Elachistosuchus was originally thought to be a
pseudosuchian archosaur by Janensch (1949). Janensch diagnosed it among other pseudosuchians by its small body size, the lack of a specialized body plan, the presence of a large post-
temporal fenestra, and what he believed to be an ant
orbital fenestra. Walker (1966) reinterpreted
Elachistosuchus as a
rhynchocephalian closely related to the only living genus
Sphenodon (the
tuatara) based on the long front portion of the
jugal bone, the allegedly
acrodont dentition, the large posttemporal fenestra, the absence of an external
lower jaw fenestra, and a strongly twisted end of the
humerus. Walker (1966) also argued that the antorbital fenestra identified by Janensch actually represented a damaged opening for the
lacrimal canal. Due to the small size and fragility of the holotype, further mechanical preparation is not possible, which caused
Elachistosuchus to be largely ignored in the scientific literature. More recently however, a non-invasive μCT scanning allowed for the examination of MB.R. 4520 and assessment of much of its internal
cranial structure. Additionally, the scan revealed previously unknown parts of the skeleton concealed in the matrix, specifically the
braincase,
palate, and parts of the shoulder girdle. Sobral, Sues and Müller (2015) provided a revised diagnosis for the species, based on these new observations.
Elachistosuchus was considered by them to represent a small diapsid reptile, probably a
basal archosauromorph (based on the results of several
phylogenetic analyses), with a distinct back-side portion of the
frontal bone,
maxillary tooth row that extends behind the back margin of
eye socket, a
jugal bone with free back process, a palatine ramus of the
pterygoid bone with
shagreen of teeth, an
angular bone exposed along about one third of the side surface of
mandibular ramus, dichocephalous chest ribs, a notched front margin of the
interclavicle, and a spoon-shaped back projection of the interclavicle. ==Phylogeny==