The first material that some authors classify as
Doliodus was identified by
Joseph Whiteaves in 1881, and consists of several isolated
fin spines which he identified as a new species in the
genus Ctenacanthus, and which he named
C. latispinosus. This species had no assigned
holotype specimen. In 1889, these spines were suggested to instead belong to the genus
Climatius by paleontologist
Arthur Smith Woodward, who in 1892 also described a single, fragmentary
tooth crown from the same locality (
designated NHMUK PVP.6540) This species, which he named
Diplodus problematicus, was reclassified as the new genus
Doliodus problematicus the following year by paleontologist
Ramsay Traquair based on 19 more complete teeth from the same site. A 2003 paper published in
Nature by Randall Miller and coauthors described a fossilized cartilaginous fish with a well-preserved
dentition,
skull,
fins, and
trunk (designated as
NBMG 10127) and tooth anatomy similar to that described by Woodward and Traquair in
D. problematicus, and these authors assigned this specimen to that species. of
Gaspé, QuebecThe names
Doliodus problematicus and
Climatius latispinosus were used separately prior to the discovery of the articulated specimen, and in that material's description it was suggested further research was required to determine if the taxa were
synonymous. while a 2023 paper by paleontologist Michal Ginter has instead questioned the assignment of any non-tooth material to
Doliodus and restricted it to only the
D. problematicus teeth. The isolated fin spines described by Whiteaves, the teeth described by Woodward and Traquair, and the more complete skeleton all originate from the
Campbellton Formation of
Campbellton, New Brunswick. The site is dated to the
Emsian stage of the
Early Devonian, Additional spines and teeth assigned to the genus has been found in
Gaspé, Quebec, in rocks of the
York River Formation and
Battery Point Formation, which are also dated to the Emsian stage. Michal Ginter includes the Quebecois teeth within the genus. According to Traquair, the genus name is derived from the
Greek root
δόλιος or
dolios, meaning to trick or deceive. The name was given because of how closely the tooth crowns of the genus resemble those of the unrelated
Diplodus. == Description ==