:
Woman Walking Downstairs – 1887 The painting combines elements of both the
Cubist and
Futurist movements. In the composition, Duchamp depicts motion by successive superimposed images, similar to stroboscopic motion photography. Duchamp also recognized the influence of the
chronophotography of
Étienne-Jules Marey and others, particularly
Muybridge's
Woman Walking Downstairs from his 1887 picture series, published as
The Human Figure in Motion. Duchamp submitted the work to appear with the Cubists at the 28th exhibition of the Société des Artistes Indépendants, Paris, 25 March through 16 May 1912. It appeared under the number 1001 of the catalogue, entitled simply ''Nu descendant l'escalier
, not Nu descendant un escalier n° 2''. This catalogue revealed the title of the painting to the general public for the first time, even though the painting itself would be absent from the exhibition. , 1913, the Cubist room, with works by
Raymond Duchamp-Villon,
Albert Gleizes, Marcel Duchamp and
Alexander Archipenko Duchamp's brothers,
Jacques Villon and
Raymond Duchamp-Villon, sent by the hanging committee, asked him to voluntarily withdraw the painting, or paint over the title and rename it something else. According to Duchamp, Cubists such as
Albert Gleizes found that his nude wasn't quite in line with what they had already investigated [tracée]. The hanging committee objected to the work, Duchamp stressed, on the grounds that it had "too much of a literary title", and that "one doesn't paint a nude descending a staircase, that's ridiculous... a nude should be respected". ,
Cheval blanc monté, 1886 It was also believed that the descending nude came too close to the influences of Italian
Futurism. Yet the
Section d'Or Cubists tolerated and even enjoyed the presence of foreign artists (e.g.,
Constantin Brâncuși,
František Kupka,
Alexander Archipenko,
Amedeo Modigliani and
Joseph Csaky). During the month of February 1912, a large Futurist exhibition was held in Paris at the Galerie
Bernheim-Jeune. Duchamp later denied the Futurist influence, claiming that the distance between Paris and Italy was too large for any tenable influences to occur. In an interview with the museum curator Katherine Kuh, Marcel Duchamp spoke about his
Nude Descending a Staircase and its relation to Futurism and the photographic motion studies of Muybridge and Marey: In 1912 ... the idea of describing the movement of a nude coming downstairs while still retaining static visual means to do this, particularly interested me. The fact that I had seen chronophotographs of fencers in action and horse galloping (what we today call stroboscopic photography) gave me the idea for the
Nude. It doesn't mean that I copied these photographs. The Futurists were also interested in somewhat the same idea, though I was never a Futurist. And of course the motion picture with its cinematic techniques was developing then too. The whole idea of movement, of speed, was in the air. Duchamp later recalled of the relation between motion and his nude: My aim was a static representation of movement, a static composition of indications of various positions taken by a form in movement—with no attempt to give cinema effects through painting. The reduction of a head in movement to a bare line seemed to me defensible. And with regard to the petition by the hanging committee of the Indépendants: I said nothing to my brothers. But I went immediately to the show and took my painting home in a taxi. It was really a turning point in my life, I can assure you. I saw that I would not be very much interested in groups after that. Despite the controversy—whether it was seen as such at the time or not—the work was shown with its original title at the ''Salon de la
Section d'Or, Galerie de la Boétie, October 1912, and with the same group of artists that exhibited at the Indépendants. His work also appeared in the illustrations to Du "Cubisme", and he participated in the La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House)'', organized by the designer
André Mare for the
Salon d'Automne of 1912 (a few months after the Indépendants). "The impression is", writes art historian Peter Brooke, "it was precisely because he wished to remain part of the group that he withdrew the painting; and that, far from being ill treated by the group, he was given a rather privileged position, probably through the patronage of Picabia". It has been claimed (by others) that Duchamp never forgave his brothers and former colleagues for censoring his work. Duchamp subsequently submitted the painting to the 1913
Armory Show in New York City, where Americans, accustomed to naturalistic art, were scandalized. The painting, exhibited in the 'Cubist room', was submitted with the title
Nu descendant un escalier, was listed in the catalogue (no. 241) with the French title. A postcard printed for the occasion showed the painting for the first time with the English translation
Nude Descending a Staircase.
Julian Street, an art critic for
The New York Times wrote that the work resembled "an explosion in a shingle factory," and cartoonists satirized the piece. It spawned dozens of parodies in the years that followed. A work entitled
Food Descending a Staircase was exhibited at a show parodying the most outrageous works at the Armory, running concurrently with the show at The Lighthouse School for the Blind. In
American Art News, there were prizes offered to anyone who could find the nude. After attending the
Armory Show and seeing Marcel Duchamp's nude, President Theodore Roosevelt wrote: "Take the picture which for some reason is called 'A Naked Man Going Down Stairs'. There is in my bathroom a really good Navajo rug which, on any proper interpretation of the Cubist theory, is a far more satisfactory and decorative picture. Now, if, for some inscrutable reason, it suited somebody to call this rug a picture of, say, 'A Well-Dressed Man Going Up a Ladder', the name would fit the facts just about as well as in the case of the Cubist picture of the 'Naked Man Going Down Stairs'. From the standpoint of terminology each name would have whatever merit inheres in a rather cheap straining after effect; and from the standpoint of decorative value, of sincerity, and of artistic merit, the Navajo rug is infinitely ahead of the picture." == Provenance ==