The hindlimbs of
Dynatoaetus were robust and much like those of modern eagles, with the
femur in particular being described as extremely large and robust. The
tarsometatarsus follows the same condition, being robust and large. The
metatarsals however are relatively short. Although they too match the other bones in robustness, they are not much different in length from what is observed in female
wedge-tailed eagles. The ungual phalanges of
Dynatoaetus gaffae, the claws of the toes, are again much larger than those of modern wedge-tailed eagles. The wings are also described as being short and robust. The fossil remains indicate that this eagle was the largest bird of prey to have inhabited Australia, over twice the weight of the extant wedge-tailed eagle. It was, however, not as large as a female
Haast's eagle (
Hieraaetus moorei) from the same time of
New Zealand or
Gigantohierax suarezi, a
buteonine from
Cuba. Unlike these two birds of prey, which both likely obtained their massive sizes due to
insular gigantism and a lack of notable competitors,
Dynatoaetus was a continental species like the
Woodward's Eagle (
Amplibuteo woodwardi) from North America. It is therefore believed that its size was at least in part due to its evolutionary history, given that aegypiine vultures are known to regularly obtain large sizes. For instance,
Gyps melitensis from the Pleistocene of Malta as well as the Chinese vultures
Aegypius jinniushanensis and
Torgos sp. were all in a similar size range as
Dynatoaetus gaffae. However, due to their much more derived ecology and the influence this had on their morphology, the precise size difference is difficult to determine.
Dynatoaetus gaffae may have reached a wingspan of up to while
Dynatoaetus pachyosteus was likely comparable in wingspan to the wedge-tailed eagle. Weight estimates were included in the description of the smaller species,
Dynatoaetus pachyosteus, with varying results. Estimates based on humerus length yield a mere , but this is deemed to be an underestimate considering the robust nature of the elements. The least circumference of the humerus meanwhile suggests a more expected weight of , while the least circumference of the femur might even support a weight of up to . However, like with humerus length the weight of the femur is likely to be incorrect, as this element often yields overestimates.
Dynatoaetus gaffae expectedly yielded higher weight estimates than its relatives, with the least circumference of the
tibiotarsus indicating a weight of up to , while the least circumference of the femur, which again likely represents an overestimate, resulted in a weight of up to . Mather and colleagues point out that the large differences among the results is caused by the used algorithms, which are built around a wide variety of vastly different birds. They further highlight that these algorithms generally favour length, not taking into account how weight would be influenced by how robustly built certain birds, like
Dynatoaetus, were. They conclude that
Dynatoaetus gaffae most likely reached a weight of around , whereas
Dynatoaetus pachyosteus would be at least several kilos lighter. ==Phylogeny==