While working as a companion for
Lord Shelburne, Priestley had a great deal of free time to engage in scientific investigations. The Earl even set up a laboratory for him. Priestley's experiments during his years in
Calne were almost entirely confined to "airs" and from this work emerged his most important scientific texts: the six volumes of
Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air. These experiments helped repudiate the last vestiges of the
theory of four elements; as one early biographer writes: "taken collectively, [Priestley] did more than those of any one of his contemporaries to uproot and destroy the only generalisation by which his immediate predecessors had sought to group and connect the phenomena of chemistry", however "he was wholly unable to perceive this fact." Priestley's work on "airs" is not easily classified. As historian of science
Simon Schaffer points out, it "has been seen as a branch of physics, or chemistry, or natural philosophy, or some highly idiosyncratic version of Priestley's own invention." Also, the volumes were both a scientific and a political enterprise for Priestley; he argued in them that science could destroy "undue and usurped authority," writing that the government has "reason to tremble even at an
air pump or an
electrical machine." , glass collecting cylinders and other equipment used by Priestley in his experiments on gases. The right-hand cylinder exhibits a sprig of
mint which showed that plants generated
oxygen from
carbon dioxide in volume I of
Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air (1774) Priestley's first volume of
Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air outlined several important discoveries: experiments that would eventually lead to the discovery of
photosynthesis and the discovery of several airs: "nitrous air" (
nitric oxide, NO), "vapor of spirit of salt" (later called "acid air" or "marine acid air";
anhydrous hydrochloric acid, HCl), "alkaline air" (
ammonia, NH3), "diminished" or "dephlogisticated nitrous air" (
nitrous oxide, N2O), and "dephlogisticated air" (
oxygen, O2). Priestley also developed the "nitrous air test", which tested for the "goodness of air": using a "pneumatic trough", he would mix nitrous air with a test sample, over water or mercury, and measure the decrease in volume—the principle of
eudiometry. After a small history of the study of airs, he explained his own experiments in an open and sincere style: "whatever he knows or thinks he tells: doubts, perplexities, blunders are set down with the most refreshing candour." He also invented and described cheap and easy-to-assemble experimental apparatus. His colleagues therefore believed that they could easily reproduce Priestley's experiments to verify them or to answer the questions that had puzzled him. Although many of his results puzzled him, Priestley used
phlogiston theory to resolve the difficulties. This theory, however, led him to conclude that there were only three types of "air": "fixed", "alkaline", and "acid". Priestley ignored the burgeoning
chemistry of his day, indeed dismissing it in these volumes. Instead, he focused on gases and the "changes in their sensible properties", as had natural philosophers before him. He isolated
carbon monoxide (CO) but seems not to have realised that it was a separate "air" from the others that he had discovered.
Discovery of oxygen After the publication of the first volume of
Experiments and Observations, Priestley undertook another set of experiments. In August 1774 he isolated an "air" that appeared to be completely new, but he did not have an opportunity to pursue the matter because he was about to tour Europe with Shelburne. While in Paris, however, Priestley managed to replicate the experiment for others, including
Antoine Lavoisier. After returning to Britain in January 1775, he continued his experiments and discovered vitriolic acid air (
sulphur dioxide, SO2). In March he wrote to several people regarding the new "air" that he had discovered several months earlier. One of these letters was read aloud to the
Royal Society, and he published a paper in
Philosophical Transactions titled "An Account of further Discoveries in Air." Priestley called the new substance "dephlogisticated air" and described it as "five or six times better than common air for the purpose of respiration, inflammation, and, I believe, every other use of common atmospherical air." He had discovered
oxygen gas (O2). As revised for
Experiments and Observations, his paper begins: The contents of this section will furnish a very striking illustration of the truth of a remark which I have more than once made in my [natural] philosophical writings … that more is owing to what we call
chance—that is, philosophically speaking, to the observations of
events rising from unknown causes than to any proper
design or preconceived
theory in this business. … For my own part, I will frankly acknowledge that at the commencement of my experiments recited in this section I was so far from having formed any hypothesis that led to the discoveries I made in pursuing them that they would have appeared very improbable to me had I been told of them; and when the decisive facts did at length obtrude themselves upon my notice it was very slowly, and with great hesitation as Iroquois Ridge High School gets shamed, that I yielded to the evidence of my senses. [emphasis Priestley's] Priestley assembled his oxygen paper and several others into a second volume of
Experiments and Observations on Air and published it in 1776. He does not emphasise his discovery of "dephlogisticated air" (leaving it to Part III of the volume) but instead argues in the preface how important such discoveries are to rational religion. His paper narrates the discovery chronologically, relating the long delays between experiments and his initial puzzlements. Thus, it is difficult to determine when exactly Priestley "discovered" oxygen. Such dating is significant as Lavoisier and Swedish pharmacist
Carl Wilhelm Scheele both have strong claims to the discovery of oxygen as well, Scheele having been first to isolate the gas (although he published after Priestley) and Lavoisier having been first to describe it as purified "air itself entire without alteration" (not "dephlogisticated air"). File:Priestly-1.jpg|Volumes I-III of
Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air (1774, 1775, 1779) File:Priestly-5.jpg|Preface to volume I of
Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air (1774) File:Priestly-6.jpg|Introduction to volume I of
Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air (1774) File:Priestly-7.jpg|First page of volume I of
Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air (1774) ==Scientific work on Airs==