Taxonomic history Early treatment (1847–1900) This
type specimen of this species was first collected by
Theodor Hartweg around 1847, in a locality described as the "Rocks near
Carmel Bay,
California." A photograph of the type specimen, as well the description and type locality, indicates that the type was collected from the populations of this species growing on the rocky bluffs of the
Monterey Peninsula. There, the species is well separated from
Dudleya caespitosa, as it grows only on the granitic rocks just above the reach of the waves, while
D. caespitosa is found more landwards and with a different morphology, namely more saturated yellow flowers, narrower, green leaves, and a more slender and less leafier inflorescence. Based on Hartweg's collection,
John Lindley described the species as
Echeveria farinosa. Lindley's description emphasizes the epicuticular wax on the leaves as "if they had been powdered with
flour." He also notes the "remarkable whiteness" of the leaves and the pale lemon flowers as being two characters that clearly delimited the species. Lindley also described
D. caespitosa (as a synonym,
Echeveria laxa) on the same page. In 1864,
Charles Antoine Lemaire modified Lindley's
Echeveria farinosa into
Echeveria farinulenta. This came after the previous edition of ''L'Illustration horticole
erroneously contained the name Echeveria farinosa'' twice, once for Lindley's species, and the second for a plant from
Joseph zu Salm-Reifferscheidt-Dyck. In order to rectify the conflicting names, (see
homonym) Lemaire opted to change the specific name of Lindley's species to
farinulenta. In 1880, this change was reflected by
William Hemsley in
Biologia Centrali-Americana when he created the combination
Cotyledon farinulenta. In 1869,
John Gilbert Baker published a new combination for the species,
Cotyledon farinosa, in
William Wilson Saunders's
Refugium Botanicum, with an accompanying description and illustration. The description was based on plants received by Saunders from the collection of
Belgian horticulturalist
Louis van Houtte. Saunders provided information relating to the horticulture of the plant and regarded the species as "delicate and beautiful."
Modern treatment (1900–present) In 1903, the botanists
Nathaniel Lord Britton and
Joseph Nelson Rose created the new genus
Dudleya, named in honor of
William Russel Dudley, which subsumed most of the
Echeveria and/or
Cotyledon species described in California and the Baja California Peninsula under the new name. In addition, they described 41 new species, recognizing 60 species at the time of publication. They also established the genera
Hasseanthus and
Stylophyllum, which were later subsumed into
Dudleya as well. Based on Lindley and Baker's description, Britton and Rose created the current combination,
Dudleya farinosa. Rose also authored three new species that are currently recognized as heterotypic synonyms of
D. farinosa, all based on specimens collected by
Alice Eastwood from 1900–1903. •
Dudleya compacta Rose – Described from specimens collected in the
San Francisco Bay. Plants with bright green and reddish foliage. Corolla segments acute. •
Dudleya eastwoodiae Rose – Described from specimens collected at
Bodega Point,
Sonoma County. Plants with green or bronzed foliage, sometimes slightly glaucous. Corolla segments obtuse, tube short. Named after Alice Eastwood. •
Dudleya septentrionalis Rose – Described from specimens collected at
Crescent City,
Del Norte County. Plants with waxy white foliage. Corolla segments obtuse, tube very short. Named after its northernmost distribution among the
Dudleya. In 1904, German botanist
Friedrich Karl Georg Fedde, in the botanical yearbook ''Just's Botanischer Jahresbericht
, recombined all Dudleya
back into Cotyledon
, but retained the new species created by Britton and Rose, thus reviving Cotyledon farinosa
but creating Cotyledon compacta
, Cotyledon eastwoodiae
, and Cotyledon septentrionalis''. Britton and Rose's new genus was not quickly accepted. Into the 1920s and 1930s, botanists such as
Willis Lynn Jepson still retained
Cotyledon farinosa, while others still used
Echeveria, like
Alwin Berger. In 1930, Berger, who worked within the
Engler system of plant taxonomy, recombined a number of the new species created by Britton and Rose into
Echeveria, once again reviving
Echeveria farinosa and creating
Echeveria compacta,
Echeveria eastwoodiae, and
Echeveria septentrionalis. In 1953, cytologist Charles H. Uhl and botanist
Reid Moran published the
Cytotaxonomy of Dudleya and Hasseanthus in the
American Journal of Botany. The article was the first comprehensive cytotaxonomic treatment of the
Dudleya. Topotypes of
D. farinosa, and the three species Rose split from it,
D. compacta,
D. eastwoodiae, and
D. septentrionalis, were studied cytologically and all were found to have the chromosome number
n = 17, the basic chromosome number for the genus. All three of Rose's segregate species were treated as synonyms of
D. farinosa.
Modern classification Dudleya farinosa is a member of the genus
Dudleya and is placed within the
subgenus Dudleya. The
basionym (the first published scientific name) is
Echeveria farinosa , and the former segregate species
Dudleya compacta,
Dudleya eastwoodiae, and
Dudleya septentrionalis are recognized as heterotypic synonyms of
Dudleya farinosa by most taxonomic authorities as of 2023. In addition, a number of homotypic synonyms (detailed above) exist as a result of various recombinations of Lindley's name.
Hybridization At the type locality on the Monterey Peninsula, this species is well-separated from its sympatric relative,
Dudleya caespitosa, by morphological features and ploidy, with
D. farinosa a diploid, while
D. caespitosa is a variable polyploid. North of this area, in the
San Francisco Bay, another diploid species,
Dudleya cymosa subsp. cymosa, is found approaching the coast, and in several locations
D. farinosa and
D. cymosa are presumed to hybridize. Further north past central
Humboldt County,
D. farinosa is once again the only diploid species. Although well-separated from
D. caespitosa at the type locality, in the area near
Big Sur, particularly around
Bixby Creek,
D. caespitosa approaches
D. farinosa. In the intermediate stretch of coast between Monterey County and Del Norte County,
D. farinosa also approaches
D. caespitosa in some respects. The two species presumably hybridize. ==Distribution==