Taxonomic history Vertebrata 1847 illustration of the archetypal vertebrate skeleton In 1801,
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck defined the vertebrates as a taxonomic group, but treated the
cephalochordates and
tunicates as
molluscs. In 1806,
André Marie Constant Duméril grouped hagfishes and lampreys in the taxon Cyclostomi, characterized by horny teeth borne on a tongue-like apparatus, a large notochord as adults, and pouch-shaped gills (Marsupibranchii). The cyclostomes were seen as either degenerate cartilaginous fishes or primitive vertebrates. In 1889,
Edward Drinker Cope coined the name
Agnatha ("jawless") for a group that included the cyclostomes and fossil groups in which jaws could not be observed. In 2010, the debate concluded when the French paleontologist
Philippe Janvier stated that he accepted that both vertebrates and cyclostomes were monophyletic, and that "the intuitions of 19th century zoologists were correct in assuming that [cyclostomes] (notably, hagfishes) are strongly degenerate and have lost many characters over time."
Traditional taxonomy of various groups of vertebrates through the
geologic ages. The width of the bubbles signifies the number of
families. Conventional
evolutionary taxonomy groups
extant vertebrates into seven classes based on traditional interpretations of gross
anatomical and
physiological traits. The commonly held classification lists three classes of fish and four of
tetrapods. This ignores some of the natural relationships between the groupings. For example, the birds derive from a group of reptiles, so "
Reptilia" excluding
Aves is not
a natural grouping; it is described as
paraphyletic and shown in quotation marks. •
Subphylum Vertebrata • Class "
Agnatha" (jawless fishes) • Class
Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) • Class "
Osteichthyes" (bony fishes) • Class "
Amphibia" (traditional amphibians) • Class "
Reptilia" (reptiles) • Class
Aves (birds) • Class
Mammalia (mammals) In addition to these, there are two classes of extinct armoured fishes,
Placodermi and
Acanthodii. Other ways of classifying the vertebrates have been devised, particularly with emphasis on the
phylogeny of
early amphibians and reptiles. An example based on work by M.J. Benton in 2004 is given here († =
extinct, "" = paraphyletic): •
Subphylum Vertebrata •
Infraphylum "Agnatha" (
lampreys and other jawless fishes) •
Superclass Anaspidomorphi (anaspids and relatives) • Class
Anaspida (anaspids) •
Superclass Cyclostomata (cyclostomes) • Class
Myxini (hagfish) • Class
Petromyzontida (lampreys) • Class
Cephalaspidomorphi (cephalaspidomorphs) • Class
Conodonta (conodonts) • Class
Pteraspidomorpha (pteraspidomorphs) • Class
Thelodonti (thelodonts) •
Infraphylum Gnathostomata (vertebrates with jaws) • Class "
Placodermi" (armoured fishes) • Class
Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) • Class "
Acanthodii" (spiny 'sharks') •
"Osteichthyes" (bony fishes) • Class
Actinopterygii (ray-finned bony fishes) • "
Sarcopterygii" (lobe-finned fishes,
cladistically including the
tetrapods) •
Superclass Tetrapoda (four-limbed vertebrates) • Class "
Amphibia" (amphibians,
Lissamphibia) • Class
Synapsida (
mammals and their extinct relatives) • Class
Sauropsida (modern reptiles and
birds) •
Incertae sedis • Genus
Nuucichthys • Genus
Palaeospondylus While this traditional taxonomy is orderly, most of the groups are paraphyletic, meaning that the structure does not accurately reflect the natural evolved grouping.
External phylogeny The closest relatives of vertebrates have been debated over the years. It was once thought that the
Cephalochordata was the
sister taxon to Vertebrata. This group, Notochordata, was taken to be sister to the
Tunicata. Since 2006, analysis has shown that the tunicates + vertebrates form a clade, the Olfactores, with Cephalochordata as its sister (the
Olfactores hypothesis), as shown in the following
phylogenetic tree. }} The placement of hagfishes within the vertebrates has been controversial. Their lack of proper vertebrae (among other characteristics of jawless lampreys and jawed vertebrates) led authors of phylogenetic analyses based on
morphology to place them outside Vertebrata.
Molecular data however indicates that they are vertebrates, being most closely related to lampreys. An older view is that they are a sister group of vertebrates in the common taxon of Craniata. In 2019, Tetsuto Miyashita and colleagues reconciled the two types of analysis, supporting the
Cyclostomata hypothesis using only morphological data. A wider issue is the position of fossil agnathans, such as the Myllokunmingiida. Tetsuto Miyashita and colleagues in 2019 place them tentatively as part of the Vertebrata total group, outside the Vertebrata crown group that led to all extant vertebrates. These fossils have a cranium (a skull of bone or cartilage) but at most a rudimentary vertebral column, so they can be viewed as part of a craniate clade that also includes the crown group vertebrates which possess a full vertebral column. }} ::: $ Equivalent to Craniata. == Diversity ==