, health, education,
conscription, and other areas of the
law such as domestic violence, genital integrity, and allegations of rape.
Discrimination against immigrants Immigrants to the United States are affected by a totally separate type of discrimination. Some people feel as though the large numbers of people being allowed into the country are cause for alarm, therefore discriminate against them.
Arizona passed a
law that forces people to carry documents with them at all times to prove their citizenship. Some people claim that immigrants are taking up "Americans" jobs. Immigration restrictions are among the biggest government interventions in the economy. They prevent millions of immigrants from taking jobs, renting homes, and pursuing a wide range of opportunities that they could otherwise have. Violent
hate crimes have increased drastically. Recent social psychological research suggests that this form of prejudice against migrants may be partly explained by some fairly basic cognitive processes. According to Soylu, some argue that immigrants constantly face being discriminated against because of the color of their skin, the sound of their voice, the way they look and their beliefs. Many immigrants are well educated, some argue that they are often blamed and persecuted for the ills in society such as overcrowding of schools, disease and unwanted changes in the host country's culture due to the beliefs of this "unwelcomed" group of people. According to Soylu, there was an open immigration policy up until 1924 in America until the
National Origins Act came into effect. Some argue that the
9/11 terrorist attacks left the country in a state of paranoia and fear that strengthened the views in favor of having closed borders. Worldwide, the workforce has become increasingly pluralistic and ethnically diverse as more and more people migrate across nations. Although race- or ethnicity-based
discriminatory employment practices are prohibited in most developed countries, according to feminist scholar Mary Harcourt, actual discrimination is still widespread. Sahagian Jacqueline, an author, argues that one example of this act of discrimination occurred at
Macy's a department store. According to the U.S. Justice Department, Macy's used unfair documentation practices against legal immigrant employees who had proper work authorizations. During an eligibility re-verification process, Macy's broke immigration law that prohibits employers from discriminating against immigrant employees during re-verification by asking for more or different documents than other employees are required to submit based on a worker's immigration status or national origin. Some of the affected employees lost seniority, were suspended, or even let go due to the illegal re-verification. While their opinions are controversial, researchers Moran, Tyler and Daranee argue that with immigrants' growing numbers and their expanding economic role in U.S. society, addressing challenges and creating opportunities for immigrants to succeed in the labor force are critical prerequisites to improve the economic security for all low-wage working families and ensure the future vitality of our economy.
Discrimination based on sexual orientation Another type of discrimination is that
against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) individuals. For personal reasons such as religious beliefs, employers sometimes choose to not hire LGBTQ+ people. Late in 1979, a
new religious revival among
conservative Evangelical Protestants and
Roman Catholics ushered in the
Republican coalition politically aligned with the
Christian right that would reign in the United States between the years 1970s and 1980s, becoming another obstacle for the progress of the
LGBTQ+ rights movement. LGBTQ+ people and
their rights have been discriminated against for various reasons; for example, one topic of controversy related to LGBTQ+ people is
same-sex marriage, which was
legalized in all the fifty states in June 2015 following the Supreme Court case
Obergefell v. Hodges. On 15 June 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in
Bostock v. Clayton County and two other cases, that workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is covered by Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Changes in Diversity and Equity Policies Revocation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Initiatives: In January 2025, President
Donald Trump signed an executive order canceling DEI programs within the federal government. This decision includes eliminating DEI-related positions in federal agencies within 60 days.
Discrimination in the Education System Ban on Racial Quotas in University Admissions: In June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that considering race as a factor in university admissions is unconstitutional. This decision could lead to the end of affirmative action policies that had been in place at many American universities for 50 years.
Global Concerns About Racial Discrimination Increasing Concerns About Racial Discrimination in the U.S.: A study by the Pew Research Center found that an average of 89% of individuals across 16 non-U.S. countries described racial and ethnic discrimination in the United States as a "somewhat" or "very serious" problem.
Political discrimination Between November 2024–March 2025, the
United States Congress held four separate televised investigative hearings on the federal government's response to, overall recovery efforts from, and criminal events following
Hurricane Helene and
Hurricane Milton during the
2024 Atlantic hurricane season. These hearings heavily focused on actions done by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), including failures in FEMA's response as well as political discrimination and criminal actions by FEMA employees. FEMA came under criticism in early November, when a
whistleblower's report revealed that FEMA supervisor Marn'i Washington instructed team members that it was "best practice" to skip Trump-supporting homes as they canvassed Florida neighborhoods, determining who needed assistance following the hurricane. FEMA workers skipped at least 20 homes in
Lake Placid with Trump signs or flags. FEMA responded by stating it was "deeply disturbed by this employee's actions" and claimed that the agency works to "help all survivors regardless of their political preference or affiliation." Washington was fired for her actions. Following a state investigation of the matter,
Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody filed a discrimination lawsuit on November 14 against FEMA for
conspiring to violate the
civil rights of Florida residents in the response to Hurricanes Helene and Milton. ==See also==