Box office Divine Secrets grossed a domestic total of $69,599,016 and $4,240,224 outside the States, totaling $73,839,240 worldwide. The film opened at #2 the weekend of its release with $16,167,412 behind
The Sum of All Fearss second weekend.
Critical response Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood received a mixed response from film critics. The film holds a 44% "Rotten" rating on the review aggregator
Rotten Tomatoes with the consensus, "
Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood is more melodramatic than emotionally truthful, and uneven in its mixture of time periods, actresses, laughter and tears." Audiences polled by
CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale.
Roger Ebert of the
Chicago Sun-Times gave the film only one-and-a-half out of four stars, writing, "The Ya-Ya Sisterhood is rubber-stamped from the same mold that has produced an inexhaustible supply of fictional Southern belles who drink too much, talk too much, think about themselves too much, try too hard to be the most unforgettable character you've ever met, and are, in general, insufferable." He added, "There is not a character in the movie with a shred of plausibility, not an event that is believable, not a confrontation that is not staged, not a moment that is not false."
Todd McCarthy of
Variety similarly remarked, "While there are pleasures to be had from watching so many grand actresses strut their stuff, the fact is that the overriding preoccupation here rests with surface impressions rather than psychological probity." Michael O'Sullivan of
The Washington Post said, "What is perhaps most disappointing about this ham-handed film, though, particularly since it was directed by the screenwriter of the righteously raging
Thelma and Louise is its crypto-misogyny." Conversely,
Stephen Holden of
The New York Times gave the film a more positive review, describing it as "resolutely for and about women" and observing, "For all its failed connections,
Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood is nurturing, in a gauzy, dithering way."
Kenneth Turan of the
Los Angeles Times also praised the film, saying, "This is a work of excess and passion, an untidy sprawl of a motion picture that is sometimes ragged, occasionally uncertain, but--and this is what's important--always warm, accessible and rich in emotional life." ==References==