• On 9 January 2005,
The New York Times journalists
Don van Natta and
Souad Mekhennet broke the story about the El-Masri case after months of research. • Van Natta and Mekhennet also worked on follow-up stories about the involvement of German and Macedonian authorities. Mekhennet later travelled to Algeria and other countries and interviewed prisoners who had been held with El-Masri. • A 9 November 2005
Reuters story stated that a German prosecutor is investigating El-Masri's kidnapping "by persons unknown", and that another lawyer,
Manfred Gnjidic, would be flying to the U.S. to file a civil compensation suit. It noted that US authorities neither confirmed nor denied any element of El-Masri's story. • According to a 4 December 2005 article in
The Washington Post, the CIA's
Inspector General was investigating a series of "
erroneous renditions", including El-Masri's. • On 6 December 2005, the
American Civil Liberties Union helped El-Masri file suit in the US against former CIA director
George Tenet and the owners of the private jets, leased to the US government, that the CIA used to transport him. El-Masri had to participate via a video link because the American authorities had denied him entry when his plane landed in the United States. Some press reports attributed the Americans barring him entry due to his name remaining on the watch list and being confused with Khalid al-Masri. But his lawyer, Manfred Gnjidic, was also barred entry. • In December 2005, El-Masri published a first-person account of his experience in the
Los Angeles Times. •
Time magazine reported on 2 March 2006 that El-Masri may have been a leader of a radical, Lebanese
Sunni islamist group ideologically affiliated with the
Muslim brotherhood called "el-Tawhid" in the early 1980s, which fought
Alawites in
Tripoli during the
Lebanese Civil War. German reports assert that El-Masri reported being a member of
El-Tawhid (also spelled
Al-Tawhid when he applied to Germany for refugee status, in 1985. • On 18 May 2006, U.S. Federal District Judge
T.S. Ellis, III dismissed a lawsuit El-Masri filed against the CIA and three private companies allegedly involved with his transport, based on the government's position that it would "present a grave risk of injury to national security." (This legal doctrine is known as the
state secrets privilege. Ellis said that if Masri's allegations were true, he deserved compensation from the US government.) • The
BND (German intelligence agency) declared on 1 June 2006 that it had known of El-Masri's seizure 16 months before the German government was officially informed in May 2004 of his mistaken arrest. Germany had previously claimed that it did not know of El-Masri's abduction until his return to the country in May 2004. • On 26 July 2006, the ACLU announced that "it will appeal the recent dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Khaled El-Masri against the US government." According to the ACLU attorney
Ben Wizner, "If this decision stands, the government will have a blank check to shield even its most shameful conduct from accountability." • On 4 October 2006,
The Washington Post reported that Munich prosecutors were complaining that a lack of cooperation from US authorities was impeding their investigation into El-Masri's abduction. The article reported that Munich prosecutors have a list of the names, or known aliases, of 20 CIA operatives who they believe played a role in the abduction. • On 31 January 2007, Munich Prosecutor Christian Schmidt-Sommerfeld announced that warrants for 13 people were issued for suspected involvement in El-Masri's rendition. • According to a
leaked US cable, on February 6, 2007, U.S. officials warned the German government not to issue international warrants, saying such action could adversely affect relations between the two countries. • On 21 February 2007, the German Government decided to pass the warrants to
Interpol. • On 2 March 2007, the
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of
El-Masri v. Tenet. • On 30 April 2007, the
Federal Constitutional Court of Germany ruled as unconstitutional the
tapping of the phones of El-Masri's lawyer by Munich's DA office. The DA had requested the tapping, claiming they expected the CIA to contact the lawyer "to find a solution to the case". • In June 2007, the ACLU filed a petition for
certiorari at the
U.S. Supreme Court to have El-Masri's suit heard. • On 12 July 2007, the
European Parliament issued the
2006 Progress Report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, in which the authorities of Macedonia were urged to cooperate in the investigation of the abduction. • In July 2007, the CIA prepared an internal report examining the CIA's handling of El-Masri, stating "The report notes that all agency attorneys interviewed agreed that Masri did not meet the legal standard for rendition and detention, which required that a suspect be deemed a threat." • In September 2007, the German Government decided not to ask the US officially for extradition of CIA personnel associated with El-Masri's abduction, as an unofficial request had been denied. • On 5 September 2007, the
Constitution Project filed an
amicus curiae, a legal brief in support of El-Masri's petition for certiorari. • On 9 October 2007, the ACLU petition was declined for hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court, without comment. • On 10 June 2008, German and US civil rights lawyers representing El-Masri filed a new civil suit, seeking to force the German government to reconsider the extradition requests it issued in January 2007. • In May 2009, prosecutors attached to the
Spanish National Court asked for an arrest order for thirteen CIA agents involved in the kidnapping. • On 4 March 2010, in a written statement, former Macedonian Interior Minister
Hari Kostov confirmed that El-Masri was arrested by the Macedonian security authorities, held in Skopje without contact to the outside world under the supervision of intelligence officials, and was later handed over to a CIA team. • In May 2012, the European Court of Human Rights held a hearing on the case between El-Masri and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (application number 39630/09)), in which he had filed for damages for suffering due to treatment in Macedonian custody and for being handed over to the CIA. • On 13 December 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled that El-Masri's account was established beyond a reasonable doubt, and that "Macedonia was "responsible for his torture and ill-treatment" both in the country and after turning him over to US authorities." • In June 2016, a redacted version of the July 2007 internal CIA report was obtained by the ACLU under the FOIA. • In a letter dated on 28 March 2018 Macedonia's Minister of Foreign Affairs
Nikola Dimitrov expressed his “sincere apologies and unreserved regrets” for what he described as the “improper conduct of our authorities” in 2004. ==Other legal troubles==