Caucasus as the origin of humanity and the peak of beauty In the eighteenth century, the prevalent view among European scholars was that the
human species had its origin in the region of the
Caucasus Mountains. This view was based upon the Caucasus being the location for the
purported landing point of Noah's Ark – from whom the Bible states that
humanity is descended – and the location for the suffering of
Prometheus, who in
Hesiod's myth had crafted humankind from clay. In addition, the
most beautiful humans were reputed by Europeans to be the stereotypical "
Circassian beauties" and the
Georgians; both
Georgia and
Circassia are in the
Caucasus region. The "Circassian beauty" stereotype had its roots in the Middle Ages, while the reputation for the attractiveness of the Georgian people was developed by early modern travellers to the region such as
Jean Chardin.
Göttingen school of history ' 1785 treatise
The Outline of History of Mankind was the first work to use the term
Caucasian (
Kaukasisch) in its wider racial sense. (Click on image for English translation of the text) The term
Caucasian as a racial category was introduced in the 1780s by members of the
Göttingen school of history – notably
Christoph Meiners in 1785 and
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach in 1795. It had originally referred in a narrow sense to the
native inhabitants of the Caucasus region. In his
The Outline of History of Mankind (1785), the German philosopher Christoph Meiners first used the concept of a "Caucasian" (
Kaukasisch) race in its wider racial sense. As a supporter of the
polygenist theory of human origins, he subscribed to a "
binary [greater] racial scheme" of superior Caucasians and inferior
Mongoloids in which he did not include
Jews as Caucasians and to whom he ascribed a "
permanently degenerate nature". Using a "bundle of notions" led to creations of purported subraces on a continental and state basis with implied decreased respective scientific weight. Meiners' term was given wider circulation in the 1790s by many people. Other members of the Göttingen school of history would make the addition of
Negroids. female by Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, used as an archetype for the Caucasian racial characteristics in his 1795
De Generis Humani Varietate It was Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a colleague of Meiners', who later came to be considered one of the founders of the discipline of
anthropology, who gave the term a wider audience, by grounding it in the new methods of
craniometry and
Linnean taxonomy. Blumenbach did not credit Meiners with his taxonomy, although his justification clearly points to Meiners' aesthetic viewpoint of Caucasus origins. In contrast to Meiners, however, Blumenbach was a monogenist—he considered all humans to have a shared origin and to be a single species. Blumenbach, like Meiners, did rank his Caucasian grouping higher than other groups in terms of mental faculties or potential for achievement Alongside the anthropologist
Georges Cuvier, Blumenbach classified the Caucasian race by cranial measurements and bone morphology in addition to skin pigmentation. He ultimately imagined that the Caucasian race encompassed all of the ancient and most of the modern native populations of Europe, the aboriginal inhabitants of West Asia (including the Phoenicians, Hebrews and Arabs), the
autochthones of Northern Africa (Berbers, Egyptians, Abyssinians and neighboring groups), the Indians, and the ancient
Guanches. This usage later grew into the widely used
color terminology for race, contrasting with the terms
Negroid,
Mongoloid, and
Australoid.
Carleton Coon There was never consensus among the proponents of the "Caucasoid race" concept regarding how it would be delineated from other groups such as the proposed
Mongoloid race.
Carleton S. Coon (1939) included the populations native to all of
Central and Northern Asia, including the
Ainu people, under the Caucasoid label. Many scientists maintained the racial categorizations of color established by Meiners' and Blumenbach's works, along with many other early steps of anthropology, well into the 20th century as they were increasingly used to justify political policies such as segregation and immigration restrictions. For example,
Thomas Henry Huxley (1870) classified all populations of Asian nations as Mongoloid.
Lothrop Stoddard (1920) in turn classified as "brown" most of the populations of the Middle East, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, Central Asia and South Asia. He counted as "white" only European peoples and their descendants, as well as a few populations in areas adjacent to or opposite southern Europe, in parts of Anatolia and parts of the Rif and Atlas mountains. In 1939, Coon claimed that the Caucasian race had originated through admixture between
Homo neanderthalensis and
Homo sapiens of the "Mediterranean type" which he considered to be distinct from Caucasians, rather than a subtype of it as others had done. While Blumenbach had erroneously thought that light skin color was ancestral to all humans and the dark skin of southern populations was due to sun, Coon thought that Caucasians had lost their original pigmentation as they moved North. In 1962, Coon published
The Origin of Races, wherein he proposed a
polygenist view, that human races had evolved separately from local varieties of
Homo erectus. He divided humans into five main races and claimed that each evolved in parallel but at different rates, so that some races had reached higher levels of evolution than others. Coon also claimed that Caucasoid traits emerged prior to the Cro-Magnons, and were present in the
Skhul and Qafzeh hominins. However, these fossils and the
Predmost specimen were held to be Neanderthaloid derivatives because they possessed short
cervical vertebrae, lower and narrower pelves, and had some Neanderthal skull traits. Coon further asserted that the Caucasoid race was of dual origin, consisting of early
dolichocephalic (e.g.
Galley Hill,
Combe-Capelle,
Téviec) and Neolithic Mediterranean
Homo sapiens (e.g.
Muge,
Long Barrow,
Corded), as well as Neanderthal-influenced
brachycephalic Homo sapiens dating to the
Mesolithic and
Neolithic (e.g.
Afalou, Hvellinge, Fjelkinge). Coon's theories on race were much disputed in his lifetime,
Disproof by modern genetics The fact that there are no sharp distinctions between the supposed racial groups had been observed by Blumenbach and later by
Charles Darwin. With the availability of new data due to the development of modern genetics, the concept of races in a biological sense has become untenable. Problems of the concept include: It "is not useful or necessary in research", scientists are not able to agree on the definition of a certain proposed race, and they do not even agree on the number of races, with some proponents of the concept suggesting 300 or even more "races". nor with the concept of "biologically discrete, isolated, or static" populations.
Current scientific consensus After discussing various criteria used in biology to define subspecies or races,
Alan R. Templeton concludes in 2016: "[T]he answer to the question whether races exist in humans is clear and unambiguous: no." ==Classification==