Ideologies, fields, and concepts in environmental social science aim to convey how environmental issues are intertwined with societal relations, institutions, and human activities that continually shape the environment or are themselves shaped by it. For example,
political ecology is based on the premise that the environment is not apolitical. Therefore, how it is managed, who has access to the environment, and how environmental resources are distributed are shaped by political structures, power relations, economic institutions, and social processes. Human-environmental relations reverberate through "the system" (politics, economics, power relations) moving through an entire web of human relations and structures that are intertwined in ecological relations. Therefore, environmental social scientists stress human–environmental relationships. Another idea that has risen to prominence in environmental social science in light of this, is the idea of "
environmental justice" which connects issues in the field of social justice with issues related to the environment. In describing environmental justice, the concepts emphasized by Shoreman-Ouimet and Kopnina include "equity equality, and rights issues in relation to both social and ecological actors". This pans out in debates about environmental vulnerability and the unequal distribution of resources. Here lies the idea that certain groups are made more vulnerable to "environmental burdens" Ideas related to exploring human and animal interactions within the natural world have become prominent in
environmental ethics. Shoreman-Ouimet and Kopnina define environment ethics as "a sub-discipline of philosophy that deals with the ethical problems surrounding the environment, in some cases providing ethical justification and moral motivation for the cause of environmental protection or for considerations of animal welfare". Domesticity refers to societal dynamics produced in societies in which humans have daily contact with animals other than pets. In contrast, in post-domesticity, people are quite distant from the animals they consume. In reference to Bulliet (2005), Emel and Neo convey that the distance from witnessing the processes that govern animal life, including births and deaths, while consuming animals as food, affects people differently than continuous interaction with animals. They mention that post-domesticity may produce feelings of guilt however the continued distance between animal life brought by interacting with animals as a commodity may cause people to only distantly relate to them or think of them as packages in a store disassociating them from the life-cycles they embody. Therefore, environmental science has paved the way to multiple concepts, ideas and paradigms that differ among each other. Still, all seek to intertwine environmental issues with other fields and issues in the social sciences. == Social epidemiology ==