Immortality Christian exegetes of Genesis 2:17 ("for in the day that you eat of it you shall die", also known as the "commandment to life"), have applied the
day-year principle to explain how Adam died within a day. Psalms 90:4, 2 Peter 3:8, and Jubilees 4:40 explain that, to
God, one day is equivalent to a thousand years and thus Adam died within that same "day". The Greek
Septuagint, on the other hand, has "day" translated into the Greek word for a twenty-four-hour period (). According to
Meredith Kline, the death threatened in Genesis 2:17 is "not physical death but eternal perdition (later called 'second death')." This is because, in
covenant theology, the "curse" aspect of the commandment to life is balanced by its blessing, which is "glorified eternal life", symbolised by the tree of life () and the
Sabbath ().
Original sin in the
Sistine Chapel,
Vatican City (1510–1564)|left
Roman Catholicism The
Catechism of the Catholic Church says: "The account of the fall in
Genesis 3 uses figurative language, but affirms [...] that the whole of human history is marked by the original fault freely committed by our first parents."
St Bede and others, especially
Thomas Aquinas, said that the fall of Adam and Eve brought "four wounds" to human nature. They are original sin (lack of sanctifying grace and original justice),
concupiscence (the soul's passions are no longer ordered perfectly to the soul's intellect), physical frailty and death, and darkened intellect and ignorance. These negated or diminished the gifts of God to Adam and Eve of original justice or sanctifying grace, integrity, immortality and infused knowledge. This first sin was "transmitted" by Adam and Eve to all of their descendants as original sin, causing humans to be "subject to ignorance, suffering and the dominion of death, and inclined to sin." In light of modern scripture scholarship, the future
Pope Benedict XVI stated in 1986 that: "In the Genesis story [...] sin is not spoken of in general as an abstract possibility but as a deed, as the sin of a particular person, Adam, who stands at the origin of humankind and with whom the history of sin begins. The account tells us that sin begets sin, and that therefore all the sins of history are interlinked. Theology refers to this state of affairs by the certainly misleading and imprecise term 'original sin.'" Although the state of corruption, inherited by humans after the primaeval event of original sin, is clearly called guilt or sin, it is understood as a sin acquired by the unity of all humans in Adam rather than a personal responsibility of humanity. In the Catechism of the Catholic Church, even children partake in the effects of the sin of Adam, but not in the responsibility of original sin, as sin is always a personal act.
Baptism is considered to erase original sin, though the effects on human nature remain, and for this reason, the Catholic Church baptizes even infants who have not committed any personal sin.
Protestantism In
Covenant theology, the first man,
Adam, is said to have failed to fulfill the commandment to life and the
Covenant of Works, which is summarized in . In verse 15, humanity is to "dress" and "keep" the
Garden of Eden (KJV), or to "work it" and "take care of it" (
NIV). In verse 17, God gives the "focal probationary proscription", that Adam must not eat of the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and a curse is attached if the proscription is transgressed, which is spiritual death. but Adam freely and willfully transgressed the commandment by accepting
Satan's lie in , demonstrating pride and a rejection of
God's authority as Creator, preferring his own will to God's, leading to a corruption of his whole nature, which extended to his progeny, as is described in Article 14 of the
Belgic Confession.We believe that God created man out of the dust of the earth, and made and formed him after his own image and likeness, good, righteous, and holy, capable in all things to will, agreeably to the will of God. But being in honour, he understood it not, neither knew his excellency, but wilfully subjected himself to sin, and consequently to death, and the curse, giving ear to the words of the devil. For the commandment of life, which he had received, he transgressed: and by sin separated himself from God, who was his true life, having corrupted his whole nature; whereby he made himself liable to corporal and spiritual death. And being thus become wicked, perverse, and corrupt in all his ways, he hath lost all his excellent gifts, which he had received from God, and only retained a few remains thereof, which, however, are sufficient to leave man without excuse; for all the light which is in us is changed into darkness, as the scriptures teach us, saying:
The light shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not: where St. John calleth men darkness. painting by
Thomas Cole (1801–1848), now in the collection of the
Museum of Fine Arts in
Boston, United States. By the inverse to the concept of
imputed righteousness, Adam, as the
federal head of humanity, brought condemnation and death to all by his violation of the commandment to life. Kline justifies this interpretation by referencing , in which it says "For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ." Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." which says a son is not guilty of the sins of his father. The Church teaches that, in addition to their conscience and tendency to do good, men and women are born with a tendency to sin due to the fallen condition of the world. It follows
Maximus the Confessor and others in characterising the change in human nature as the introduction of a "deliberative will" () in opposition to the "natural will" () created by God which tends toward the good. Thus, according to
Paul the Apostle in his
epistle to the Romans, non-Christians can still act according to their conscience. Eastern Orthodoxy believes that, while everyone bears the consequences of the first sin (that is, death), only Adam and Eve are guilty of that sin. Adam's sin is not comprehended only as disobedience to God's commandment, but as a change in man's hierarchy of values from
theocentricism to
anthropocentrism, driven by the object of his lust, outside of God, in this case the tree which was seen to be "good for food", and something "to be desired" (see also
theosis, seeking union with God).
Meta-historical fall The biblical fall of man is also understood by some
Christian theologians, especially those belonging to the
Eastern Orthodox tradition, as a reality outside of empirical history that affects the entire history of the universe. This concept of a
meta-historical fall (also called metaphysical, supramundane, or atemporal) has been most recently expounded by the Eastern Orthodox theologians
David Bentley Hart,
John Behr, and
Sergei Bulgakov, but it has roots in the writings of several
early Church Fathers, especially
Origen and
Maximus the Confessor. American philosopher and Eastern Orthodox theologian
David Bentley Hart has written about the concept of an atemporal fall in his 2005 book
The Doors of the Sea, as well as in his 2018 essay ''The Devil's March: Creatio ex nihilo, the Problem of Evil, and a Few Dostoyevskian Meditations''.
Subordination In the subordination exegesis of the Fall, the natural consequences of sin entering the human race were prophesied by God to Eve in Genesis 3:16: the husband "will rule over you". This interpretation is reinforced by comments in the
First Epistle to Timothy, where the author gives a rationale for directing that a woman (NIV: possibly "wife"): Therefore, some interpretations of these passages from Genesis 3 and 1 Timothy 2 have developed a view that women are considered as bearers of Eve's guilt and that the woman's conduct in the fall is the primary reason for her universal, timeless, subordinate relationship to the man. Alternatively, Richard and
Catherine Clark Kroeger argue: "there is a serious theological contradiction in telling a woman that when she comes to faith in Christ, her personal sins are forgiven but she must continue to be punished for the sin of Eve." They maintain that judgmental comments against women in reference to Eve are a "dangerous interpretation, in terms both of biblical theology and of the call to Christian commitment". They reason that "if the Apostle Paul was forgiven for what he did ignorantly in unbelief", including persecuting and murdering Christians, "and thereafter was given a ministry, why would the same forgiveness and ministry be denied women" (for the sins of their foremother, Eve). Addressing that, the Kroegers conclude that Paul was referring to the promise of Genesis 3:15 that through the defeat of Satan on the cross of Jesus Christ, the woman's child (Jesus) would crush the serpent's head, but the serpent would only bruise the heel of her child. ==Other traditions==