Selective enforcement and double standards on rule of law The European People's Party has faced substantial criticism for displaying a double standard in its enforcement of democratic values and rule of law principles. While the party has positioned itself as a guardian of European democratic standards, critics argue that it has been significantly more lenient toward violations committed by its own member parties compared to violations by non-EPP members.
GERB Bulgaria One of the most prominent examples of the EPP's selective accountability involves
GERB in
Bulgaria. Despite Bulgaria being consistently ranked as the most corrupt European Union member state according to international indices, the EPP offered consistent protection and support to Bulgarian Prime Minister
Boyko Borissov and his GERB party for over a decade. In 2020-2021, when
Bulgarian citizens protested for more than 100 consecutive days demanding Borissov's resignation over corruption and poor governance, the EPP actively opposed efforts to hold the government accountable. During the October 2020 European Parliament debate on a resolution condemning democratic backsliding and corruption under GERB's rule, the EPP made "huge efforts to amend the draft resolution by replacing its critical texts with praise for Borissov's sister party GERB." EPP President
Roberta Metsola introduced multiple amendments to weaken the resolution, though it ultimately passed with 358 votes in favor despite EPP opposition. Prominent EPP figures actively defended Borissov despite accumulating evidence of systemic corruption.
Manfred Weber, the EPP Group's leader in the European Parliament, released statements saying he "fully supported Borissov and his government's fight against corruption" even as corruption scandals multiplied. German Chancellor
Angela Merkel, head of the CDU, met with Borissov and expressed support for his government without raising substantial concerns about corruption allegations.
Hungary and delayed action against Orbán The EPP faced criticism for its delayed response to systematic dismantling of democratic institutions in
Hungary by the
Fidesz party under Viktor Orbán. Despite extensive documentation by international organizations of serious rule-of-law violations beginning immediately after Fidesz's 2010 election victory, the EPP did not suspend Fidesz until March 20, 2019—a nine-year delay. In January 2012, the European Commission launched accelerated infringement proceedings against Hungary, concluding that new legislation "conflicts with EU law" by undermining "the independence of the country's central bank and data protection authorities and by the measures affecting its judiciary." The
Venice Commission, the Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional matters, found in its February 2012 mission report that "in none of the member states of the Council of Europe have such important powers been vested in a single person, lacking sufficient democratic accountability." It concluded that "the reform as a whole threatens the independence of the judiciary."
Human Rights Watch documented in 2013 that the Fidesz government had "curbed the independence of the judiciary and the administration of justice, forced nearly 300 judges into early retirement, and imposed limitations on the Constitutional Court's ability to review laws and complaints." The
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) characterized Hungary's 2018 elections as "free but not fair," citing "media bias and opaque campaign financing" and noting that "the line between state and party" was blurred through "abuse of administrative resources." By 2022, the EU classified Hungary as an "electoral autocracy" rather than a democracy, stating that "representative democratic values have been completely undermined." The 2019 suspension of Fidesz came primarily after Orbán's government launched personal attacks against Jean-Claude Juncker and Manfred Weber rather than in response to the nine-year pattern of violations documented by international organizations. When the suspension occurred, Fidesz remained in the EPP Group in the European Parliament and was merely excluded from party meetings. Fidesz ultimately left the EPP in March 2021 after the party established new suspension and expulsion procedures.
Double standards on member states The EPP's inconsistent application of rule-of-law standards became increasingly apparent through parliamentary debates. French MEP
Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield raised the issue directly, questioning: "Is this (European) Parliament suffering from high sensitivity to rule of law issues only when it's about countries that are not governed by EPP?" While the EPP initiated numerous resolutions on rule-of-law violations in Malta, critics noted it rarely initiated similar scrutiny regarding comparable concerns about corruption and institutional weakness in Greece and Bulgaria, which were governed by EPP member parties (New Democracy and GERB respectively). Dutch MEP
Sophia 't Veld similarly noted: "It is true that we are talking, here, about Malta today, because the EPP did not want to have a debate on Greece… there is a systematic problem with the rule of law in Greece." When rule-of-law violations occurred in countries governed by EPP members, the party's response was notably muted. Greece, governed by EPP member New Democracy, faced allegations of illegal surveillance of opposition figures and journalists under Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, yet the EPP's public response was notably absent.
Serbian Progressive Party and Vučić The EPP has been accused of "complicit silence" regarding Aleksandar Vučić's
Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), which holds associate membership status in the EPP as Serbia is an EU candidate country. Despite documented police violence against protesters, media crackdowns, and authoritarian governance patterns, the EPP offered minimal public criticism for years. In 2025, following nine months of anti-government protests in Serbia, the EPP only initiated a "scrutiny process" regarding SNS membership. Critics argued this response was insufficient and delayed given the documented violence and repression. The Socialists and Democrats called on the EPP to "stop appeasing Vučić" and apply the same approach as to Georgia, urging a freeze on EU accession negotiations pending democratic reforms. The EPP's reluctance to confront democratic deterioration in Serbia has been attributed to strategic interests in maintaining influence in the Western Balkans. A 2023 study noted that "the EPP was interested in maintaining influence in the Western Balkans while avoiding alienation of the SNS. This approach took precedence over particular national interests, domestic electoral incentives, or ideological beliefs." == Activities beyond the European Union ==