Founded under the name Wildlife Preservation Trust International in 1971 by British
naturalist,
author, and
television personality,
Gerald Durrell, it then became The Wildlife Trust in 1999. In the fall of 2010, the organization changed its name to EcoHealth Alliance. The rebrand reflected a change in the organization's focus, moving solely from a
conservation nonprofit, which focused mainly on the
captive breeding of
endangered species, to an
environmental health organization with its foundation in conservation. The organization held an early professional
conservation medicine meeting in 1996. In 2002, they published an edited volume on the field through
Oxford University Press: Conservation Medicine: Ecological Health in Practice. In February 2008, they published a paper in
Nature entitled "Global trends in emerging infectious diseases" which featured an early rendition of a global disease hotspot map. Using
epidemiological, social, and environmental data from the past 50 years, the map outlined regions of the globe most at risk for emergent disease threats. EcoHealth Alliance's funding came mostly from U.S. federal agencies such as the
Department of Defense,
Department of Homeland Security, and
U.S. Agency for International Development. Between 2011 and 2020, its annual budget fluctuated between US$9 and US$15 million per year.
COVID-19 pandemic Following the outbreak of the
COVID-19 pandemic, EcoHealth Alliance was the subject of controversy and increased scrutiny due to its ties to the
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)—which has been at the center of speculation since early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 may have escaped in a lab incident. Prior to the pandemic, EcoHealth Alliance was the only U.S.-based organization researching
coronavirus evolution and transmission in China, where they partnered with the WIV, among others. EcoHealth Alliance president
Peter Daszak co-authored
a February 2020 letter in
The Lancet condemning "
conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin". However, Daszak failed to disclose EcoHealth Alliance's ties to the WIV, which some observers noted as an apparent
conflict of interest. In June 2021,
The Lancet published an addendum in which Daszak disclosed his cooperation with researchers in China. In April 2020, the
NIH ordered EcoHealth Alliance to cease spending the remaining $369,819 from its current NIH grant at the request of the
Trump administration, pressuring them by stating "it must hand over information and materials from the Chinese research facility to resume funding for suspended grant" in reference to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The canceled grant was supposed to run through 2024. Funding from NIH resumed in August 2020 after an uproar from "77 U.S. Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies". NIH officials (including
Anthony Fauci) unequivocally denied during 2020
congressional hearings that the EcoHealth Alliance had conducted GoF research with NIH funding. In October 2021, the EcoHealth Alliance submitted a progress report detailing the results of a past experiment where some
laboratory mice lost more weight than expected after being infected with a modified bat coronavirus. The NIH subsequently sent a letter to the congressional
House Committee on Energy and Commerce describing this experiment, but did not refer to it as "gain-of-function." In May 2024, the
United States Department of Health and Human Services banned all federal funding for the EcoHealth Alliance, saying that the EcoHealth Alliance did not properly monitor research activities at the WIV and failed to report on their high-risk experiments. ==Programs==